View Week 681 Monday, June 27, 2011

View Week 681 Monday, June 27, 2011 – 1

 

ON FLAKES AND FLAKINESS

 

Is Chris Wallace a Flake?

 

Fox News reporter Chris Wallace, who is certainly no liberal, decided that he would throw Michele Bachmann a softball. He has now apologized. He needs to rethink that.

The talk show host posted the video apology after his “Fox News Sunday” interview with the Minnesota congresswoman, who formally announced her presidential bid Monday in Iowa. Wallace said on the Fox show that Bachmann had a reputation in Washington for making questionable statements and asked her: “Are you a flake?” (link)

Instead of answering the questions, Bachmann chose to take umbrage, and she has collected a pot full of it. She insists the question is insulting, that she is a serious person, that Wallace has not groveled sufficiently and his apologies are not accepted. As for me, I’m not an experienced news interviewer, but I am an experienced political campaign manager, and I don’t see why it was an insulting question: Bachmann, like every politician on Earth, has said things in public that she would have said differently if she had the chance to do it over, and here she had a great opportunity to say something to that effect. It was a gold plated Mulligan, and Bachmann must have been having a bad day not to recognize that. Even had the question been asked in a hostile news interview and intended as an insult it would have been a great opportunity for Bachmann.

The question doesn’t make Chris Wallace a flake. I don’t watch a lot of political television, because I generally find that unrewarding. The ability to do political interviews and photo ops and such like is a necessary quality for holding high political office, particularly the Presidency. The office requires that one have the dignitas and gravitas to do national acts like awarding the Medal of Honor and delivering the equivalent of The King’s Speech, and that has to be shown during the campaign. The Brits have the descendents of the sons of the body of the Electress Sophia of Hannover to perform national functions, but in America that’s up to the President, and when the President lays the national wreath at Arlington on Memorial Day, we really don’t want to be reminded of the times when he paraded around in a toga during undergraduate days. Whatever else a President must not be, he – or she – cannot be a flake. Wallace could have been a bit more delicate in asking this, but he’s certainly not to be condemned for asking it.

Every political candidate is going to be asked to demonstrate that he/she is not a flake. Every former gaffe is going to be unexpectedly sprung , and at any point the candidate is going to be tasked at proving the absence of flakiness. It’s inevitable. Look at the endurance tests Sarah Palin was subjected to.

 

Is Sarah Palin a Flake?

 

Not in my judgment. She has been a Mayor, a Governor, a survivor of a national campaign, best selling author and survivor of several book signing tours – known in the trade as authors’ death marches – and a national political figure while holding her family together in a big public showroom. She has already shown that she has the dignitas to perform acts of national unity. We can argue about her other plusses and minuses, but she has already passed this test. Yes, she has said a few things she’d rephrase. I bet she’d have welcomed a chance at the Chris Wallace softball.

 

Is Michele Bachmann a Flake?

 

Until this morning I wouldn’t have given that any thought. Had I been her campaign manager (and understand that it has been a while since I was a successful campaign manager in campaigns for a Mayor and a Congressman) I would have warned her to be ready for that question – it was inevitable – and rehearsed both answers and reactions to the inevitable question. That’s the sort of thing campaign managers have either to do or to be sure someone else does. It’s a very important part of a campaign.

And that’s the problem for me: no, I don’t think Congressman Bachmann is a flake, but I do think she’s working at playing one on national TV; and I do think she was insufficiently prepared to begin a candidacy for President of the United States. She clearly chose the wrong campaign staff – any competent national campaign manager would know that she was going to be asked the question not once but many times. She clearly doesn’t yet see that Chris Wallace is not the enemy; if she thinks he was trying to insult her, wait until she gets the treatment from people who really don’t like her. Perhaps she could ask Sarah Palin what that feels like.

No, I don’t think Bachmann is a flake; but I do think she has insufficient experience in both executive office and in campaigning, and if she doesn’t grow up fast she has managed to end her campaign for President the day before it formally began.

= = = = = = = = = =

Note on Format

Note: I am experimenting with formats, and ways of presentation. I’m trying to get a template that works for VIEW, and a style – a way to present the day’s views as coherent thoughts, not some random string of thoughts in reverse order of their creation as this systems seems to encourage – and it’s taking me a while to evolve how to do it. I have one friend who says that if I keep this up I will manage to lose all my readers in a week. I have others who say I’m not doing so bad and it stays interesting, and a few who like the new system. Me, I’m still just trying to keep things going.

Suggestions welcome. What I need to do is stop thinking about presentation and use what’s left of my brain to think about what I’m writing, not how I am presenting it… We’ll get there. Please stay with it.

= = = = = = =

Note on Apologies

Leroy Jethro Gibbs of NCIS is famous for saying “Never apologize. It’s a sign of weakness.” I don’t know the actual origin of that homily but Dinozo could give Gibbs a pretty good lecture on its use in movies. To the best I can tell, it originally appears as said by Captain Brittles in stories by James Warner Bellah. Brittles is the captain of a one-troop post in the Old West. He’s the hero of She Wore a Yellow Ribbon. Captain Brittles can’t be promoted; he has earned the hostility of some senior Old Army brass, and he is doomed to stay out there on the frontier as a captain until eventually he succumbs, probably on the trail of savages – like the captain in Spanish Man’s Grave, also by Bellah, and possibly the best army western ever written.

Colonel Bellah – one time World War I pilot, then an air commando with the Chindits and Stillwell – wrote many of the scripts for John Wayne westerns, and Wayne, having read the line, wanted it for himself. He was fond of using it off camera. In A Thunder of Drums Richard Boone gets to use the phrase but as a different captain with a history similar to that of Brittles. Thunder of Drums was written long after Yellow Ribbon.

Dinozo could come up with a lot more lore about John Wayne and the James Warner Bellah novels. I was privileged to know Colonel Bellah – he invited me to call him Jim, but I never quite dared – and I was able to publish “Spanish Man’s Grave” in, of all things, a science fiction anthology called “There Will be War.” James Warner Bellah was as colorful as any of the myriad characters he created.

Colonel Bellah died of a heart attack during a visit to his friend James Francis Cardinal McIntyre, Archbishop of Los Angeles. I’m sure he thought that appropriate.

 

VIEW Sunday June 26, 2011

View June 26, 2011 0300

Corpus Christi

 

 

Second Day of New System

 

At the moment the WordPress system seems to be working but mail to jerryp@jerrypournelle.com is not getting to me. It will by the end of the day. It is very late and past my bed time. UPDATE: mail problems are fixed and all is well. Read on.

 

It is my intention to keep this open all day and add to or revise it from time to time so you should renew this if you look at it after an interval. I will have a new item for each day, but not multiple files per day. I add to the day book as needed.

 

Contempt of Cop

Coast to Coast tonight is on the contempt of cop arrest of the woman in Rochester who was videotaping the police and got arrested for it. Interesting discussions, but I am not sure much new has emerged. Any officer who thinks he can prevent people from making videos of his actions will regret thinking that if he believes that will cover up any bad procedures. Electronics are too good and too small and lenses are too good. I can understand a policeman resenting citizens making videos of their actions, but that is probably a mistake given the ubiquity of recording cameras. Police had best get in the habit of acting as if they are on stage at all times.

= = = =

 

And off to bed, it being very late.

= = = = =

1630 Sunday After Adventures

 

We are in the process of moving to BlueHost after years of smooth and efficient service from Brian and Greg at zidane.mazin. Rick has been doing most of the work. Last night we moved the mail. This morning it was panic time. For reasons I won’t go into, essentially no mail sent to jerryp@jerrypournelle.com, my main mail address, got to me after midnight and before about 1345 this afternoon. That looked to be time for panic, particularly since there were trickles of mail to other addresses I own, one of which ought not to be getting mail. Eventually we got it all figured out, and in a good sized flood a pile came in, much of it commentary on the new site. That will make up most of today’s mail, which I will form up after I get this logbook updated and sent off.

The moral of the story is, as one might suspect, Don’t Panic. Be Logical. I used to tell my technicians and instruct the junior engineers in what I called ‘the relentless application of logic.’ That doesn’t always work in the electronics age – sometimes I think these things really do have minds of their own, and thus we are in the situation of a military commander in which no battle plan survives contact with the enemy – but in fact it almost always does work. See what works and try something beyond that. In the OR business it was the process of making as good a model as you could that would describe what you have, then take excursions from it. If those look reasonable, try physical excursions to test the model. And so forth. Bit harder to do when your model is the climate of the Earth, of course.

Anyway, mail now works. If you sent mail to me I got it. I mostly got it all at once when we solved the problem, but it wasn’t eaten, and I have reviewed most of it. I’ll get to the rest tonight or tomorrow. It’s all here.

 

The World Goes On

 

There is more happening in the world than my transition, but alas, the part of the universe I am aware of has been restricted to getting email working properly. Khaddaffi is said to be trying to negotiate a way out of Libya that doesn’t involve going to some kind of international prison forever. How much is it worth to keep him locked up? Not sure where he would go. Idi Amin fled to Libya, then the Saudis accepted him and even paid for fairly luxurious upkeep so long as he stayed out of politics. He didn’t exactly grow old gracefully, but he certainly lived better than he would have in an Dutch or Belgian jail.

Sun Tzu says that one ought to build golden bridges for one’s enemies, but Sun Tzu is concerned with strategy and victory, not morality and revenge. In any event, the question is, how much is it worth to whom, and who will pay, to get Qadafi out? I suspect that the cost of getting him out of Libya is less than we spend in a week of breaking things and killing people.

I’ll come up for air tomorrow. For today, the relief is tangible: we have View, we have Mail, and we have email. Life approaches normal again. And I’m feeling a lot better today than I did at any time last week. Time to get some work done. Thanks for the patience.

 

= = = = = = =

 

The View from Chaos Manor June 25, 2011

The View from Chaos Manor

June 25, 2011

 

 

 

THE NEW VIEW

 

This is a production experiment: that is, due to the imminent closure of my wonderful old ISP that Brian and Greg ran and which they were able to tweak with customizations and accommodations to my crazy style, we can’t go on as we have been. Microsoft hasn’t supported FrontPage, which as far as I am concerned worked just fine for what I was doing. Apparently I can’t go on using it with a new ISP without the tweaks that Brian and Greg did for me. All this is being handled by friends and advisors, and after some discussion we’ve chosen WordPress. I’ve done some experiments using a dummy site. This is the first “production” post. It’s as plain as it can be. I’ll start playing about with added features, graphics, customized lines, and other conventions as time goes by; first step is to get the darned thing up and running.

 

I compose all these in Word. I am then to use Word to “publish” this through commands built in to Word 2007. I expect to upgrade to Word 2010 fairly soon, but for the moment this will have to do. Each post becomes a separate file and log entry, as opposed to the old FrontPage system in which each week became a file that was updated, sometimes several times a day. I am not sure how that works here: I much prefer to be able to go in and make corrections, add notes, perhaps add links, note objecti0ns or corrections, and such like as I have been doing. It’s my intention to make as few changes in your reading experiences as possible, and what changes are made should be improvements. I suspect that won’t happen the way I expect, but we will see.

 

I’d be happier about the adventure if I could just shake off whatever seems to be afflicting me this week, but that’s another story. Meanwhile it’s a new adventure. I know I have been way behind the times in modern blogging technology despite the fact that I can make a fair claim to being the first blogger. I didn’t call it that because I still think the term is ugly, but I certainly was among the first to have an open daybook and log.

 

For the few people who have wandered in to here and have no idea of what you have found, the old Home Page for Chaos Manor sort of tells that story. I am not dead sure how we link these two places, since only one can be called www.jerrypournelle.com and someone other than me long ago grabbed www.chaosmanor.com and hasn’t let go. We’ll work something out.

 

 

That was an attempt to insert a break line. It’s not one I’ll choose. Back in the early days of this daybook I used different line images for different kinds of breaks, but that became tedious. I then went to a line of equal signs, but Word like to turn those in to a full line, and I am not sure how WordPress will display them. Probably nothing for it but to try and see.

= = = = == = = =

 

 

 

Satellite Solar Power Reconsidered

 

One of the results of my Space-X visit is the discovery that Elon Musk has concluded that even if the costs of putting solar power collectors into space were met, the operating costs of solar power satellites would make the entire thing uneconomical. This is completely contrary to the conclusions reached in the original studies conducted by Boeing, the NASA SSPS project study, and the consultants working with General Graham’s High Frontier.

 

I do not know what studies Musk relies on for this conclusion. A quick on-line search on SSPS operating costs reveals this, which isn’t anything I would rely on, so I assume there are more data I haven’t seen. I do know that when we did the Boeing study one of the tests was transmission of power through atmosphere using Goldstone as the transmitter to a rectenna; the efficiency of the operation, that is, the ratio of usable power out of the rectenna to the input power at Goldstone was about 90%. This was in the early days of collimation, and we may have assumed some improvements in focus – obviously the beam tested was horizontal across the desert, rather than vertical, but the point was to measure atmospheric effects and the distances chosen were to simulate the atmosphere – but the tests were done and the measurements made. There were also some tests of focus and steering. Clearly you can’t steer a power beam by mechanical movements of the transmitting antenna. Anything that uses reaction mass is prohibitively expensive. SSPS designs used electronic means of collimation (focus) and steering, and indeed the energy for the collimator comes from energy received on Earth, then retransmitted to the satellite: the point being that if the power beam walks off the rectenna, the collimator loses power and the beam disperses. That, at least, was one of the designs we worked on.

 

All this was long ago, and I don’t recall all the details; but the conclusions were agreed to by some pretty high powered people, and the operations costs of the power system were carefully considered. This was one of my areas of, if not expertise, then at least competence, and I didn’t find any absurd assumptions in the models we use.

 

Thus it was a bit disappointing to find that one of the successful space entrepreneurs doesn’t believe SSPS is economically feasible. I wasn’t given the reasoning or access to the study numbers, so I’ll have to rethink all of this on my own. I think he’s wrong. I know we worked hard not to omit significant operations costs in the models we did at Boeing, and there were some pretty good Operations Research people involved in the NASA SSPS study and conference, and of course Arthur D. Little did some serious OR studies of the SSPS concept.

 

 

This will have to do for the first day’s ‘production’ view. Now to do a production Mail.

 

It is after midnight. I have made a few additions to see if they come up properly. This has been a reasonable day’s work. Suggestions for layout changes, decorations, and other improvements are now open. Mail and View will be the primary pages but I do hope to create some reports and specials too.

And good night. The lines aren’t working. I was told that there were ways to insert lines, but I haven’t found them yet, Ah well. Not a bad beginning I hope

[