Despair is a sin, and other matters Mail 20110830

Mail 690 Tuesday, August 30, 2011

clip_image002

Your pessimism is WAY overblown

I agree that cutting back energy will cause massive deprivation. That’s why it won’t happen.

You talk about our Masters, but that is where your argument falls apart: they may THINK they are our masters, but they cannot hold power. The Russians had much worse masters than we do, and with much tighter control–yet even they could not hold power forever.

Polls show that a huge majority of Americans now reject the radical environmentalist agenda. With the inauguration of President Richard Perry in 2013, that agenda will be as dead as Soviet Communism.

Incidentally, why is it that you assume that the USA is doomed because it mixes in socialism with its free enterprise system, but that China and India are the wave of the future because they mix in free enterprise with their socialist systems? We are still a far freer nation economically than those countries, and will most likely weather these economic storms better.

I was a big fan of A STEP FARTHER OUT, largely because it took up the optimistic view of technology that Isaac Asimov abandoned when he took up ZPG. Now you seem to have given up hope, right at the point when commercial space is taking off and environmental radicalism is on its deathbed.

Politics, from what I can see, goes in cycles. The 90’s and 00’s were, like the 60’s and 70’s, more or less statist decades. The 10’s, unless I miss my guess, will probably be conservative/classical liberal, like the 80’s. We are standing on the edge of raining soup. I wish you’d stop acting as if the only people in the world who matter are the left-wing chattering classes.

Ken

I scarcely know where to begin, but perhaps here: it is pointless to write warnings about a fate we cannot escape. I do not warn you of a future you cannot avoid. On the other hand I have for forty years warned that we are approaching a precipice, and yet we continue to move toward it. Sometimes I get discouraged.

In A Step Farther Out I described a world I thought we could and would get to in my lifetime. I wrote stories in that coming world. We are now in the time frame of those stories, but we are not really exploiting orbit and the Moon, much less asteroid resources. Alas. I had thought that the end of the Cold War would move us to a new world of expectation and hope. Instead we seem to be stuck on Hope and Change. My apologies if I seen unduly gloomy,

For years I have warned that we sow the wind. I see we are reaping now – and we continue to sow the wind.

I know that politics goes in cycles. We learned that from Aristotle.

Negative Mention of Federal Government at all-time High

<.>

Just 17% held a positive view of the federal government with another 20% being neutral. Meanwhile, a whopping 63% said they were negative about the government – an all-time low for a Gallup poll.

Gallup, which has conducted this survey each August since 2001, said that Americans’ frustration with politicians and Washington was amplified by the angry – and frustrating – summer debate over the debt ceiling negotiations.

This marks the first time that the government finished at the bottom, displacing last year’s winner of the booby prize, the oil and gas industry.

</>

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/08/29/scitech/main20098838.shtml

—–

Most Respectfully,

Joshua Jordan, KSC

Percussa Resurgo

Remarkable. Hope and Change.

clip_image003

You touched on FEMA in a comparatively recent view.  Ron Paul weighed in on the discussion:

http://www.infowars.com/ron-paul-why-we-dont-need-fema/

—–

Most Respectfully,

Joshua Jordan, KSC

Percussa Resurgo

It should be obvious that we do not need FEMA, and we receive demonstrations with every disaster. The Republicans can restore Civil Defense. I don’t know if they will. FEMA has many lobbyist friends now.

Maybe what ought to happen here is that instead of just saying "EVERYONE LEAVE, NO EXCEPTIONS", the communities involved should develop building codes and resources that *would* survive these major storms. Maybe if the houses weren’t cheap junk slapped together to capitalize on the value of beachfront real-estate, they’d be able to shelter the occupants.

Mike T. Powers

clip_image002[1]

The economy: it’s our fault

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/consumer-fears-put-economy-on-the-brink/2011/08/26/gIQAVbzclJ_story.html?hpid=z1

Which immediately reminded me of a poem you first introduced me to

http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2006/brecht140806.html

Steve Chu

Brecht’s redemption.

The Solution
Bertolt Brecht

After the uprising of the 17th June
The Secretary of the Writer’s Union
Had leaflets distributed in the Stalinallee
Stating that the people
Had forfeited the confidence of the government
And could win it back only
By redoubled efforts.   Would it not be easier
In that case for the government
To dissolve the people
And elect another?

clip_image002[2]

On demand, and consumers

Something has been very clear to me for some time; a point which seems not to be considered important (or not considered at all) by some. Iron rusts, glass breaks, food is eaten. Through necessary use, natural decay, or intentional destruction, the things of value in this world are constantly consumed. If it weren’t for constant creation, the world would rapidly become hellish. Even a slight tipping of the scales toward destruction over creation would lead to a world many would find intolerable.

The creation of true value should be encouraged. Creation must outpace consumption and destruction. Anything else is suicidal. (Of course, this raises the question of what is of true value. I’m not among those who think that it’s anything people are willing to pay for — drugs have destroyed many lives, for example. It’s a question I’ve wrestled with for some time, and haven’t found a satisfactory answer.)

On a related note…

Even in the face of empty store shelves in almost any time of panic, there are many who believe we’re in, or near, a post-scarcity world. If there is abundance (in this view), then there is no need for incentives to create, and the only reason for concentrated wealth is class exploitation. And one way to remedy the injustice is to burn and loot. It seems our society has not done enough teaching of the Gods of the Copybook Headings. Experience is likely to be a more cruel teacher. But if we learn the right lessons, we’ll come out of it a society worthy and able to take to the stars.

Thanks for the education your site provides.

— Steve Carabello

Some lessons are very costly.

clip_image002[3]

California Diaspora, Weather and Chas Theory

Dear Jerry,

You and I have corresponded (that is, I’ve written and you’ve published my comments on Chaos Manor) much to my delight. These days I’m one of the folks who has been part of the great Diaspora out of California. That, of course, is the tragedy that California brought upon itself, the loss of the well educated, middle class mature adult professionals (I am perhaps in the last generation of engineers to be trained at a CSU – a EEE at CSU, Sacramento).

These days I live just outside Seattle and am much the happier for it. While I may have the insanity of the Federal government to contend with, I also live in a state that requires itself constitutionally to live within its means. This has led to WA being the only "blue state" to have population growth, growth in jobs and employment AND actual growth in wealth. When compared to our southern neighbors of Oregon and California, we are veritable paradise.

I am one of many millions of Californians who have fled to low tax, high growth refuges such as Texas, Colorado, Nevada and Washington. While much more difficult, I think that eventually we will see a diaspora of this nature happen from the USA if we don’t solve our federal government problems. The lack of religious and economic liberty, after all, resulted in the same thing happening from Europe to America (I am simplifying, of course, but not too much I think).

About AGW aka global warming aka climate change. As I recall, strange attractors and chaos theory emerged from the work of first Poincare and later Lorenz and Mandelbrot. And specifically, Lorenz was doing computer modeling of weather and discovered that extremely minor changes in his input data resulted in wildly varying outcomes of the modeled system. At the same time Mandelbrot was looking at things like cotton prices and discovering that scale mattered in how you measured your subject, leading ultimately to Fractal Geometry.

It bothers me (especially with that EEE background) that we seem to so arrogantly assume that we can predict the outcomes of a complex system. Modern system theory says that we can only predict general possibilities of outcomes and that the attractors (strange attractors, Lorenz attractors, etc.) will determine the possible variation. Admittedly I haven’t worked on this problem, since these days I work in Information Security. We have our own sets of issues to deal with and they occupy most of my intellectual energy. I’m sure, having read you for many years now, that you are painfully aware of those issues. That said, with a reasonable undergraduate background in math, physics, computer science, electrical engineering I am having a hard time seeing how reasonable and well qualified scientists were so blinded to the fact that computer modelling complex systems means you end up with a range of possibilities?

I’m curious what you think about my comments on the Diaspora as well as weather and chaos theory.

thanks for Chaos Manor, one of my favorite sources of thought on a daily basis.

Eric

Eric Cowperthwaite

Some processes are chaotic. They cannot be modelled. They certainly cannot be modelled when one does not know all the factors.

"People see that and assume we can predict everything."

But isn’t that what the Warmists – sorry, Changeists – have been telling us?

<http://apnews.myway.com/article/20110828/D9PDAF0O0.html>

Roland Dobbins

clip_image003[1]

America Gives China A Mineral Monopoly

August 16, 2011: Complaints from the Congo are growing about the U.S. legislation intended to stop illegal mineral sales. The Dodd-Frank bill (also called the Obama Law) has a clause that prohibits the sale of so-called conflict minerals may have been well-intentioned but it was not well-thought out. Rather than run the risk of buying any minerals that might have been smuggled from the Congo, many major mining companies are simply refusing to buy minerals from central Africa. The result is a de facto embargo. There are few buyers for Congo’s valuable minerals, especially tantalum and tungsten which have many hi-tech uses. This has damaged the Congo’s economy, because the nation relies on mineral exports. According to some sources, China, which does not have to meet Dodd-Frank standards, is snapping up many minerals at very cheap prices.

The road to Hell…..

John from Waterford

But we can’t do anything about that It might be in the US interst, and we have to act impartially when we go break things and kill people and spend money and borrow more money so we can spend more money.

But of course

http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/article/york-spending-not-entitlements-created-deficits#ixzz1VrBaD18e

clip_image002[4]

clip_image005

clip_image002[5]

Lest We Forget 20110830

View 690 Tuesday, August 30, 2011

I was going to write an essay on what we must do now, but I have a dinner appointment with my long time editor Bob Gleason and some of his friends, probably including George Noory, and it’s getting late. It seems to me that the first thing the Republicans can do is every month repeal the Dodd-Frank regulatory bill. The Senate won’t pass it, but it is well to keep drumming on it. We now have a report by Frank Keating of the American Bankers Association that in some banks there are now more employees working on compliance with regulations than there are those working on banking. The cost of regulations in this nation run to about a $Trillion a year. They also force smaller operations out of business since compliance officers often eat up the marginal profits. This concentrates industries into those large enough to afford the costs of regulation as a cost of doing business. Goldman Sachs with thousands of employees can manage; a Midwestern bank with 37 can’t manage the 4.870 pages of Dodd-Frank. One of the best things we can do to reduce the deficit is to cut way back on regulations. They may or may not be a good idea in boom times, but for now we can’t afford them. Go back to what we endured under Clinton.

It’s time to go. If you’re looking for something to read try http://www.jerrypournelle.com/reports/jerryp/lessons.html in which I look at Ortega y Gasset and the 20th Century. I wrote it some time ago, but it’s still readable.

clip_image002

I note from today’s Wall Street Journal that there will be no clergy participating in the World Trade Center 9/11 memorial ceremony on the tenth anniversary of the event. It is as if Roosevelt had rejected any religious presence at observances of Pearl Harbor Day. Of course Roosevelt would have done no such thing, and didn’t. In those times just about every public ceremony down to the dedication of the ground for a new dog pound was opened by an Invocation, generally by a Protestant Minister (Lutheran in Minnesota, Baptist in the South), and a closing prayer, usually a blessing by a Roman Catholic priest. More important ceremonies would include a local rabbi. There would seldom be a Buddhist, Hindu, Muslim, Animist, Wiccan, Zoroastrian, Sikh, Druze, or Druid, although after I got to college I heard stories of one or another of these groups trying to insert themselves into the invitation list, or appearing uninvited demanding to be heard. These things used to be sorted out locally. Now they are federal cases.

The Republic endured for some 200 years without the courts intervening into these matters.

I am sure that many readers are puzzled as to why this matters. It’s all a bunch of silliness and self-deception anyway. It’s a pointless waste of time to pray, give thanks, or any of that nonsense. Why that implies a right to forbid anyone else from doing so is a logical puzzle to me, although I can see a certain symmetry for those who can recall being belittled for atheism. I also suspect there are fewer and fewer of those: it has been a long time since we had heresy trials in the US. Perhaps not so long since employers tended to have a negative view of atheist job applicants, but I suspect few of those who are militant about excluding the clergy from public ceremonies have had any such experience.

It is less surprising to find minority groups moving from rejoicing in tolerance to demanding participation. I still find it hard to understand militant atheism like that of Mad Madeleine Murray O’Hair, but that’s another story. From her view all religion is a waste of time, but there are lots of things that waste time.

We are running an interesting and open-ended experiment on crushing all religious basis for national unity and patriotism. Clearly we are betting on the wrong side of Pascal’s Wager (wrong from the view of game theory, anyway). The Old Testament tells the story of one people who insisted on making that bet, with subsequent consequences.

The experiment we are running is whether a nation of people who are no longer encouraged to believe in anything, even so amorphous a concept as Judao-Christian ethics or the kind of Deism that Washington and Jefferson encouraged, has much of a chance against a culture and people who believe strongly. We are apparently determined to run that experiment.

Recessional

Rudyard Kipling, 1897

God of our fathers, known of old—
Lord of our far-flung battle line—
Beneath whose awful hand we hold
Dominion over palm and pine—
Lord God of Hosts, be with us yet,
Lest we forget—lest we forget!

The tumult and the shouting dies—
The Captains and the Kings depart—
Still stands Thine ancient sacrifice,
An humble and a contrite heart.
Lord God of Hosts, be with us yet,
Lest we forget—lest we forget!

Far-called our navies melt away—
On dune and headland sinks the fire—
Lo, all our pomp of yesterday
Is one with Nineveh and Tyre!
Judge of the Nations, spare us yet,
Lest we forget—lest we forget!

If, drunk with sight of power, we loose
Wild tongues that have not Thee in awe—
Such boastings as the Gentiles use,
Or lesser breeds without the Law—
Lord God of Hosts, be with us yet,
Lest we forget—lest we forget!

For heathen heart that puts her trust
In reeking tube and iron shard—
All valiant dust that builds on dust,
And guarding calls not Thee to guard.
For frantic boast and foolish word,
Thy Mercy on Thy People, Lord!

Amen.

We have forgotten. Perhaps the Gods of the Copybook Headings will remind us.

clip_image002[1]

Call Me Joe

At a Los Angeles Science Fantasy Society (LASFS) meeting a few weeks ago I mentioned to Karen Anderson that eBook publishing offers an opportunity for some supplementary income, and that some authors, including me, are getting small but steady sales of our older works. That can include novels, of course, but also short stories. Poul was one of my closest friends for forty years and more, and after he died Karen sold their Bay Area house and moved down here (just in time to be chased out of her house by the Station Fire evacuation, but that was just an area evac with no lasting consequences.) I note that there are a LOT of Anderson works available on Kindle, some I think rather overpriced: I suspect those were done by an agent or a publisher. I note that publishers often ssume they have eBook rights on older works even though there is not a word in the contract. One can hope they pay royalties to the author’s estate. Residuals from older stories are about the only pensions authors get other than Social Security, which we certainly paid into through the Self Employment Tax.

She tells me they have recently put up “Call Me Joe,” a novelette from some fifty years ago, for the Kindle minimum price of 99 cents. You can’t get Amazon to carry anything at all for less than that, and actually Amazon encourages authors to have a minimum price of $2.99. Since credit card companies have a minimum transaction price, there has to be a minimum. Anyway, you can get Call Me Joe for 99 cents, and it’s still a good read. I remember reading it in Analog – it might have been back far enough that it was still Astounding Science Fiction – either in high school or as an undergraduate. I expect someone else read it way back when too: James Cameron. Call Me Joe would seem a great candidate for the work that inspired Cameron to write Avatar; if it wasn’t, I’ll bet you that whoever wrote the work that inspired Cameron had read Call Me Joe. The story has held up well over the years. It’s still a good read. You also get a copy of the original Frank Kelly Freas cover illustration.

http://www.amazon.com/Call-Me-Joe-ebook/dp/B005H7LJJM/ref=sr_1_31?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1314744452&sr=1-31

clip_image002[2]

The Alien Menace

We mentioned this a week ago, but I guess Rush didn’t read my site that week. I have minor evidence that somone in his staff checks here periodically, but they didn’t get this one, because I heard Rush railing about the NASA staff paper on the threat of alien invasion for our Green sins. I can’t blame him for getting it wrong, because on the surface all the evidence pointed to the story being authentic, and of course there was a paper that did mention the possibility of aliens attacking Earth to prevent us from destroying the planet (Klaatu barada nikto!), and it was written by some Ph.D.’s one of whom is sort of associated with NASA; but the facts are much less exciting. The junior co-author of the paper is a post-doc (a position that didn’t exist when I got my Ph.D.; in my day if you had the degree you would get a real job, not an internship) at NASA. The paper is about why we haven’t heard from the aliens and goes through all the logical possibilities the authors can think of. This one isn’t presented as very probable. And so forth. For all the details, see the rather charming treatment by Donna Laframboise:

http://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2011/08/19/behind-the-aliens-will-smite-us-news-story/  which is a good way to get a taste of her interesting web site. And don’t be too hard on Rush. It’s the kind of story no talk show host could resist, and most fact checkers would see the mainstream press smoke and wouldn’t dig deep enough to find there’s no fire, just some smouldering rags…

clip_image002[3]

I must have a dozen letters on this one, and at some point I’ll comment:

Better than bunny inspectors–DOJ agents raid Gibson Guitar

Jerry:

Here’s a great addition to your Bunny Inspectors list:

http://youtu.be/O_-taqM5Sk0

Best regards,

Doug Ely

It may be a good cause, but can we afford this sort of thing? Each inspector has to cost at least $100,000, so a dozen is more than a million dollars, and there have to be twenty such groups or units or whatever they call a gaggle of Bunny or Guitar Wood inspectors.

Subject: Bureaucratic priorities

Jerry, I just read an article on Navy Insider

(http://defensetech.org/2011/08/29/the-fate-of-museum-ships-during-a-recession)

about how one of the last Fletcher Class destroyers from WW II (USS Cassin Young) may end up getting scrapped because the National Park Service can’t afford the $18.7 million needed to repair its hull. The Navy has implied that it could do the repairs for less, but doesn’t want the ship back. The administration’s motto, here, seems to be "Millions for Bunny Inspectors but not one cent to preserve our history."

Joe

I am not sure we can afford to preserve the Cassin Young either, but surely that is more worth doing than inspecting stage magician rabbits? I suspect you can if you must raise twenty million among WW II tin can vets if the alternative is losing the last of the Fletcher Class; but I suspect you couldn’t raise a grand for enforcement of federal stage magician bunny permit requirements.

Of course there are important matters that get mishandled:

How can it take three-and-a-half years to repair a single aircraft?

<http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/08/29/the-air-forces-b-2-deception/>

Roland Dobbins

At least that is a jpb worth doing. A job not worth doing is not worth doing well.

clip_image003

clip_image005

clip_image003[1]

FEMA; Suppose Climate change is true? 20110828

View 689 Sunday, August 28, 2011

clip_image002

Civil Defense and FEMA

Tropical Storm/Hurricane Irene seems to have done its worst without too much damage. Last reports are of perhaps a dozen killed, perhaps more, but that number will be offset by fewer traffic fatalities for a summer weekend: fewer people out driving during a hurricane.

The lesson as I see it is that we need to restore the old Civil Defense structure, and fold FEMA into it. The whole notion of a Federal Emergency Management Agency is wrong. There isn’t really much that Washington can do to prepare for this kind of emergency. Emergencies tend to be state or regional, and each state/region has a different set of likelihoods for different emergencies. Deciding what preparations are appropriate is best left to those who live there and probably have been through that kind of disaster and know best what the local people do to cope. Organizing local civil defense requires some appreciation of just what is likely to happen, and who is likely to be there to cope as opposed to those who will absorb all the funds they can get, then leave school busses in the flood plain rather than use them. Civil Defense requires a military sort of organization, with officials who have titles but no powers until an emergency happens: then their commissions become real with the declaration of an emergency. Those who want to see how this can work can find considerable history on the subjet, including strengths and weaknesses. Back when I was looking at Strategic Defense and writing Strategy of Technology I used to pay attention to how Civil Defense worked. Civil Defense emergency preparedness teams were concerned with fallout shelters and the like as part of strategic defense, but of course the plans for coping with natural disasters, and actual performance during those disasters is pretty good education for planning for the destruction of war.

Local Civil Defense is pretty cheap, too, since most of the officials will work for peanuts plus titles and commissions – many tend to be retired military and first responders anyway. Our Emergency Preparedness merit badge counselors for the Scout troop I was involved in while my sons were growing up were all people who knew what they were doing.

FEMA was a very bad idea, and it ought to be dismantled in favor of rebuilding local Civil Defense. The Republicans can do that, and there is no real reason why the Democrats should oppose it, although some will simply because it encourages local activities and control structures not under the thumb of the Federal government. FEMA bureaucrats will be vigorous in opposition, of course. The Iron Law always applies…

clip_image002[1]

Climate Change and storms

For those who want to read more into the news storm about the storm, I show this, but do understand, I don’t subscribe to anything sinister about the coverage. In California we tend to cover the things that rarely happen to us, but we tend to gloss past our routine semi-disasters. We get 75 mph winds in Los Angeles at least once a year during Santa Anna conditions, but since that happens pretty often most of the trees that are going to blow down have done so, and people who have been through it once tend to close their patio umbrellas before the wind or sheepishly remove them from the pool or the neighbors roof if they forget; it’s not news.

A Reality Check on Hurricane Hype….

Friends,

I think this one is going to be interesting. Once again, but more so this time, it seems we have a much overhyped-storm warning. Scaring people has been the trend for years, and some are okay with that (saying “It’s for their own good.”). Still, truth is truth, and the truth is that climate science has now become politicized, and climate alarmism has become an integral plank of the progressive/socialist political agenda, especially since Al Gore won a Nobel Prize for his book and special-effects-based movie. Remember Obama’s rhetoric of how he, as Supreme Leader, was going to “Slow the rise of the seas and heal the planet?”

Here are some early reports of what has actually been happening with Hurricane Irene. It’s definitely a tropical storm, and there has definitely been damage and a few deaths. But there is a major difference between the NOAA reports, the News (including Fox) and what was measured by actual stations on the ground. Does this make you more or less inclined to trust the News Media and our “Never waste a crisis” Maximum Leader? You decide.

Of the links below, the two that I suggest as “keepers” is the second one, published by Forbes and written my friend Pat Michaels, who was the State Climate Scientist for Virginia, and is now with the CATO Institute. The other is the last link, the “weather underground link,” which is not Obama’s mentor Bill Ayers, but, rather, to a data-feed for local stations, a feed that is NOT under the control (so far) of the Obama Administration or NASA.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/aug/26/irene-is-obamas-punishment/

http://news.yahoo.com/real-hurricane-irene-renamed-hurricane-hype-021402485.html

http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2011/08/27/noaas-phony-hurricane-coming-on-shore-with-33-mph-winds/

http://www.wunderground.com/

My guess is that we’ll see more about this weather “reality gap” in coming weeks and months. Gore is about to re-launch his Global Warming Alarmism campaign, big time. He had a profanity-laced meltdown at a major conference a few weeks ago because people dared to question him skeptically, and someone even dared to point out that there has been NO global warming for ten years. That upset him.

Best,

John D. Trudel

I am not endorsing the conspiracy view. However, I do expect to see a lot more about Climate Change in the near future. The evidence that the major climate models have serious errors is surfacing everywhere. See also a critique of the model of sea temperature. The primary data for warming in the last few years tend to ambiguity: in places where the data are easy to obtain the trend seems to be toward “not so much”, but in places like Central Africa and Siberia we have reports of the warmest temperatures in history. The reliability of those data may be questioned, and how much weight one gives to reports from unreliable sources is worth debating although I have seen few such debates.

Apparently there remains at least a real (how large I won’t guess) possibility that we have entered a global cooling phase. There are periodic melts and freezes in sea ice in the high latitudes. One thing I would think we can all agree on is that a new Ice Age would be a far worse disaster than more increases in CO2. But the conventional view seems to be that Anthropological Global Warming is very real. What if that’s true?

clip_image002[2]

Green Dreams

Suppose that the Global Warming/Climate Change fears are all well grounded. Increases in CO2 will doom civilization and threatens the stability of global climate, and the ability of the Earth to sustain civilization. What is it that we – by we I mean the people of the United States – should do, and what is the meaning for the rest of the world?

What will happen to us if it’s all true? Presume it is…

First, it means that we have hit the high point of world consumption and the good life (at least in the material sense) for the people of the world. No more countries like the United States in which the goods of fortune are possessed in moderation by most of the population, and lots of goods of fortune are enjoyed by everyone, even the wretched of the earth. That is all gone. We will return to the normal conditions of history in which most of the population possess very little – in good times enough to eat one good meal a day, have two sets of clothing, enjoy a few holidays – and a very small elite lives in comparative luxury. As for example in Roman times, or the High Middle Ages, or the England of the Jane Austen and Charles Dickens novels (although in Dickens’ time the wretched were more wretched, and there was more of a middle class than in Austen’s day). That will be the fate of the world. For that story see A Farewell to Alms (review here). It won’t get any better.

India and China will continue to exploit the earth until Mother Nature takes her revenge, then they too will collapse and learn to live with the new Malthusian realities. Production falls. There is less to distribute. We will distribute what we have as well as we can given the realities of human nature, but the human condition returns to its natural state: A thin aristocracy atop a vast sea of people who live at the edge of poverty, and can more easily slip into poverty than rise out of it. There will be some who heroically escape into the ruling class, and a few like the Gracchi who come from the nobility and try to spread the wealth about, but there won’t be that much wealth to spread. There is state money for the military – think Napoleon – but underneath that the population is not a great deal above peasantry, and Pournelle’s Iron Law tends to make the governing classes better off at the expense of everyone else. That was the condition of mankind from pre-history until the Industrial Revolution, and the fear of Climate Change/Global Warming will push us to dismantle the roaring furnaces and widespread consumption and runaway manufacture of ticky tacky by installing a planned economy that will insist that the first criterion is that we don’t pollute the atmosphere with CO2. We have seen the outcome of planned economies. Nomenklatura, The New Class, the Iron Law; Oriental Despotism, The Oriental Means of Production as fearfully skirted by Marx and described so well by Wittfogel.

There will be continuing wars on pollution and polluters. Since large scale animal farming pollutes with CO2 that needs to be cut back also: steaks and chicken every Sunday are for the fortunate. We can’t have any widespread production of such meat resources. And so forth.

As to the Green Economy, there really isn’t one. The Green Jobs are not self sustaining. In the US the major Green Jobs are the installation of solar panels made in China with energy from high polluting coal and shipped over here to be installed: the last American solar panel plants are closing. Wind energy is barely self-sustaining in the places where it works, and the mills are made elsewhere and not from Green Energy. We can burn corn instead of eating it, and grow corn instead of wheat; the result is a rise in food prices that already affects much of the world.

China, India, Brazil may be able to escape all this, but by the time they have economies matching anything like what the US had in its glory days before we discovered the necessity of being Green (and learned its limits and costs) they will collapse and by then the Earth will be so damaged that it will take a substantial part of its production just to get things back to sustainable levels.

You can’t win, you can’t break even, and you can’t get out of the game: this is a picture of the future if we take seriously what is being said and done by the Government of the United States of America and the UN science/political reports on Climate Change/Global Warming.

Of course we heard all this before, back before I wrote A STEP FARTHER OUT. The professional futurists had articles headlined with such titles as “Why we have to get poor quick”, and the press was filled with articles about The Limits to Growth, and why we had to take a “soft path” to energy, and much else that we now hear and accept routinely. Of course in those times the great fear was that we were headed for a new Ice Age, and the Models of Doom showed other ways of death than Global Warming, but the news was the same: the Industrial Revolution was over, and it had been a pretty bad idea in the first place. We have to get back to a sustainable environment. Get rid of all this nuclear power. Have bicycle powered home energy generators. There were exhibits of such things at annual meetings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and I recall in one of them Larry Niven suggested we ought to dress a black colleague in rags and have him pumping away on the bicycle while someone in jackboots stood by with a pistol and whip. But that was considered politically incorrect. Niven’s point was the same as mine: dismantle the means of high energy production, cut back to that kind of Green economy, and you may be certain that there will be more people pumping on the bicycles while a few have the jackboots. And the schools won’t teach you how to make your own generator, either….

The alternative, as I point out in A STEP FARTHER OUT, is to continue what the Industrial Revolution started. True, it won’t go the way it did. The trend is toward more high-tech jobs and fewer jobs for those who don’t know how to participate in high-tech high-touch industries. Education has to be revised, and the first revision is to understand that this is not Lake Wobegon: half the population is below average in IQ, and the high tech industries don’t really need even the top half of the population. We have to find ways for those less gifted – note I do NOT say stupid, because IQ 90 is not stupid, but it is about the 25 percentile: that is, a quarter of the population is IQ 90 and below, and I do not think any of those reading this know many people of IQ 90 and below. They aren’t stupid but you are not likely meet them at work unless you have certain jobs including some bureaucratic jobs.

IQ 85 is the 15th percentile. Few of you are likely to spend much time with anyone IQ 85 or below, and not all many more are on speaking terms with someone of that condition. It isn’t snobbery. You just have so very little in common with them.

There are industrial jobs for IQ 85 and below, but they tend to be repetitive, what most of us would consider mind stultifying – the very kind of jobs that robots can often do, and when they can do them, do them much better, more tirelessly, and with fewer mistakes.

These are realities that our civilization must deal with. These are realities that our education system must deal with. These are realities that our political system insists that we ignore.

A sufficiently wealthy society can ignore these realities. A long time ago we provided agricultural jobs for those with strong backs and uneducated minds. There was some tragedy here when an educable mind was trapped in peasant situation, but in some cultures there were paths out of there, through parish schools which could take a farmhand and teach him to be an overseer, or a manor house that could find bright peasant lads and bring them into the household a junior footmen, apprenticed to become household servants. Some, the most capable, managed to find their way to universities or into the Army or Navy. Diocles became Diocletian. We know many of those stories. However, the vast majority of those born peasants lived and died as peasants. They farmed all their lives.

But over time the agricultural jobs vanished. Tractors, harvesters, cotton gins and cotton choppers and cotton pickers, International Harvester corn huskers: the number needed for agriculture plummeted from 70% in 1900 to under 5% in 2000. There just wasn’t enough work for peasants. They had to find other jobs.

The Industrial Society still had factory jobs for the unskilled, but the Computer Revolution takes away all the jobs that can be done by robots. Now what? What can they do? Can they be trained to do something useful? We tried that for a long time, but the moral objections to supporting people in a life of indolence (wanted or not, deserving poor or undeserving poor) faltered, weakened, and politically died. We found a simple solution after that.  A wealthy enough society can simply divert some of the excess productivity to entitlements. That produces problems. An entitlement welfare state is not stable – but it can last a while.

Alas, that much wealth can only be produced by an energy using society. You have to be rich to support the undeserving poor – and we have decided, or at least our Masters have decided, that we cannot continue to be a energy using – read energy wasting polluting climate changing — society, so there goes the wealth. Without that wealth we can’t feed the poor. Government needs more. Borrow money, but eventually we have to raise taxes. Those that pay the taxes resist. There grows a tax collecting bureaucracy that exists to feed itself – the Iron Law applies to all bureaucracies – and it goes where the money is, but along a path of least resistance, meaning that it will seek revenue where it can get it. That usually means from the middle classes. They have the money and it isn’t concentrated enough to let them hire mercenaries to defend them. It’s harder to despoil Warren Buffet than it is the local dentist or dry goods merchant. (And for those interested in a Marxist view of the the growth of bureaucracy, see Djilas The New Class.)

As A Farewell to Alms shows, for almost all human history that we know, including pre-history as we understand it, from the times of the Babylonians and Ur of the Chaldees, from the Mycenaeans to the Romans, from the Early Dynasties to the Ming and Ching, from the Norman Conquest to Disraeli, most of the populations of the world lived at the edge of subsistence. Sometimes things got better. The Black Death produced a period of relative prosperity for the common family because labor got scarce – but they generally settled back to usual, with the vast majority having barely enough to eat, a change of clothing, a roof, and a life that was full of works and days, of toil that ceased not unto the grave, and was relatively short, particularly after one could no longer work. Of course there existed a class who had much better; the novels of Jane Austen will tell you a great deal about that – but they were really a rather small part of the population. That’s all rigorously documented in A Farewell to Alms.

The Industrial Revolution changed all that, but it has brought us Global Warming and Climate Change, and we must dismantle this evil lest we all perish. We must change our ways, and fast.

If the climate prediction models are correct, then China and India and Brazil will someday realize that and cut back, perhaps joining the US in imposing the Green Revolution on all the other up and coming developing nations that don’t understand that burning coal, feeding animals, and consuming beyond sustainable means, is fatal for the world.

If the climate models are not correct, then China, Brazil, and India will continue to raise production. Perhaps they will have enough surplus to allow them to take pity on the United States and send us their scraps.

clip_image002[3]

I was looking for material on Wittfogel to link to, and tried my own web site, where I found http://www.jerrypournelle.com/archives2/archives2view/view148.html which has a very small remark about Karl, but is interesting as a world view taken before September 11, 2001. At one point I remark about China policy and US options on what we might do with, to, or about China. One may note that those options are not so available as they used to be. All in all, I find I wasn’t all that wrong in my views of the world way back then when the nation was rich and not deep in debt. There’s also a short speculation about the causes of schizophrenia which is still unrefuted…

See also http://www.jerrypournelle.com/archives2/archives2view/view148.html#loony and why you might not want to hang around with crazy people.

While we are reminiscing on old essays, you may find amusing the 2009 comments on President Obama and the continuing campaign, and what his program looked like back then.

http://www.jerrypournelle.com/view/2009/Q1/view562.html#Friday

clip_image002[4]

fabuloussmooth@yahoo.com is an account that no longer exists. Please send me your change of address.

clip_image002[5]

clip_image004

clip_image002[6]

VAT, Bunnies, DC Mail 20110826

Mail 689 Friday, August 26, 2011

clip_image002

Value Added Tax

Dr. Pournelle:

As I understand it, the Value ADDED Tax is seen as a sales tax only by the end user.

All the rest of the way up the production, distribution, and sales chain, the value ADDED at each step must be computed. The businessman is supposed to get credit for his costs and pay tax only on his contribution to the value of the product. This sounds to me like a full employment program for tax accountants and government auditors.

It is probably a small matter in comparison with the easy-to-swallow-in-small doses shift of our money to government coffers that the VAT offers. But, like the Bunny Inspectors, these are people we should not have to pay.

I think Dr. Smith, E.E. Smith, that is, had something to say about low taxes due to restriction of the government to its proper sphere of authority. With the remark that if it were not for the space piracy problem it would be necessary to reduce taxes even further to keep too much money from accumulating in the accounts of the Galactic Patrol.

Jim Watson

If government gets more money it will simply spend it, and continue the 7% exponential rise in the size of government. Canada and some Latin American countries seem to be able to reduce their deficits without disaster. Why can’t America?

clip_image002[1]

Food "insecurity"

"As many as 17 million children nationwide are struggling with what is known as food insecurity. To put it another way, one in four children in the country is living without consistent access to enough nutritious food to live a healthy life…"

What you have to do is look for the keywords in this statement. Such as "insecurity", and "nutritious", and "healthy".

What they’re saying here is not that people can’t get enough raw calories to stay alive. What they’re saying is that they can’t get the *right* *kind* of food, i.e. the food that the government thinks you ought to be eating instead of the food you actually prefer.

Or, in the case of most lower-income folks, the food that’s all you have *time* to eat. When you have twenty minutes to get from your first-shift job at the law office to your second-shift job at Safeway, you haven’t got time to prepare and cook a meal with plenty of vegetables and few starches or saturated fats. You’re going to buy something you can eat with one hand while you drive.

Mike T. Powers

clip_image002[2]

When bunny inspectors just won’t do

I am so glad the feds are available to save us from ourselves.

http://www.ultimate-guitar.com/news/general_music_news/gibson_factory_raided_by_fbi.html

A.S. Clifton

clip_image002[3]

Housing

Jerry,

You said,

"I do not know the origin of the right to have a house, nor of the obligation for someone else to pay for it."

The Realpolitik answer is Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, et al’s desire to buy votes with the public purse.

I have to agree that the Constitutional basis is murky…let me see:

It has nothing to do with laying taxes or providing for the common defense.

In the short term, it certainly is beneficial to the welfare of those of receive this largess, but is detrimental to the persons who have paid the bill (and in the long term, most of the ostensible beneficiaries have also suffered), so it is hard to argue that it has provided for the general welfare.

It has certainly benefited from the power to borrow money, but one should not borrow money just because one can.

Building materials are articles of commerce, but there is a large step from regulating commerce to stimulating or mandating it (as several Courts have pointed out in re: Obamacare).

A lot of the beneficiaries hare further benefited from lax enforcement of the laws of naturalization and laws of bankruptcy, but again it is hard to see how not enforcing the law is a power of Congress.

If the intent has been to inflate the value of the coin of the United States, then it’s been a winner.

For that matter, it has also empowered the Fed to counterfeit money (aka quantitative easing, whereby the counterfeit is given the same value — deflated — as the previous fiat money).

Given the number of homes in Hollywood which have been forced into foreclosure, I guess for a time it promoted the Useful Arts.

I will say the one can make no argument one way or the other about Piracies committed on the high seas. There are other, metaphorical Piracies which one might claim to have benefited, but again, I don’t think the purpose of the enumerated power was to help the pirates.

Again, I don’t see how the war powers are enforced by this.

And last, they might have done this for the District of Columbia, but not for the rest of the country.

Jim

As a general principle, let Washington demonstrate its superior abilities by demonstrating them in the District of Columbia, where the Congress has the power of dictatorship if it wants it; and certainly has the Constitutional right to spend money on things like education. When DC has the best schools in the country then we might well want to listen to the Department of Education on how to run the schools in the states. Last I heard, Congress isn’t doing any better job of educating its direct subjects in the District than any State is doing. Perhaps they just don’t know how?

clip_image002[4]

Glen Reynolds today

http://www.pjtv.com/?cmd=mpg&mpid=86

An excellent presentation on government intervention in the economy.

Phil

Glen is always worth paying attention to. I don’t as a rule watch many presentations, though. I’m a word man…

clip_image002[5]

Free people are not equal, and equal people are not free

Jerry,

You comment that you could not find a source for this made me curious. This lead me to Lawrence Reed and the “Seven Principles of Sound Public Policy”

http://www.gppf.org/pub/seven_principles.htm

1) Free people are not equal, and equal people are not free.

2) What belongs to you, you tend to take care of; what belongs to no one or everyone tends to fall into disrepair.

3) Sound policy requires that we consider long-run effects and all people, not simply short-run effects and a few people.

4) If you encourage something, you get more of it; if you discourage something, you get less of it.

5) Nobody spends somebody else’s money as carefully as he spends his own.

6) Government has nothing to give anybody except what it first takes from somebody, and a government that’s big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take away everything you’ve got.

7) Liberty makes all the difference in the world.

Mike Plaster

I have been saying that Free men are not equal and equal men are not free for long enough that I do not say “people”. The English language has always recognized that “men” and “mankind” includes both sexes, and I have known these principles from well before the fad of saying “his or her”, or Damon Knight’s made up pronoun yeye came into use. The general principles can be gathered from Aristotle and Cicero, but they are not in that succinct form. I learned that concise form a long time ago, probably in a political philosophy seminar.

clip_image002[6]

The dose is the poison

Hello Jerry

I believe there is a saying that suggests it is not the substance itself that is poisonous but the amount. Feed a lab rat enough of any substance and cancer, liver/kidney failure, blindness, etc… will result.

Could it not be the same way with government borrow and spend? too much is a bad thing?

Numquam satis – slogan of the Obama administration

"Politicians are worse than thieves. At least when thieves take your money, they don’t expect you to thank them for it." Walter Williams

The dose makes the poison is an old maxim of pharmacy. I hadn’t thought of it as applying to government, but of course it does.

clip_image002[7]

clip_image004

clip_image002[8]