Mr. Mohammed’s Cool Clock, and various other matters.

Chaos Manor View, Monday, September 21, 2015

bubbles

This morning Roberta was going out for an errand, and her car alarm went off and stayed on long enough to worry me, so I went out just in time to see her driving off with a cheery wave. The weather was sunny and warm, but there was a cool breeze, so I took the opportunity to take my wheeled walker for a three mile walk. Yesterday was over 100 and debilitating, and I was beginning to feel like a vegetable. The walk went well, I was able to do a series of stretches on the low wall near what used to be a Catholic High School, and came back exhausted but feeling better. Now it’s cooling fast outside, and clouding up, and we may get some much needed rain.

Anyway I walked three miles and stretched well, the day is cooling down, and I no longer feel like a wilted vegetable.

bubbles

The daily Time Warner 4 PM net slowdown has begun. We’ll see how long it lasts.

I see that the hoopla over the “cool clock” has slowed down a bit, although the Council on American Islamic Relations is doing its best to keep it open. And, of course, there are those who say this is just a story of a bright kid and stupid police:

About Ahmed Mohammed’s clock

Dear Jerry Pournelle:
Some of your correspondents propose a conspiracy theory of Ahmed Mohammed’s clock: that the outrage over this display of teacher-and-cop stupidity was preplanned. I’m glad that at least we all agree that the teacher-and-cop stupidity was authentic. The outrage in response was swift and thorough; which some of your correspondents think proves that it was orchestrated beforehand.
I think that the media was indeed prepared, but not in detail, just in general. I imagine that somewhere in the White House database there’s an app titled “What To Say When Authorities Do Something Moronic To A Child”. It has blanks to fill in; times, names, places. It also has checklists: sex/fear/religion/dissent as ostensible cause of officious idiocy; white/black/brown/Hispanic/Native-American/Moslem/Asian target of officious idiocy; male/female/gay/lesbian/trans gender of target; 1-5 / 6-10 / 11-14 / 15-20  as age of target; dirt-poor/middle-class/regular-rich/stinking-rich as wealth of target child’s family; inconvenience/humiliation/imprisonment/injury/death inflicted on target child by moronic authorities. Fill in the blanks, complete the checklist, click ‘compile’, and the robot will write the story automatically.
I theorize that this app is owned by the New York Times and many other media outlets. The media compiled and distributed this idiocy-mocking app for the same reason that firefighters collect fire-fighting equipment. Firefighters don’t know where the next fire will be; nor do reporters know where the next outbreak of violent official incompetence will be; but both know that it will happen, and both know from experience what to do the next time it does happen. Be Prepared.
My own view of the event is filtered through the lens of nerd solidarity.  Sure the teachers and cops were afraid of a skinny 14-year-old boy; but their imaginary bomb was just an excuse. What really terrorized them was the lad’s intelligence. Since competence is not, technically, a crime, those frightened by it must find other charges to press. Fortunately for them, “scary technical skill” is now a prosecutable offense.
Sincerely,
Paradoctor

Before I publish this, are you convinced that the Texas authorities acted moronically?  He was charged, not with making a bomb, but with making a fake bomb.  He repeatedly was uncooperative with the authorities before he was arrested; in particular he would never say why he brought a bomb-looking object – it looks like NCIS or any other TV show bomb – to school on 9/11. He just insisted it was a clock.

I fail to see the intelligence they impute to him.  My boys could have made that gadget when 14, given that it was for sale on eBay.  It was a bit more realistic than a box with a fuse sticking out of it, but it looked like it was intended to fool the naïve into thinking it was a fake bomb. The police thought that was what it was, and it is unlawful to bring fake bomb anywhere with the intent to scare anyone.  Maybe it’s a bad law, maybe not, but you sure would not take that thing on an airplane.

Jerry Pournelle

Chaos Manor

About Ahmed Mohammed’s clock

Yes, I am convinced that the Texas authorities earned their laughing-stock status. I hear that five of the teachers he showed his science project to were fine with it; but an English teacher freaked out, and the rest is history.
Anyone can make a mistake; so as soon as the cops noticed that the clock was ticking up and not down, it was time for them to back off. But no, they’re the type of authorities who cannot make a mistake; and being a brown Moslem teen too scared to utter the word ‘bomb’ is proof of guilt.
It really was a clock, so he told the truth; and he didn’t intend any scary hoax. But the cops hoaxed themselves; and being scary is a crime proven by the accusation. Truth and evidence are beside the point, as is the presumption of innocence.
I charge Ahmed Mohammed with ignorance; of Texan bigotry, of Texan anti-intellectualism, of 9/11 defeat-celebration theatrics, and of the blindness of power. Fortunately ignorance is correctable by education; which this experience certainly gave him.

Paradoctor

Thank you for being clear in stating your opinion of the capabilities and attitudes of the police officers whose duty is to keep the peace. I do not agree. It is clear they did not think that pencil box with its ugly contents was a bomb, and they did not treat the incident as a bomb. They thought, as I would have thought, that looked like a fake bomb, and they acted accordingly. They gave him ample opportunity to explain why he would bring an object that eerily resembled most of the bombs you see on TV action adventures to school on 9/11. He did not cooperate, but insisted that it was a clock. He would have had to be very naïve and somewhat retarded not to recognize that nearly everyone would get the first impression that it was in fact a bomb, but he kept insisting that it was a clock.

He had taken a working clock and turned it into a mess; not a crime, but hardly an act worthy of White House commendation, and hardly worthy of the Presidential comment about a cool clock. There is no crime in that; there is no crime in taking it to school unless he intended it to be taken for a bomb; and once again the police acted accordingly, questioning him about his intention. Under Texas law, is a crime to scare people with a fake bomb. That was explained to him. He grinned and said it was a clock.

He and his cool clock were removed from the school. At the police station the handcuffs were removed. So far he had not been photographed in handcuffs, but at the police station young Mohammed’s father insisted that they be put back on him so that his sister could photograph him in handcuffs. The police naively complied.

Somehow the news of all this reached the President of the United States and the President saw fit to postpone whatever he was working on and take time to pay attention to this case. My experience has been that getting the attention of the President requires either an actual pressing emergency, or scheduling and preparation; the Council on American Islamic Relations had no problem getting his attention, although the urgency of the matter is not very clear; prior scheduling seems at least as reasonable. Whereupon the President invites this young clock hobbyist to the White House, and various other important people issue invitations and offers.

It was all spontaneous and you can believe as much of that as you want to.

Blackguarding our defenders is hardly new. For a great reading of Kipling’s poem, try https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNMHOc9xfKQ

From Frank Gaffney, but if the content is even about half true — and I haven’t endeavored to fact-checked — then there is much, much more to this than CNN will want us to know.

http://www.kaufmancountytparty.org/high-school-students-clock/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=socialnetwork

Richard White

Austin, Texas

And that may be enough about the young Mr. Mohammed, his politician father, the Council on American Islamic Relations, and the suddenly instantly available President of the United States.

You’ve seen this link before, but it’s still relevant if a bit long. http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/2015/09/17/reverse-engineering-ahmed-mohameds-clock-and-ourselves/

bubbles

bubbles

bubbles

bubbles

There are no surprises here, and I think no comment is needed.

: Lion hunts and good intentions

Dear Dr. Pournelle,

Good intentions without prudence do not always yield good results. This one took me by surprise.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/13/world/a-hunting-ban-saps-a-villages-livelihood.html

Evidently a number of localities banned trophy hunting in the wake of last year’s killing of Cecil. 

Guess what? MORE lions are dying since then, not fewer.
Why? 
Because the people who lived there viewed lions as economic assets so long as they attracted tourists who would shower dollars on their locales in exchange for the head of a predator.   So they would work to conserve them and preserve their numbers. It meant preserving their own livelihoods as well.

Well, guess what? With the end of trophy hunting, the economic value of the lions is zero.  Which means the villagers now regard them as pests who sneak into their farms and murder their cattle.  So they have  no interest in preserving the lions, only in killing them all. And that is what is happening.
There is a similarly related story where “carbon credits” resulted in the burning of an African village so westerners could build a “carbon-friendly” tree farm:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/22/world/africa/in-scramble-for-land-oxfam-says-ugandans-were-pushed-out.html?_r=4&scp=3&sq=uganda&st=cse

Lead me to this conclusion: Whenever first worlders have a moral brainwave, it’s third-worlders who pay the price.

Respectfully,

Brian P.

bubbles

something wonderful: the solar system to scale [buffy willow]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zR3Igc3Rhfg

Paul

bubbles

lovely sunspot article

Dear Sir,

For your reading pleasure: “The 315 Year Old Science Experiment” about accurate sunspot counting across the centuries.

http://nautil.us/issue/22/slow/the-315_year_old-science-experiment

Peroration:
“…the placid mindset of Schwabe, who didn’t need to know what would eventually be found in his data, only that there was merit in observing.”

Respectfully,

/Bob J

Is there a lesson in there?

El Nino

Submitted for your consideration:

http://www.drroyspencer.com/2015/09/uah-v6-0-global-temperature-update-for-aug-2015-0-28-c/

The record 1998 El Nino is labeled and clearly evident. The upticks in the average since generally correspond to weaker El Nino’s according to the timeline of El Ninos on Wikipedia.

Tracking the data on Dr. Spencer’s site, I have yet to see anything that looks like the record El Nino that we’re being warned about.  The recent average is trending upward, but very slowly compared to the other recent El Ninos.

Of course, I could be just another closed-minded official scientist, but I prefer to follow the data.

Jim Woosley

bubbles

TSA Doesn’t Care That Its Luggage Locks Have Been Hacked (Intercept)

Thanks Jerry – I printed a set for myself last week.  It takes a bit of skill and finesse to get usable keys in plastic, but not too bad.  I expect we’ll see them on eBay shortly.

In any case,  I tell folks that by using a non-TSA lock, you at least know it’s been opened, just carry a spare for the return trip.  But for that a Zip-Tie works just as well, and is far cheaper.  It’ll keep a casual thief out, and let you know if someone got in.  Kind of like leaving a light on your porch turned on when someone else leaves theirs off.

To be fair though, no luggage is secure.   If it’s important, don’t check the bag.

Cheers,

Doug

TSA Doesn’t Care That Its Luggage Locks Have Been Hacked
https://theintercept.com/2015/09/16/tsa-doesnt-really-care-luggage-locks-hacked/
In a spectacular failure of a “back door” designed to give law enforcement exclusive access to private places, hackers have made the “master keys” for Transportation Security Administration-recognized luggage locks available to anyone with a 3D printer.
The TSA-recognized luggage locks were a much-vaunted solution to a post-9/11 conundrum: how to let people lock their luggage, on the one hand, but let the TSA inspect it without resorting to bolt cutters, on the other.
When the locks were first introduced in 2003, TSA official Ken Lauterstein described them as part of the agency’s efforts to develop “practical solutions that contribute toward our goal of providing world-class security and world-class customer service.”
Now that they’ve been hacked, however, TSA says it doesn’t really care one way or another.
“The reported ability to create keys for TSA-approved suitcase locks from a digital image does not create a threat to aviation security,” wrote TSA spokesperson Mike England in an email to The Intercept.
“These consumer products are ‘peace of mind’ devices, not part of TSA’s aviation security regime,” England wrote.
“Carried and checked bags are subject to the TSA’s electronic screening and manual inspection. In addition, the reported availability of keys to unauthorized persons causes no loss of physical security to bags while they are under TSA control. In fact, the vast majority of bags are not locked when checked in prior to flight.”
In other words: not our problem.

bubbles

Snowflakes & Hot House Flowers

Jerry,

You posted in

<https://www.jerrypournelle.com/chaosmanor/climate-and-el-nio-and-other-matters/>

Climate and El Niño; And other matters

“I have removed by popular request a picture of the celebration of the attack on America on 911 2001.”

I did not think your readership had so many snowflakes and hot house flowers.

What is next? Trigger warnings?

Regards, Charles Adams, Bellevue, NE

bubbles

war equals refugees

Dr. Pournelle,
Another correspondent objected to my scenario, written a week to ten days ago, where I attempted to point out that Russia is in position to intervene in the Mid-East.
Mine was one of a series of e-mails that were intended to show that the future is still uncertain, and based around several ideas, one being that a SAC-like deterrent force evolved to counter Stalin in the 40’s would not be appropriate today, nor might it be directed at Russia. Is it even possible that Russia will be a point of stability?
Since I wrote those, Russia has deployed military assets to support Assad in Syria — basically, Putin (sometimes referred to — by me — as Czar Vladimir I) has picked a side.
The U.S. and Europe did not pick a side in Syria. Now both are receiving refugees. Now Vlad I can set the pace. He can also leverage his position in Syria to guarantee refugees do not leave, possibly endearing himself to Europe, or at least solidifying his political position in Eastern Ukraine as quid pro quo.
Vlad I has had a successful record, given a certain definition of success, with dealing with unrest from his internal Muslim population. One wonders if he is ruthless and focused enough to take that show on the road.
Russia could guarantee Turkey’s Southern border while the latter settles its internal conflicts, and thereby insert the point of the wedge to break up NATO.
Russia could guarantee Greece’s debt, driving the wedge in further while consolidating its own majority ownership of the Black Sea.
Russia could continue South, bringing Lebanon and Gaza under its influence, thereby becoming Israel’s protector. Perhaps Vlad I will also use his imperial ambitions and position to influence Tehran?
I don’t think I’m advocating a war, just observing current events, obvious capabilities, and apparent intentions, although admittedly from my own somewhat jaded perspective. As I think I said, my “predictions” were likely to be wrong and not really intended as such, but even if 10% were potentially true, the new strategy will have to be much different from that of 60-70 years ago. If Russia becomes a stabilizing influence, a strategy of containment might be counter-productive. If there is no NATO, nothing says that EU will be a U.S. ally. If enough E.U. countries begin to chafe under what is essentially the direction of the now combined France and Germany, how long will it stand as an alliance?
Putin is already demonstrably un-intimidated by the new brinkmanship, and responded to Secretary Kerry’s (oh, so obviously empty) threat to deploy U.S. nukes to Poland by threatening to use tactical nukes to defend the “breakaway” portion of Ukraine. The old deterrence is broken – do you wonder what the new one will be like? I can’t think of any ways that it will be pretty, or peaceful.
The e-mail discussion did inspire me to write up some of my ideas and many of your words into a science fiction short story, submitted for TWBW volume 10. Perhaps it will be good enough for publication, but perhaps not.
Regardless of my advocacy (it wasn’t) for, or opposition to violent conflict, it is simple observation that there will be war — heck, there already is. I’m pretty certain I didn’t start it, but to ignore it would be, at minimum, silly. As would be the position that U.S. foreign policy since the millennium has had nothing to do with creating the current situation; I think that the other correspondent and I might agree on that.
-d

We can agree on your titular premise. I see Putin as a PanSlavic Patriot, interested in breaking encirclement and other traditional concerns of Russia; and his interests don’t particularly conflict with ours except when we choose that path as Clinton did in the Balkans. I, like a lot of the ruling class, have considerable sentimental attachment to the Baltic Republics, but I also have a realistic view of Eastern European affairs, which we have little business justifying involvement. We have common interests with Putin in providing Middle Easter stability and safety for Christians and Jews in that area. Call it common interests of Western Civilization.

Of course Liberalism remains a philosophy of consolation for the West as it commits suicide.

bubbles

bubbles

bubbles

bubbles

Tommy

By Rudyard Kipling

I went into a public-‘ouse to get a pint o’ beer,
The publican ‘e up an’ sez, “We serve no red-coats here.”
The girls be’ind the bar they laughed an’ giggled fit to die,
I outs into the street again an’ to myself sez I:

O it’s Tommy this, an’ Tommy that, an’ “Tommy, go away”;
But it’s “Thank you, Mister Atkins”, when the band begins to play,
The band begins to play, my boys, the band begins to play,
O it’s “Thank you, Mister Atkins”, when the band begins to play.

I went into a theatre as sober as could be,
They gave a drunk civilian room, but ‘adn’t none for me;
They sent me to the gallery or round the music-‘alls,
But when it comes to fightin’, Lord! they’ll shove me in the stalls!

For it’s Tommy this, an’ Tommy that, an’ “Tommy, wait outside”;
But it’s “Special train for Atkins” when the trooper’s on the tide,
The troopship’s on the tide, my boys, the troopship’s on the tide,
O it’s “Special train for Atkins” when the trooper’s on the tide.

Yes, makin’ mock o’ uniforms that guard you while you sleep
Is cheaper than them uniforms, an’ they’re starvation cheap;
An’ hustlin’ drunken soldiers when they’re goin’ large a bit
Is five times better business than paradin’ in full kit.

Then it’s Tommy this, an’ Tommy that, an’ “Tommy, ‘ow’s yer soul?”
But it’s “Thin red line of ‘eroes” when the drums begin to roll,
The drums begin to roll, my boys, the drums begin to roll,
O it’s “Thin red line of ‘eroes” when the drums begin to roll.

We aren’t no thin red ‘eroes, nor we aren’t no blackguards too,
But single men in barricks, most remarkable like you;
An’ if sometimes our conduck isn’t all your fancy paints,
Why, single men in barricks don’t grow into plaster saints;

While it’s Tommy this, an’ Tommy that, an’ “Tommy, fall be’ind”,
But it’s “Please to walk in front, sir”, when there’s trouble in the wind,
There’s trouble in the wind, my boys, there’s trouble in the wind,
O it’s “Please to walk in front, sir”, when there’s trouble in the wind.

You talk o’ better food for us, an’ schools, an’ fires, an’ all:
We’ll wait for extry rations if you treat us rational.
Don’t mess about the cook-room slops, but prove it to our face
The Widow’s Uniform is not the soldier-man’s disgrace.

For it’s Tommy this, an’ Tommy that, an’ “Chuck him out, the brute!”
But it’s “Saviour of ‘is country” when the guns begin to shoot;
An’ it’s Tommy this, an’ Tommy that, an’ anything you please;
An’ Tommy ain’t a bloomin’ fool — you bet that Tommy sees!

http://www.poetryloverspage.com/poets/kipling/tommy.html

bubbles

Freedom is not free. Free men are not equal. Equal men are not free.

bubbles

clip_image002

bubbles

Refugees, Fusion, Peace and Islam, and other maily mail

Chaos Manor Mail, Sunday, September 20, 2015

We have overflowing mail boxes, and it’s time to clean some of them out. This will be a mixed bag, generally with short shrift, for which I apologize. Many of these were put aside because I thought they deserved a longer answer or comment than I had time to give; then they were left to fester as I had various other assaults on my time. They didn’t deserve that treatment, but I fear my time is limited what with the fiction projects, and There Will Be War. But I had such good intentions…

bubbles

Once upon a time, the World economy followed the same pattern, called the Malthusian World. The primary characteristic was that the vast majority of people lived at a starvation level. There was also a very small group of people who did quite well for themselves. Any small increase in food was quickly followed by a population increase, and living standards stayed the same. (This pattern still exists in some parts of the world.)
Then in Scotland about 250 years ago, the industrial revolution kicked off. The economic result of the industrial revolution was a much faster growth in the GDP. Population could not grow fast enough to absorb the new productivity, and a new phenomena developed, the growing middle class. And as GDP continued to grow, so did the middle class.
Recently, for a variety of reasons, GDP is not growing at the same rate as prior periods. (Before you blame Obama, this is a decades long tend.) This has been followed by a shrinking middle class.
It seems to me that there is a connection between GDP growth and income inequality. Unfortunately, the people who are complaining about income inequality are proposing solutions which dampen GDP growth. As we slide back to the Malthusian World, remember what road is paved with good intentions.

Fredrik

I can briefly summarize what happened to prosperity: we had a reasonably normal business cycle, government panicked on the last downturn, and then came Hope and Change, designed to eliminate the business cycle and income disparities. Regulations flowed forth, and we have yet to recover from that despite vast increases in productivity (think Moore’s Law) because the regulations are good at keeping regulators employed, but their map is not the economic territory. We will have more employment when the regulations stop making it so hard to employ someone without risking prosecution.

bubbles

Hope for the Future – Just Maybe…
Jerry,
As you’ve mentioned many times, cheap,readily available energy has been the key most of our progress the last 200-300 years. That paradigm has been under attack the last 30 years and I suspect there are many special interest groups that would like to see us take a ‘giant leap backwards’ to say the early 1800s. They of course have no interest in seeing humanity harness fusion power.
Cheap, clean, readily available fusion based power dooms large swaths of the left. Well, there may still be reason to hope. Here is the link to an interview with
Jaeyoung Park, president and chief scientist at EMC2.
Fusion: Are We There Yet?
SEPTEMBER 9, 2015 • MICHAEL S. FISCHER
…. “Fusion has been talked about for many years, and it disappointed a lot of people,” says Jaeyoung Park, president and chief scientist at EMC2, a California company that is hoping to tap private investment capital to support its fusion research. “Now we’re on the other side of it. With all the technologies available now, it has become a great time to do fusion research.” ….
EMC2 has been conducting U.S. Navy-supported research for two decades on a reactor called the polywell, which combines two fusion technologies: electron beams to heat plasma to 100 million degrees and a magnetic bottle to confine the hot plasma. According to a Navy review, the company’s scientists have validated these ideas, and next they must demonstrate that the technologies can support a fusion reaction—the last step before possible commercialization in the form of an electricity-producing reactor….
The Investment
EMC2 is seeking private investment for a three-year, $30 million commercial research program to prove the polywell can work as a nuclear fusion power generator. “We have had a 20-year involvement by the Navy, and it has been a very productive relationship,” says Park. “We were able to address a lot of basic scientific questions.” He understands that at this point, the company has to give up its government subsidy and seek private funding. “The Navy’s view is that they will provide transitional funds, but it’s time for us to go out on our own,” he says. “In their view, we’re becoming an adult.”
Park hopes to appeal to deep-pocket individual investors, as well as family offices and foundations that are committed to solving the energy problem—“people who look at this as their responsibility and their destiny,” he says. “It’s our generation’s job to solve the energy problem. Whenever we created energy in the past, we created pollution and created problems about sustainability, and we’ve done that for more than 200 years.”
An investment in the program is not for the fainthearted, Park freely admits. “People ask whether there are any applications in the middle [before building a reactor], and there aren’t many,” he says. “So it’s a very high-risk and high-return proposition.”
Investors will have full access to the energy production potential of fusion technology, where the biggest impact of the fusion is expected to be. EMC2 owns 100% of the intellectual property from its research. The Navy has licensing rights for specific applications it orders. EMC2 will keep confidential a small segment of the technology that is unique and critical to the Navy.
The $30 million phase will complete the last remaining technical milestone before EMC2 embarks on the development of a reactor. Park’s ambition is to see the company’s first reactor on the grid in about 10 years, and almost immediately start to replace coal-based power plants. “That will be the first target because among power sources, that’s the worst one,” he says. “We’ll probably replace nuclear fission, because although its contribution has been great, it’s time to replace it with a better technology.” He also expects the reactor to complement other energy sources, such as solar and wind, and begin to phase out natural gas and the fossil fuels.
Many power plants exist around the world. “How fast we’re going to replace them is going to be market driven, how much each country will invest to replace those old technology power plants and put in this one,” Park says. He estimates that an achievable goal is to replace 20% to 40% of the global electricity market in 20 to 30 years.
Park acknowledges this will be a huge undertaking. “A reactor doesn’t get built very quickly,” he says. That will require a significant infusion of capital, on the order of $200 million to $300 million, he says. He envisions teaming up with an existing energy player. In that event, EMC2 might issue the company 20% to 30% of its shares, and an investor could make an early exit.
As a government-funded entity, a company such as EMC2 carries extra credibility when approaching private funders, according to Michael Delage, vice president of technology and corporate strategy at General Fusion, which is 80% privately funded by venture capital funds and family offices. It also receives government funding from Sustainable Development Technology Canada and from several research and development programs.
“Being able to leverage government is helpful; it’s good for helping investors to see that you’re able to leverage their dollars,” says Delage. “SDTC actually requires that, so for every dollar they are willing to put in, you must match that with at least two dollars of private capital. The two catalyze each other.”
Park is optimistic about the success of EMC2’s long endeavor. “With investments in fusion power now that will pay off in dividends later, we could potentially see in our own future the implementation of one of the cheapest, most sustainable and powerful energies,” he says. That would not only provide electricity and broaden access to clean water through seawater desalination, but also help emerging and established countries overcome energy consumption issues and build on other energy-based endeavors.
“This is something we can do,” Park says. “We can make a real difference—and [investors] may be able to make a large sum of money. But more than anything else, they can tell their children that this was something they did and are proud of it.”
Link to complete interview:
http://www.fa-mag.com/news/fusion–are-we-there-yet-23010.html?section=49
We may yet see fusion power on the grid, despite our governments best efforts to the contrary.
Tony Sherfinski

For most of my life, fusion power on the grid has been thirty years away. Sometimes “only” thirty year away, sometimes “a long 30” years away, but thirty year. Perhaps this time for sure? But I have chased this dream before.

bubbles

war equals refugees

One of your readers wrote: “While Western Europe are involved with the influx of refugees created by their collective failure to intervene in the Middle East, Russia may get the opportunity to come to the rescue. It will depend entirely on how Russia can spin its relationship with conservative (as opposed to radical) Muslims.”
The refugees flooding Germany are coming from (among other places) Syria, Turkey, Iraq, Libya, Kosovo, Serbia, and Ukraine.
It is very disturbing to me to see people push more wars as a way to reduce the number of refugees. It is not a “collective failure to intervene in the Middle East” (or anywhere else) that is causing the problems. It is the US and European desire to destabilize all these countries by funding Islamic radicals (also known as “moderates”) that has caused this entire mess.
It is America’s now 15-year-old policy (as Steve Sailer puts it) of “invade the world, invite the world” that is causing the problems. And intentionally so.

Mike Patton

Dr Pournelle,
A handful of Saudis attacked us so we invaded Iraq & Afghanistan.
The end result was a whole lot of borrowed money changed hands & a state issued photo ID is necessary to travel.

Rob

‘Refugees’, eh?

<http://www.theaustralian.com.au/in-depth/europes-migrant-crisis/migrant-crisis-father-of-dead-toddler-a-people-smuggler/story-fnws9k7b-1227523338355?nk=b3c19d16c3ca74acbacfefdf6c8fffbc-1441979163>

—————————————

Roland Dobbins

Another ‘Well Duh!’ moment

Hello Jerry,

I doubt that I am the first to forward this to you, but just in case:

http://allenbwest.com/2015/09/whoa-50-military-intel-chiefs-just-revolted-against-obama/

Two quotes from the article:

“This is not by accident from the Obama administration, nor an untended consequence: this is intended. President Obama has little or no interest in containing ISIS or Iran. And to those of you who are saying he is correct and we should just stay out of it – there’s just one thing to remember: Obama created the mess. And his creation has now spread, by way of migration, into Europe and potentially to the United States. “

and

“And have y’all noticed, the predominant demographic of “folks” escaping Syria and Iraq are not elderly, women, and children…they are young men?”

To quote another of your correspondents, James Crawford, and apropos of our sporadic discussion of how to explain the policies of the Obamunists since the ‘Coup of 2008’:  “There is a point where incompetence becomes so egregious that it is indistinguishable from malice.”

Bob Ludwick

bubbles

Malice and incompetence
I recently used the “Never ascribe” quote and attributed it, as you do, to Napoleon. In reply, someone pointed me to the Wikipedia article on Hanlon’s Razor.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor
Interestingly, it doesn’t mention Napoleon at all, but may trace it back to Goethe in 1774.
Having read the others, I still like the Napoleon version better. Incompetence and stupidity are not the same thing.

Fredrik Coulter

I do not rely on Wikipedia; I know when Napoleon said it, to whom he said, and of whom he said it. He may have been quoting Goethe but I never heard that. Where and to whom did Goethe say that? The phrase in question is “Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence.”

bubbles

Syrians

Jerry
You may find the linked essay of interest. There is a comment that reminds me of your own thoughts:
Indeed, it has struck me that all these hordes of strong, healthy young men could be received in Europe on the one condition they be impressed into military service for the relief of their homelands. For surely under European discipline and direction they could be forged into a formidable fighting force, allied with us instead of with our deadliest enemies.
http://www.davidwarrenonline.com/2015/09/13/misrepresentations/
Mike

If we want Legions, and the ability to govern without the consent of the governed. We know much about competent empire; America was an experiment in rule by the consent of the governed. Has it had it’s day?

bubbles

‘He said the scale of the egg lobby’s retaliation against his company’s rise was “hard to wrap your head around”.’

<http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/sep/06/usda-american-egg-board-paid-bloggers-hampton-creek>

It’s hard to wrap my head around the concept of an ‘egg lobby’, much less a Federally-funded covert psyops operations centered on eggs and egg substitutes.

—————————————

Roland Dobbins

bubbles

TSA is worse than it was during the last battery of tests!

<.>

The Transportation Security Administration abysmally failed an internal investigation into its ability to stop undercover Department of Homeland Security agents’ attempts to breach security with potential weapons or bombs, according to an explosive new reportrevealed by ABC News. The report notes that the test exposed the fact that TSA officers at “dozens” of US airports failed to catch DHS “red team” members armed with potential weapons or bombs in 95% of 70 attempts.

</>

http://truthinmedia.com/tsa-fails-dhs-security-test-allows-weapons-bombs-to-breach-security-67-of-70-times/

Next, I suspect we’ll hear cries of budget cuts and calls for further funding to create more of this incompetence. Why does this entity exist?

◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊

Most Respectfully,

Joshua Jordan, KSC

Percussa Resurgo

bubbles

twbw X

Dr. Pournelle,
I phrased my question and my offer badly.  I’m intimidated by attempting to write fiction, and am not sure that I could write a structured essay.  I was offering free help to do any “scut work” you’d care to delegate to an amateur in order to compile a new anthology in the series. 
But I took your response at face value.  I began to wonder how I present some of the things I’d recently written to you in such a way as to be published as an essay.
I couldn’t.  I’d been playing with, speculating about several of ideas that I’ve had for a while: What if Putin isn’t going to go down in history as a villain?  Never mind that I think he’s a thug, from the right perspective, Charlemagne was a thug, as were many other kings, a few queens, and it seems like most of those who aspired to empire.  What if Russia could become a benevolent and stabilizing influence?  Does the empire necessarily only do evil?
Your column (okay, “blog”) has caused me to wonder what a deterrent is.  How does one distinguish between “Weapon of Mass Destruction” and a deterrent? Is the difference only in the eye of the beholder? If gas and bio weapons are wrong, can’t one or the other be used as a deterrent?  Why could I accept SAC and USAFE nuclear weapons as a deterring force, back in my relative youth, but can’t understand it now?
What is a deterrent strategy?  I still don’t know — I’m beginning to thing the two terms cancel each other.  If one has a strategy, it should be to accomplish something specific and not to prevent an opponent from doing something that is vaguely or loosely defined.  A strategy statement should not depend only on what an opponent might do – otherwise, all strategies could be completely defined as “the other guy loses.”   It ought to be able to at least start a description of a strategy by “This is how we’re going to win.” 
What if the one to be deterred is your boss?
The objective has to be stated in the strategy.  Otherwise, it’s just cheer leading.    Cheerleaders have their place, but I don’t confuse a heartfelt motto with an achievable goal.
I’m also beginning to try to apply an engineering standard for requirements to strategy: it should be clear, atomic, and testable (requirement definition gurus have seven or more standards for a good requirement, but I think those three are enough).  I can’t think of a way to state a future strategy of deterrence so that is clear, atomic (in that it has a single effect and purpose), and/or achievable in a way that can be tested for effectiveness.  I certainly can’t think how to state STRATCOM’s strategy in simple terms — who’s the bad guy, again?
Letters and e-mails don’t scare me as much as attempting fiction, and I do sometimes do composition for technical writing.
I couldn’t think how to capture my thoughts or our series of e-mails, so because of your response, I started an attempt to write fiction.  It is harder than I thought it would be.  I’ve sent a more-or-less 9000 word draft story (working title “They Also Serve”) to the twbw X e-mail address.  I’ve not done my best editing on it, but I remembered late that you and Mr. Heinlein advise against editing without promise of payment.  If you think it may be worth publishing, I think it could be improved.  In the remote circumstance that it becomes publishable, I’m comfortable with associating my name with the work.
Renewing my original offer (this time for sure) with hope for a little more clarity, I’m still volunteering to do pre-publication “scut work” that might be needed. I do not wish to receive credit for this work, I think that I’d be gratified just to take some small part in the project. 
I think that I’m a good copy editor (for other people’s work) and I can do some research.  I don’t know what else I could do that might be needed, but I’ll give it a shot.
A caveat — I am returning to the regular work force after my two-year vacation.  I’ve accepted a (real) job near by, and will be doing systems engineering again.  This will affect the time that I have available, but I’d still like to help.
I thank you again for deciding to continue the series.  I think it is important.
-d

Writing requires diligence and self-motivation; writers must write.  If 90% of success in life is showing up, getting it written is the equivalent of showing up,, Good luck.  I left systems engineering when they wanted me to go into management; I loved OR work, but not management, and decided to try professoring. That led to writing…

bubbles

A View on Islam

I read this comment in response to a story about Al Qaeda calling for lone wolf attacks in the United States:

<.>

I’ve come to the conclusion that there is a certain level of fatalism amongst the Muslim community. Comments and explanations regarding the crane accident in Saudi Arabia sum it up. It seems everything that happens comes down to the will of Allah. So, if you’re a Muslim, what’s to protest? The Twin Towers? Hey, it was the will of Allah. If it wasn’t, it wouldn’t have happened. A bit perverse way of brushing off events, but it explains why the Muslim community doesn’t get in a tizzy over some of these events. I guess if we were to obliterate some of their communities in response to terror attacks on us they would just have to accept our response as the will of Allah. Write that on the warhead: Will of Allah! I mean, if that warhead aimed at Tehran hits its target, it was the will of Allah. If for some uncanny reason the warhead veers off course and hits Tel Aviv, it was the will of Allah. Some day we’ll see what the will of Allah is.

</>

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/al-qaeda-chief-urges-lone-wolf-attacks-u-152455108.html

His conclusion on fatalism is not unfounded. Everything happens “God willing” in the Muslim world. Everything is in the hands of God.

Whatever happens, it is the will of God and you must submit or surrender — Islam means submission or surrender. Closely related to Islam is the word “salam” for peace. This is where “religion of peace” comes from. I suspect the ideals of our respective societies entertain different notions of peace.

◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊

Most Respectfully,

Joshua Jordan, KSC

Percussa Resurgo

The only peace permitted in the Koran is the submission of the infidels; otherwise it is truce. This is the word of the Prophet.

bubbles

Dear Jerry –

While your Salon article on the consequences of the 9/11 attack was certainly worth reading, its basic premise (“Since the World Trade Center bombings, our democracy has come undone. The terrorists accomplished their mission.”) is so wildly inaccurate that a little readily available history seems in order.

So, what did bin Laden want when he took down the Towers? Many folk seem to have forgotten that he is on record on the subject, and the answer has nothing to do with the establishment of a security state in the US. In November of 2002, a letter from bin Laden appeared on a Saudi web site, and was reported (and quoted) in various places, including The Guardian http://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/nov/24/theobserver Somewhat condensed (only the major points are quoted here), bin Laden sets forth his demands:

“As for the second question that we want to answer: What are we calling you to, and what do we want from you?

(1) The first thing that we are calling you to is Islam.

(2) The second thing we call you to, is to stop your oppression, lies, immorality and debauchery that has spread among you.

(3) What we call you to thirdly is to take an honest stance with yourselves – and I doubt you will do so – to discover that you are a nation without principles or manners, and that the values and principles to you are something which you merely demand from others, not that which you yourself must adhere to.

(4) We also advise you to stop supporting Israel, and to end your support of the Indians in Kashmir, the Russians against the Chechens and to also cease supporting the Manila Government against the Muslims in Southern Philippines.

(5) We also advise you to pack your luggage and get out of our lands. We desire for your goodness, guidance, and righteousness, so do not force us to send you back as cargo in coffins.

(6) Sixthly, we call upon you to end your support of the corrupt leaders in our countries. Do not interfere in our politics and method of education. Leave us alone, or else expect us in New York and Washington.

(7) We also call you to deal with us and interact with us on the basis of mutual interests and benefits, rather than the policies of sub dual, theft and occupation, and not to continue your policy of supporting the Jews because this will result in more disasters for you.”

In other words, convert to Islam (bin Laden’s variety), get out of the mid-East (but keep buying oil – at higher prices), and stop supporting Israel. The adoption of security measures which diminish individual freedoms and make terrorist activities against the US more difficult is notably absent from the list. And, except for getting troops out of Saudi Arabia, “the terrorists” have not accomplished their mission.

While I agree with the issues raised in the Salon article, interpreting them as “what the terrorists want” seems, at best, wildly revisionist (and somewhat hysterical), and at worst grossly dishonest. 

Regards,

Jim Martin

What he wanted was the Caliphate, and the fulfillment of the commands in the Koran.

bubbles

bubbles

bubbles

clip_image002 clip_image002[1]

clip_image004

clip_image006

Cool Clocks and AutoComplete and is Microsoft a bureaucracy?

Chaos Manor View, Friday, September 18, 2015

bubbles

“Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded—here and there, now and then—are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.

“This is known as ‘bad luck’.”

– Robert A. Heinlein

bubbles

Weather is nice in Los Angeles. The great cleanup continues. I’m still working on the Monk’s Cell, but it’s pretty functional barring a couch full of old electronics that needs getting rid of when next Eric or Alex are over. I can get up and down stairs, but the only way to carry anything is either in a pocket or in a bag slung around my neck.

But I’m slowly getting organized. There’s something wrong with cut and paste now, and I’m tired of fighting with it. Time to reset – Windows lately needs that a lot.

clip_image002

The Monk’s Cell

And reset did it: prior to reset, I could not copy and paste that picture. I’ve noticed that Microsoft needs that reset far more often lately.

Before I forget: does anyone have a source of ball point springs? Not the larger springs that enable pushbutton clicking; the small springs on the pens that twist to present penpoint. The easiest source is taking them out of old pens, but I lost several – I am really clumsy. Now I need to replace the filler? cartridge? whatever you call that element that contains the point and ink – in one of my favorite pens, a big heavy one that Steve Barnes gave me when I was in the hospital. I have the replacement element but I clumsily lost the spring. I found a Chinese Alibaba that will cheerfully sell me the springs but the minimum order is 10,000 and I think I do not need quite that many, clumsy or not. Amazon doesn’t offer them. I don’t recall them in stationary stores, but I can’t easily get to those anyway.

Lunch time.

bubbles

Early this week I got mail linking me to a story that made my blood boil. A teenage nerd brought a digital clock to school, and the stupid authorities called the cops, who handcuffed him and took him to juvenile detention. Infuriating, but what did you expect from Texas? And the boy was a Muslim, so—

the terrorists have won http://www.dallasnews.com/news/community-news/northwest-dallas-county/headlines/20150915-irving-9th-grader-arrested-after-taking-homemade-clock-to-school-so-you-tried-to-make-a-bomb.ece

That pretty well summed up how I felt, but there were a few details that didn’t make much sense. As for example, didn’t anyone ask him what this thing was? Cops are supposed to protect kids, and getting the device out of the building might be a good idea once the school authorities reported its existence. There was no reason to handcuff him, but we had that in Los Angeles 20 years ago: officers had discretion on handcuffing people, and got pummeled because they handcuffed more Blacks and Latinos than White, and the Department took the discretion away: now everybody gets handcuffed, even though the cops find it absurd in many cases. On the other hand, there are plenty of cases where it’s a wise precaution, so if it’s handcuff everyone or handcuff no one, it has to be everyone, absurdities or not. I suspect it’s that way in Texas, too. One of the joys of diversity.

Then the White House was quick to get in the act, almost as if they were prepared for it. The kid with his badly designed digital clock — it looks like a mess of parts with no order at all – is suddenly a genius, invited to the White House to show off his cool clock, offered internships and fellowships, invited to science fairs, and probably gets a free scholarship to Cal Tech. [Sunday: I’ve heard but not confirmed that he was offered an MIT scholarship.]

clip_image003

The Cool Clock

I won’t be surprised if there comes a big lawsuit now. We haven’t heard the last of this, and I don’t think we really know the story at all. I do know I wouldn’t call that a cool clock, but then I am not the President. When I was a kid it was more mechanical devices than electronics, but we did a lot of things with Kettering ignition and carburetors. My first breadboard circuits were a lot neater and less intimidating than this cool clock, and if the kid didn’t know this certainly looks more like a bomb, or a faux bomb, than a clock, he needs a more schooling. If he’d brought it to my class, I wouldn’t have called police, but I’d certainly have had it put outside my classroom; which means I’d have had to tell the school authorities, who would have had to call the cops. Would you let him on an airplane with it?  Would your kid take that to a class without any preparation? Before the cops arrived wouldn’t you be saying it’s a clock and here’s how it works, and name all the parts and what they do?  It doesn’t look like a cool clock to me, it looks like a mess of electronic parts.

Never ascribe to malice and all that, but I wonder if someone didn’t put this Moslem kid named Mohammed up to this. It was, after all, on 9/11.  Security would be on alert. So he chooses 9/11 to bring something that looks like  a fake bomb to school?

bubbles

Pens and clocks

If you’re using a large pen because it’s easier to grip, my wife, who has MS, has a lot of success with these “team logo” pens, and they’re not horribly expensive.
http://www.amazon.com/Minnesota-Vikings-Team-Soft-Grip-Ballpoint/dp/B001K5RRI2
By the way, on that “clock kid” controversy, this guy has figured out that he didn’t build the clock, but just disassembled an old Radio Shack clock and stuffed it into a pencil case. Why? Good question.
http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/2015/09/17/reverse-engineering-ahmed-mohameds-clock-and-ourselves/
For the record, last time I tried to pull up this last link, it didn’t come up.

Tom

Actually all my ball point pens that I like are twisters rather than clickers; maybe it’s the cartridges.  But I sure wish I has a source of springs. But those pens are clickers.

That link worked for me, but it took a long time to come up. This chap deduces that Mohammed didn’t invent this cool clock, he bought a commercial electronic alarm clock, took it apart, and badly reassembled into a closed pencil case.  He is shocked that the kid would be arrested, but this looks even more like a put up job.  I wonder who put him up to it? And why a pencil case held closed with string? A box held closed with string?

I find the entire text in the link worth paying attention to, and I am afraid I have a more suspicious mind than Anthony does.

It took 8 minutes to post this, which is fast for Time Warner at 4PM.

[Sunday: it is now clear that Mohammed invented nothing: he bought a Micronta, a Radio Shack subsidiary. Catalog number 63 756
, disassembled it, and rebuilt it in a pencil box. It looks very like a conventional YV bomb, which, as we all know, always has a big red screen with numbers on it so the tension can rise.]

 

Read more: http://therightscoop.com/weve-been-had-ahmed-didnt-even-make-that-clock/#ixzz3mJl21k6X

Read more: http://therightscoop.com/weve-been-had-ahmed-didnt-even-make-that-clock/#ixzz3mJl21k6X

bubbles

Of clocks, boys and bombs –

There may be much more to this story than the media are interested in telling.

http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/2015/09/17/reverse-engineering-ahmed-mohameds-clock-and-ourselves/

Also, odd family history:

http://www.okayafrica.com/news/istandwithahmed-mohamed-elhassan-mohamed-sudanese-father-backstory/

Richard White

Austin, Texas

Curiouser and curiouser; the plot thickens.  You could float rocks in it.

bubbles

Ahmed’s clock.

It was very obvious from the disgustingly fawning nature of the initial press stories that this was a planned propaganda stunt. In the first article which appeared on the topic, in the Dallas Daily News (?), it was mentioned that the father was a perennial presidential candidate in Sudan.

It was clear that the boy had been coached to give uncooperative, passive-aggressive responses to the school administration and the police, staying just this side of the line of something actionable, in order to provoke as heavy-handed a response as possible.

I wouldn’t be surprised if one or more White House staffers had been forewarned to expect a ‘racism’ event in Texas, so that they could be primed to invite the boy and his family to the White House, if things went as expected. Ditto for Caltech.

—————————————

Roland Dobbins

And sloppily  done, looking like an electronic mess, possibly a bomb, and brought to school on 9/11.  I must say I am tempted to ascribe that to, if not malice, then a twisted sense of humor of the sort that causes people to carry packages labeled “bomb”; but I suspect it was a put up job, media friends alerted, President ready to Tweet at the “racist” response from Texas. And now his father gets to go to the White House.

bubbles

bubbles

bubbles

Learning more about using Word, but it’s hard, at least for me. Microsoft puts in all the tools and option, then carefully hides them where you can’t find them. Today I got

AutoComplete

I found this link
http://word.tips.net/T001620_Changing_AutoComplete_Words.html
Hope it helps.

Marc Wiener

But, alas, it invites me to “Choose AutoText from the Insert menu” and goes to explain what to do; but of course there is no AutoText in the Insert tab. Perhaps there once was, but it sure isn’t there now.

I had previously received from Mr. Checkley:

Word Options
Dear Dr Pournelle,
If you Select File, and then Options, you can (I hope) fix your autocomplete issues. The Proofing option has an AutoCorrect Options button, as well as a bunch of other options you probably want to check.
Inside the autocorrect panel there is an Actions section, which maybe has something to do with your date formatting (or maybe that is a 2013 option).
The Advanced option also has an Editing section, which has an AutoComplete setting too.
I apologize if you already knew all this (I’m never sure whether if I’m trying to teach you to suck eggs, as your PC experience is several years more extensive than mine).
Best Regards,
Dave Checkley

I see autocorrect but not autocomplete, I answered, rather testily I am afraid.

Word Options

Dear Dr Pournelle,

I have attached a document with details of how I was able to manage autocomplete. I have done a document because Google messed up my attempts to include pictures 🙁

I hope this helps…

Best Regards,

Dave Checkley

Using Autocomplete

I ran a search in Word Help. I first selected the online help from the bottom tag)

clip_image005

clip_image007

clip_image009

Then I did a search for autocomplete, and got these four entries:

clip_image011

The first and third ones are relevant. Here’s how to add autocomplete text (they call it Autotext):

Create a new AutoText entry

In Word 2010, AutoText entries are stored as building blocks. To create a new entry, use the Create New Building Block dialog box.

1. In your Word document, select the text that you want to add to your gallery of AutoText entries.

2. On the Insert tab, in the Text group, click Quick Parts, point to AutoText, and then click Save Selection to AutoText Gallery.

3. Fill out the information in the Create New Building Block dialog box:

o Name    Type a unique name for the AutoText building block.

o Gallery    Select the AutoText gallery.

o Category    Select the General category, or create a new category.

o Description    Type a description of the building block.

o Save in    Click the name of the template in the drop-down list. For example, click Normal.

A template must be open to be displayed in the drop-down list of template names.

o Options    Choose one of the following:

§ Select Insert content in its own page to place the building block on a separate page with page breaks before and after the building block.

§ Select Insert content in its own paragraph to make the content into its own paragraph, even if the user’s cursor is in the middle of a paragraph.

§ Select Insert content only for all other content.

There are also instructions on how to import autocomplete definitions from Word 2003.

The Word Options link has this in it:

Show AutoComplete suggestions    Select this option to see complete AutoText entries when you type the first four characters of the entry. You can press ENTER to add the full AutoText entry to your document, or you can continue to type the text you want. If you don’t want to see the AutoText suggestions, clear this check box.

I tried creating an AutoText entry using the method described – it worked just fine. I was also able to delete it, by selecting the Building Blocks Organizer.

I do thank Mr. Checkley. I am still experimenting with this. I find when I went to “Quick Parts” – what an intuitive name! – in the Insert Tab I get the opportunity to change j to Jerryp if I do save; but since I never told it to do that, and can’t think of any good reason why I should, perhaps I should leave it alone.  Things are working here on my Windows 7 machine with whatever version of Office I am using. It used to be that help/about would tell you, but if you use Word, try F1 and search for Version. It starts you on a procedure that’s a hell of a lot more complicated, and when you do File / Info it still doesn’t tell you the version. I give up for now, but Microsoft need to talk to people who USE their stuff. When Chris Peters ran Word it worked; since the new teams have added new features beyond measure, but their usefulness to USERDS seems to be going down, down, down. And just when CPU’s got faster, and memory and disk space got cheaper, Microsoft decided to eliminate redundancy and make everything have only one way to do anything. Microsoft’s real danger is that is becoming a bureaucracy that has forgotten its purpose, and Iron Law is at work.

bubbles

I have back here Office 365 with whatever version of Word that means; just finding that out is hard work.  The sadists at Microsoft  have fun telling us that you have to know what version of Word you are using to find out what version you are using.

There is a different procedure for each version.  Do any of the Microsoft fiefdoms talk to each other?  Is there any management at all now?  I guess they think they have a monopoly, and they can do as they will with their customers. Open Office was sort of on  its last legs, but I foresee a revival.  Something like Office 2007, maintained particularly for security threats, would be good enough; moat of the new Word features aren’t of much use to anyone I know. Script writers, journalists, law offices. engineering firms  — would it not be wonderful to have a word processor that you don’t have to relearn every couple of years at the whims of the publishers?  One that was worldwide standard so if you changed jobs you could use it at the new job, and once you were good at it you didn’t have all that knowledge go away? I’d pay $100 a year for that.  Forever.  Preferably not to Microsoft, which no longer cares about its users.  You can’t even be sure what version you are using without a lot of work! Do F1 and search on Version; open the What version am I using? answer. Be amazed when they do not answer the question.

bubbles

bubbles

bubbles

bubbles

bubbles

Freedom is not free. Free men are not equal. Equal men are not free.

bubbles

clip_image013

bubbles

Mad As Hell; Housekeeping; AutoComplete

View from Chaos Manor, Wednesday, September 17, 2015

Today at lunch my long suffering wife decided she had enough of the mess I live in. It was bad enough when it was upstairs, preventing us from having much in the way of parties since guests would want to see “where I work” and the Great Hall looks like a packrat’s nest; no, since the stroke I have been inhabiting the old downstairs office I bought this house for 50 years age. It was formerly a physicians office and treatment room (in the 1930’s), converted to a writer’s office, then reconverted into what amounts to an expanded hall, leading into Roberta’s office which we built on downstairs, with a staircase up to the Great Hall and the office suite I have been using (and accumulating junk in) since 1990. The chaos is coming downstairs! It is at her door!

Which means I have spent most of today getting the downstairs office into a semblance of order, all the junk off the stairs, and in general making the place look like it is inhabited by a successful writer, not a pigsty. I also went upstairs and threw away a pile of junk, set out more for Eric and Alex to decide what to do with, and filled a couple of bags with books for LASFS in case anyone wants them. If not, LASFS has a big disposal bin, and I’ll be glad to pay for the next trash collection. When Michelle picks me up to go to the LSAFS meeting tonight it will be out of the house forever.

So my working environment is much improved, but I didn’t get much done, and there’s no access to email up here in the Monk’s Cell.

clip_image001

Thanks to the people who wrote me on how to implement autocorrect in Word, but that’s not my problem. I think I have Autocorrect under control, at least for the versions of Word that I use. It’s AutoComplete that I can’t use. Microsoft gives me no help at all. Looking through the web I found

Using AutoComplete Tips

by Allen Wyatt (last updated September 8, 2015)

http://word.tips.net/T001750_Using_AutoComplete_Tips.html

who tells me

Word includes a nifty little feature called AutoComplete. This feature uses what Microsoft calls AutoComplete tips. These are used when you are typing AutoText phrases or even the names of months. As you type, Word will bring up a little yellow box above the incomplete word. If you then press F3 or the Tab key, Word automatically finishes the phrase. You may have noticed this if you ever typed in the name of a month, such as January.

To enable or disable the AutoComplete tips feature, follow these steps:

  1. Select AutoCorrect Options from the Tools menu. Word displays the AutoCorrect dialog box.
  2. Click your mouse on the AutoText tab. (See Figure 1.)

clip_image003

Figure 1. The AutoText tab of the AutoCorrect dialog box.

  1. Depending on your version of Word, select either the Show AutoComplete Tip for AutoText and Dates option or the Show AutoComplete Suggestions option to enable this feature, or deselect the option if you no longer want it.
  2. Click on OK.

WordTips is your source for cost-effective Microsoft Word training. (Microsoft Word is the most popular word processing software in the world.) This tip (1750) applies to Microsoft Word 97, 2000, 2002, and 2003.

There’s only one problem. I’m using Word 2010, and there are no tools to be found anywhere in there or any version I have. Microsoft has improved things to unusability. The nifty feature is still in it – it works on Alien Artifact – but I can’t figure out how to turn it on on the ThinkPad up here. I’ll keep looking, but Microsoft Help doesn’t want to tell me; I’m not clever enough to ask with the right terms. You have to think like a Microsoft product manager, and I fear I can’t do that.

Later (2325):  see below. The problem may – may – be solved but I won’t know until tomorrow.

clip_image001[1]

The debates last night showed that there are a lot of voters, Republican, Independent, and Democrat, who are mad as hell and aren’t going to take it any more. Despite CNN’s predictable actions, they didn’t destroy Trump, and notice that Dr. Carson, who has even less experience than Trump, is doing well in the polls. So is Carly Fiorina.

The Wall Street Journal doesn’t really understand this:

The Joy of Madness

Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders and the mad-as-hell American electorate.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-joy-of-madness-1442441068

By

Daniel Henninger

Sept. 16, 2015 6:04 p.m. ET

But they’re closer than most. It’s simple. Republicans have had both houses of Congress, and we still have all those horrid laws the Democrats rushed through in their last days in office, and no one has done anything. We have more Regulators than ever, and we can’t cut their budgets. We have raises for the Bunny Inspectors as they do jobs no one thinks are worth doing if we have to borrow the money to to it – most people think it not worth doing at the federal level at all. And a few of us look at the Constitution and try to see how keeping rabbits in our back yards is even under federal power by any possible construction. The states may have the power to forbid you to mistreat rabbits, but the Framers weren’t interested in granting that power to the Feds. Why would they be? And don’t tell me it’s because rabbit keeping is a modern practice unknown to John Adams.

Anyway, it’s time for dinner, and LASFS after that. And I have work to do on the Heorot novel with Niven and Barnes. As Larry recently observed, it works: our problems are beginning to solve each other without any new assumptions. Note that I wrote this with the new keyboard in the Monk’s Cell. Progress. Alas it’s still two finger staring at the keyboard, but I’m getting faster and faster with fewer errors per sentence.

Alas, things are still not working right upstairs: I can see my site, but I can’t post to it.  I’m downstairs now and with luck it will work from here. But I wrote all that upstairs.

clip_image001[2]

 

Back from LASFS and now in the back bedroom.  Three places.

 

clip_image001[3]

‘There is value, he said, in “keeping our options open for such a situation.”’

<https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/tech-trade-agencies-push-to-disavow-law-requiring-decryption-of-phones/2015/09/16/1fca5f72-5adf-11e5-b38e-06883aacba64_story.html>

—————————————

Roland Dobbins

 

clip_image001[4]

Word 2010 AutoComplete

Jerry

To turn on / off Auto Complete in Word 2010 – there’s a tickbox at

Menu: File / Options / Advanced / Show AutoComplete suggestions

Best Regards

Paul Hayward, Auckland, New Zealand

Yes, now that I know where to look it’s in there; now to get upstairs (tomorrow) and see if it’s in the same place in the version I have up there. On Alien Artifact it usually works, but every now and then it gets lost after a paste from mail; maybe this will work to turn it on again.  Thanks!!

 

 

clip_image001[5]

clip_image001[6]

Surface trouble

Dear Jerry:

I’m so glad your recovery from the stroke continues a pace! The problems with the Surface would seem to make you a prime candidate for the new iPad Pro… Something new to write about at the least, and it looks like fine product for your purpose. I love my Air but wouldn’t want to write anything much longer than this on it.

All the best,

Tim

I intend to get an iPad pro, but I have to say I am rooting for the Surface Pro and some enlightenment of the Microsoft user interface team.  The Surface seems able to do a lot, but learning how to induce the machine to do it is hard…

clip_image005

Freedom is not free. Free men are not equal. Equal men are not free.

clip_image005[1]

clip_image007

clip_image005[2]