Schools, customs, aether, unobtainium, and asteroid mines. And more.

Mail 721 Tuesday, April 24, 2012

clip_image002

Subject: My Grandson is serving detention today….

Jerry,

My Grandson is serving detention after school today for disrupting his class by making a poster and showing it to a girl he liked during a lecture. I’m trying going to have to try to remain stern with him when he returns home, but it’s going to be hard. He drew a picture of a ‘thumbs up’ on a sheet of paper, then printed in big block letters on the paper “Like Me… I’m a Facebook status!” (I included a PDF of it for you).

I had to tell you about it, because it’s pretty clear that Facebook is not only mainstream in the culture, but when he compared himself to a Facebook status, AND did it on paper….. it’s just pervasive.

 

 

clip_image002[1]

(MY apologies: what was easy under FrontPage has become nightmarishly complex with LiveWriter and ridiculous when using Word and LiveWriter. They keep improving things to the point of insanity. Anyway, there is the expansion of the pdf).

 

When Niven and I were doing Mote we were trying to describe a world in which people had pocket computers and used them routinely, but we did not think of stories like this. Signs of the times indeed.

clip_image002[1]

Journal pricing

http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k77982&tabgroupid=icb.tabgroup14344

Major Periodical Subscriptions Cannot Be Sustained

Harvard complaining about journal pricing.

Chris C

When CD ROM came out I pointed out that journal costs could quickly become trivial; but in fact they got more expensive. It is of course the Iron Law at work. And the government will subsidize those who “need” those journals, so the prices will continue to rise.

clip_image002[2]

Supernovae and Life

Dr. Pournelle —

Fascinating possibility!

Did exploding stars help life on Earth to thrive?

http://www.ras.org.uk/news-and-press/219-news-2012/2117-did-exploding-stars-help-life-on-earth-to-thrive

"Research by a Danish physicist suggests that the explosion of massive stars – supernovae – near the Solar System has strongly influenced the development of life. Prof. Henrik Svensmark of the Technical University of Denmark (DTU) sets out his novel work in a paper in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society."

"The director of DTU Space, Prof. Eigil Friis-Christensen, comments: ‘When this enquiry into effects of cosmic rays from supernova remnants began 16 years ago, we never imagined that it would lead us so deep into time, or into so many aspects of the Earth’s history. The connection to evolution is a culmination of this work.’ "

(Perhaps the stars have more to do with our lives than we thought.)

Pieter

Well, it may well be that cosmic rays have a lot to do with the temperature of the Earth; although the Warmer Believers do not seem to accept that. Or perhaps Poul Anderson’s Brain Wave was prophetic?

clip_image002[3]

: Debtors Prisons?

This is horrible; a woman went to jail for $208 medical bill that she did not owe and was told she did not have to pay:

<.>

Under the law, debtors aren’t arrested for nonpayment, but rather for failing to respond to court hearings, pay legal fines, or otherwise showing "contempt of court" in connection with a creditor lawsuit. That loophole has lawmakers in the Illinois House of Representatives concerned enough to pass a bill in March that would make it illegal to send residents of the state to jail if they can’t pay a debt. The measure awaits action in the senate.

"Creditors have been manipulating the court system to extract money from the unemployed, veterans, even seniors who rely solely on their benefits to get by each month," Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan said last month in a statement voicing support for the legislation. "Too many people have been thrown in jail simply because they’re too poor to pay their debts. We cannot allow these illegal abuses to continue."

</>

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/jailed-for–280–the-return-of-debtors–prisons.html

Laws are so many and so complex who even has time to read them all?  Lawyers all specialize in areas of law because so many laws exist that they can’t even be expected to know them all.  This is a joke!

—–

Most Respectfully,

Joshua Jordan, KSC

Percussa Resurgo

The stones are hard in debtor’s yard…

Your point about the multiplication of the laws is correct. It is now estimated that most middle class adults commit three Federal felonies a day, but few are aware of them. When the law is that complex it is not law at all; it merely puts everyone’s liberty at the discretion of the authorities. In his impeachment of Warren Hastings over Hastings’ activities in governing India, Edmund Burke said “Mr. Hastings pleads that he had discretionary power, and he used it. I put it to your Lordships that he had not discretionary power, and indeed your Lordships have not descretionary power to give.” Burke’s point was that discretionary power was the antithesis of the rule of law, and rule of law was the constitution of England. He was sympathetic with the American cause for similar reasons.

The Framers were very much aware of this. But those who will not learn history are doomed to repeat it…

clip_image002[4]

And now a short break:

QM_is_actually_a_hardware_problem.png

Jerry

Abstruse Goose is similar to xkcd. Here we learn that QM is actually a hardware problem:

http://abstrusegoose.com/strips/QM_is_actually_a_hardware_problem.png

Ed

clip_image002[5]

Subject: Pentagon explains why hypersonic, Mach 20 drone failed

http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/04/23/pentagon-explains-why-hypersonic-mach-20-drone-failed/

Tracy

Subject: Skin-peeling doomed Hypersonic glider

http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/04/23/skin-peeling-speeds-doomed-hypersonic-glider-u-s-says/?hpt=hp_t3

Tracy

And earlier Roland wrote

Unobtanium still unobtainable – it only cost us taxpayers $320,000.000.00 to verify that seemingly self-evident notion.

<http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-darpa-hypersonic-missile-20120420,0,4564567.story>

Spending that money on bunny inspectors makes more sense, IMHO.

Roland Dobbins

Which sums it up nicely. We have known since the NASP experiments that you do not want to be at hypersonic velocities in the atmosphere any longer than you have to be, which is why the Ramjet/Rocket hybrid route to orbit, which seems to attractive in theory, doesn’t work; which, to go a step farther, is why the kitchen cabinet group I chaired proposed SSX, See

Farewell to Space-Faring View 682 20110705-2

And

THE SSX CONCEPT

clip_image002[6]

We have a lot of mail on this:

Excellent Space News

WOW, this is good!  James Cameron is really starting to impress me as a guy who has his priorities straight; both he and I are explorers and, if I had his money, I would be doing many of the same things he is doing e.g. going to the bottom of the sea and, now, venturing into space!  I’d also get a ride on one of those new Virgin Atlantic volcano rigs that can go into an active volcano — I sent you an email with links to that new company and their vehicles weeks or months ago.  

<.>

Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt and billionaire co-founder Larry Page have teamed up with "Avatar" director James Cameron and other investors to back an ambitious space exploration and natural resources venture, details of which will be unveiled next week.

The fledgling company, called Planetary Resources, will be unveiled at a Tuesday news conference at the Museum of Flight in Seattle, according to a press release issued this week.

</>

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/google-execs-director-cameron-space-venture-005212432–sector.html

—–

Most Respectfully,

Joshua Jordan, KSC

Percussa Resurgo

Asteroid Mining?

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303513404577356190967904210.html

Ian Perry

Subj: Google+Cameron=Asteroid Mines!!!!!

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/google-execs-director-cameron-space-venture-005212432–sector.html

Jim

I will comment at greater length when I know more. A Step Farther Out has a a lot about asteroid resources, and my EXILE TO GLORY novel is set in a future about 2025 when we have asteroid mines and some spacefaring civilization travel.

clip_image002[7]

Aether

Jerry

The Michelson-Morley Experiment always struck me as very much like the Objection of the Headwinds, advanced by Aristotle, Ptolemy, and others against the rotation of the Earth.

The ancients were well aware that if you stood in a speeding chariot, you would experience a headwind. If the Earth moved toward the east diurnally, the speed would be much greater than that of a chariot and the headwind that much stronger. Nicholas Oresme, in the 14th century, expressed the objection this way:

If the earth is so moved, it makes a complete turn in a single natural day. Therefore, we and the trees and houses are moved toward the east very swiftly, and so it should seem that the air and wind blow continuously and strongly from the east, [much] as it does against a quarrel shot, [only] much more strongly. But the contrary appears by experience.

To which he gave the answer:

To the second experience, according to this opinion, the response is: Not only is the earth so moved [diurnally], but with it water and the air, as was said, in such a way that the water and lower air are moved differently than they are by winds and other causes. It is like this situation: If air were enclosed in a moving ship, it would seem to the person situated in this air that it was not moved.

With no concept yet of inertia, force, et al., he could not explain why the air and oceans (and people) should share Earth’s motion. Indeed, it was not until Gugliemini dropped balls from the tower of Bologna in the 1790s and measured the Coriolis effect that the rotation of the Earth was empirically established. It seemed to me that the Michelson-Morley experiment was the old Aristotelian Objection of the Headwinds.

Why they expected an aether wind at all, I have no idea. According to Aristotle, the aether is by definition an invisible, incorruptible body, with little in common with ordinary matter. It cannot be acted upon by ordinary matter; and acts on ordinary matter (and our senses) only indirectly. The nature of aether is knowable by argument, not by experience. (Which is sounding a bit like dark matter or the quantum vacuum, now that I think on’t.) MM may have destroyed the modern "Lorenzian ether," but it never laid a glove on the Aristotelian aether.

MikeF

I have been doing considerable reading on special relativity and I am now convinced that it is wrong. By wrong I mean that every experiment it explains can be explained by something a great deal simpler, and by Occam’s Razor we have no need of special relativity. And spectroscopic binaries seem to impose a mountainous difficulty for special relativity, requiring a very great deal of complex explanation, while a much simpler theory – Beckmann’s notion of “aether” as a local gravitational field – gives the same result with algebra.

Of course I am hardly the person to proclaim the non-necessity of special relativity; but I do wonder if we need it.

clip_image002[8]

Turing’s rapid Nazi Enigma code-breaking secret revealed

Original URL: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/04/23/turing_papers_released/

Turing’s rapid Nazi Enigma code-breaking secret revealed

Maths homework kept in GCHQ vault for 70 years

By Anna Leach <http://forms.theregister.co.uk/mail_author/?story_url=/2012/04/23/turing_papers_released/>

Posted in Government <http://www.theregister.co.uk/public_sector/government/> , 23rd April 2012 07:26 GMT <http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/04/23/>

Blighty’s communications eavesdropping nerve centre GCHQ has issued two papers written by superboffin Alan Turing on the maths behind code-breaking.

The documents, held in secret for 70 years, laid the foundations for the quick and efficient decryption of Nazi Enigma-scrambled messages – a breakthrough that lopped about two years off the duration of the Second World War.

The papers were donated on Friday to The National Archive <http://nationalarchives.gov.uk/default.htm> [1] in Kew, Surrey, where they will be available to view on request. An archives spokesperson said demand to see Turing’s work is high, but there is no plan to put it online.

The GCHQ mathematician who handed over the documents, named only as Richard, told the BBC <http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-17771962> [2] that the agency had now "squeezed the juice" out of the two papers and was "happy for them to be released into the public domain". The move coincides with the 100th anniversary of Turing’s birth on 23 June this year.

The two typewritten papers feature Turing’s hand-scribbled notes, and are titled On Statistics of Repetitions and The Applications of Probability to Cryptography.

Excerpt from Turing paper, credit: National Archive scan <http://regmedia.co.uk/2012/04/20/turing_paper_2.jpg>

Turing the tables on Nazi encryption – click for the full page [3]

The statistics paper describes how examining repeated characters in two encrypted messages can prove that both passages use the same encipherment key. The cryptography essay is longer and applies rigorous probability analysis to code-breaking methods and techniques.

The mathematical workings are given a little historical piquancy when Turing uses life expectancy to examine conditional probability, taking Hitler – then aged 52 – as an example. It dates the paper to between April 1941 and April 1942.

According to GCHQ’s Richard, the papers used "mathematical analysis to try and determine the more likely settings [for the crypto key] so that they can be tried as quickly as possible".

The agency added that the message decryption rate achieved by wartime code-breakers at Bletchley Park was "almost certainly enabled by the techniques in this paper". More details on Turing’s newly revealed work can be found here <http://www.gchq.gov.uk/Press/Pages/turing-papers-released.aspx>

A gripping story.

clip_image002[9]

Equality

"that all men are created equal": the Great Lie in the US Declaration of Independence. The Great Lie, because it is patently and obviously untrue.

Some people simply are superior to others. Was the opinion of Albert Einstein (who, I believe, became a US citizen) of equal value to Joe Epsilon Minus?

Ian Campbell

But of course it is untrue and those who signed the document knew that at least as well as you do. It was to be the agreed axiom: not a truth but an agreed axiom.

That was my point.

The problem comes when you assume that an axiom is actually to be regarded as true.

Jerry Pournelle

Chaos Manor

Quite. I suspect that at least some of the Founders would like to have added "in the eyes of God" in the appropriate place, which would have made the matter clear. However, although my knowledge of American constitutional history is limited (and why shouldn’t it be – I’m British?) I do believe that at least some of them were atheist or at least Deist rather than formally religious, and that may be the reason why that phrase was not included.

A larger point is that any form of democratic rule only works well when the voters understand the issues and are prepared to take the time to think about them. For far too many people in the USA, and also in the UK to be fair, one or both of those conditions do not apply.

Someone truly cynical might think that the parlous state of the educational system in both of our countries is deliberately designed to keep it that way.

Regards

Ian Campbell

clip_image002[10]

You turned me on to Kipling, and for that I thank you. Now I read a Kipling poem or two each day. Today’s read:

 

A Servant When He Reigneth

 

Three things make earth unquiet

And four she cannot brook

The godly Agur counted them

And put them in a book —

Those Four Tremendous Curses

With which mankind is cursed;

But a Servant when He Reigneth

Old Agur entered first.

An Handmaid that is Mistress

We need not call upon.

A Fool when he is full of Meat

Will fall asleep anon.

An Odious Woman Married

May bear a babe and mend;

But a Servant when He Reigneth

Is Confusion to the end.

His feet are swift to tumult,

His hands are slow to toil,

His ears are deaf to reason,

His lips are loud in broil.

He knows no use for power

Except to show his might.

He gives no heed to judgment

Unless it prove him right.

Because he served a master

Before his Kingship came,

And hid in all disaster

Behind his master’s name,

So, when his Folly opens

The unnecessary hells,

A Servant when He Reigneth

Throws the blame on some one else.

His vows are lightly spoken,

His faith is hard to bind,

His trust is easy boken,

He fears his fellow-kind.

The nearest mob will move him

To break the pledge he gave —

Oh, a Servant when he Reigneth

Is more than ever slave!

Live long and prosper

h lynn keith

clip_image002[11]

California Nightmarin’

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304444604577340531861056966.html?mod=djemEditorialPage_h

"Its [personal] income tax is steeply progressive. Millionaires pay a top rate of 10.3%, the third-highest in the country. But middle-class workers—those who earn more than $48,000—pay a top rate of 9.3%, which is higher than what millionaires pay in 47 states."

Charles Brumbelow=

Alas

clip_image005

A message from the Believers to the Deniers

‘Let’s start keeping track of them now, and when the famines come, let’s make them pay. Let’s let their houses burn.’

<http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevezwick/2012/04/19/a-tennessee-firemans-solution-to-climate-change/>

Forbes Magazine, ladies and gentlemen.

Roland Dobbins

 

Jerry,

When the scientists try to stifle contrary views, that might fall under "business as usual" even though it’s card to call it science. But when thy try to hide their own contrary data and analysis, or manipulate (or fabricate) data to achieve the desired results (e.g. the "hockey stick"), it is hard to avoid concluding that they are perpetrating a hoax.

I have no doubt that Gore is motivated by the billions a year that his companies would make from carbon credit trading rather than by any sense that he’s saving the planet.

Anon

Anonymity is advisable…

clip_image002[12]

First contact based on space probe

In Mail 721 Tuesday, April 17, 2012 B asked about a novel where first contact followed alien discovery of a terrestrial space probe. It isn’t a novel, but the Larry Niven short story Like Banquo’s Ghost probably qualifies.

Doug

Douglas Stuart

Written in 1968. Niven and I were present when the Plaque idea for Pioneer was implemented.

clip_image002[13]

A Sad Statemtent on Space

I hope this is just bitter cynicism and not indicative of our future.  If so, this is sad, and — yes — if this is the case, my son will be studying Russian and Chinese.  

<.>

When asked for advice Tuesday by a WUSA9 reporter, former Discovery astronaut Dr. Anna Fisher told a boy watching the shuttle, “Study Russian.”

</>

http://freebeacon.com/obama-ruins-kids-day/

This is so sad.  We wasted our money on socialist largess and now we might be stuck here with these creeps.  I wonder how hard it will be to stow away on a rocket off this rock?  But, we’ll see how things work when my generation takes the helm.  Maybe we can pull this one out of the fire and let these socialist creeps fall by the wayside where they belong.  

—–

Most Respectfully,

Joshua Jordan, KSC

.Of course it might be bad advice. Studying Chinese might be more effective.

clip_image002[14]

Video: ‘If I Wanted America to Fail’

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/04/22/video-if-i-wanted-america-to-fail/

This is a powerful video with an unrelenting tempo and one line at the end, "If I wanted America to fail I…I suppose I wouldn’t change a thing."

Just watch it. Think about it. Recommend it to your friends. And be sure to give it a thumbs up.

If we fail, the richest among us won’t fail. They’ll move to where failure is not the mode of the day. The rest of us will be stuck here in an ever worsening condition. All we have to do to ensure this is . . . . . nothing, not a single damn thing.

{^_^}

clip_image002[15]

clip_image002[17]

clip_image007

clip_image002[18]

Higher Education whirlwind. And check your DNS virus

View 721 Tuesday, April 24, 2012

clip_image002

The President has discovered that colleges are expensive and people are graduating with crippling debt, and this is a hell of a way to start life. It’s not fair and unless Congress intervenes the interest rates are going up, and –

Of course Obama took over all college loans and ended the college loan business; it is now a Federal monopoly.

But the real question is, why does all this cost so much? My wife and I both worked our way through college, and all four of our boys got through without lifetime debts. In those days college tuition was high for prestige private colleges, but most people could afford state college or even state university tuition; the tough part was making a living. In my case the Korean GI Bill paid my tuition and left a little over for rent, but eating wasn’t included: I ate through the courtesy of Reich’s Café, two blocks from the campus of the State University of Iowa. Reich’s had what were known as “board jobs”, meaning that you worked an hour as a waiter and in return you got one meal off the regular menu with a few exceptions, except that on certain holidays you could order anything you wanted. You also got to keep your tips, typically in 1953 about forty cents in an hour. Reich’s had been doing this for generations; I found out about it before I decided to go to Iowa, and I got my board job before school opened. I continued at Reich’s until I got a position as an undergraduate assistant.

The federal government won’t allow board jobs now. It exploits the workers. Now waiters have to be paid minimum wage and get all sorts of benefits.

Even so, it’s not the rising cost of living that has made bondsmen of the graduating aspirants to the middle class. It’s still possible to live several to an apartment and eat Purina Monkey Chow (I can tell you from experience that it works: it’s wholesome, has all the vitamins and minerals and such that primate mammals need, and has the added benefit that you can eat all you want of it and you won’t get fat provided of course that you don’t eat anything else. If Purina Monkey Chow is hard to find – it wasn’t in most college towns in my day – you can manage on whatever brand of dog good you fancy but you may want to invest in a good one-a-day vitamin/mineral supplement; dogs have adapted to eat what humans eat, but they’re still no primates. And of course there are more appetizing low cost diets, ramen is cheap, mac and cheese with leeks is pretty good; the point is that the cost of eking out a living for four years isn’t what puts you in debt for life.

Tuition costs are going up. Even as we discover that for about half the college grads the education is useless. See:

 ‘1 in 2 new college grads jobless or underemployed’

What everyone seems to overlook is that the cost of college tuition will always rise to exceed the amount of money seeking tuition. The more money the government puts into the market, the higher the price of college, and it will trickle down from Harvard to the meanest community college. When more money chases goods, the price of the goods goes up; and if government then acts to increase the money supply, the price will rise without limit. Evan as I write this, the faculty of the California State Universities is voting to authorize a strike because they have not had raises in four years, poor things. The California State Universities were in the master plan to be the State Colleges, undergraduate institutions kept cheap and open essentially to everyone qualified to be in a a State College. They were to incorporate the State Teachers Colleges, and be the primary undergraduate education system; outstanding students would be accepted at or allow to transfer to the State University system, which would have a monopoly on graduate education.

The State College took over the State Teachers Colleges and next thing you know they needed to offer graduate degrees in education (although there is no evidence that those who have graduate degrees in education are any better at teaching, and in fact California State Colleges for twenty years taught such an ineffective system of reading that the illiteracy rate in California soared; but that’s for another story. If you know anyone about to enter the California state public schools, go to www.readingtlc.com and get my wife’s reading program so the kid will learn to read even if the teacher is a Cal State grad.) Anyway, all the Cal States offer graduate degrees in everything, and most of them are not very useful; but so long as the money supply lasts the costs will continue to rise, the faculties will be paid and paid and overpaid and pensioned off at very high levels, and the dance will continue.

So now it is becoming manifest that not only is the public school system nearly worthless, but half the graduates of the higher education system are unemployable.

There are solutions to this, most of them drastic, and we know how to have good higher education institutions. But so long as we are willing to pay for it, we’ll continue to have what we get. Charlie Sheffield and I played with this decades ago in a book called HIGHER EDUCATION. Alas it is not yet a Kindle book (I’m working on it). But the decay of our institutions of higher education under the relentless attacks of the government shoveling in money and the Iron Law assuring that the money will be accepted and overspent continues. And the beat goes on. We sowed that wind a long time ago, so why are we astonished at what we reap now?

Niven and I will address this in our new novel, which is a story of how we fixed things. Obviously there is a bit of a fairy tale in such a story. But you’ll like it a lot. Meanwhile, make sure your kids can read. By read, I mean that by the end of second grade they can read any word in the English language including “big words” like Constantinople and Timbuktu but also polyethylbichloridetoluene. If they can’t read that word – slowly and with difficulty and of course without understanding because there ain’t no such thing – they can’t read. “Reading at grade level” means illiterate. Make sure you understand that if you have children or grandchildren ‘reading at grade level.’ Go to www.readingtlc.com for more information.

clip_image002[1]

Subject: Hundreds of thousands may lose Internet in July

http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/04/23/hundreds-thousands-may-lose-internet-in-july/

I believe setting this network up in response to users back in November was a good idea, but it’s time to shut it down. The FBI is doing absolutely correct in shutting it down now as users need to be responsible for their own machines.

If you aren’t running a high quality Antivirus, get Microsoft Security Essentials, it’s free, updates automatically and is relatively unobtrusive: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/products/security-essentials

I’d also recommend downloading, installing and running Malwarebytes on a regular basis, the free version works fine: http://www.malwarebytes.org/products/malwarebytes_free

Tracy Walters, CISSP

There’s a flurry of mainstream radio show discussion of the DNS Changer Trojan (the subject of the letter above), enough so that it’s probably worth while for readers to check your systems. Those with properly updated Windows systems don’t have anything to worry about. Those with Mac systems may or may not have a problem, but if you aren’t careful you almost certainly will install an annoyance. There are a number of tools that will check your Mac for the DNS Changer, and they’re free and reliable; but they come with a confusing offer for a Mac Cleaner program that if you’re not careful will get you to download it. It’s not malware. It’s just annoying. It will find a ton of things that it will try to persuade you to do – all you have to do is pay them for their cleaner, which, as it happens, isn’t part of the scanning package.

And it will keep trying to scan, and stopping the scan isn’t easy. Eventually you can delete this thing and find a less annoying program that will scan for DNS Changer. Be careful who you get it from. There are, of course, places you can go for a virus scanner that will actually install the virus for you.

If you stay with major sources you won’t get the virus, but if you are not careful — remember you don’t have to do a general scan to find out if you have the DNS Changer, which you probably don’t have anyway — you can set yourself up for major annoyances, particularly if you’re using a Mac. I suppose there are as many annoyance traps for Windows users, too, but most people with Windows are used to finding ways periodically to scan their systems just in case something snuck in, and the Windows Live Security Essentials takes care of this thing anyway. Windows users get their annoyances in daily doses from Windows. Mac users don’t have so many of those, but because they tend to take security for granted, they don’t know just what’s coming when they do try to look into it.

Anyway, it’s good for your peace of mind to check for the DNS Changer infection, which used to be nearly ubiquitous before the scanners and fixers and updates got its measure.

clip_image002[2]

I’m doing a column, and yes, it’s a bit late. But I’m getting there. We’ll cover the year, some trends, Alien Artifact my new computer with its really great Thermaltake case and power supplies, and I’ll review a bunch of books. And more.

clip_image003

I have a lot of mail, and I’ll try to get that up now.

clip_image002[8]

clip_image005

clip_image002[9]

Equality, Battlefield Earth, Diversity, Aether, Harrison Bergeron, and other matters

Mail 721 Saturday, April 21, 2012

clip_image002

Equality

"that all men are created equal": the Great Lie in the US Declaration of Independence. The Great Lie, because it is patently and obviously untrue.

Some people simply are superior to others. Was the opinion of Albert Einstein (who, I believe, became a US citizen) of equal value to Joe Epsilon Minus?

Ian Campbell

But of course. Do you really think that Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Franklin, were unaware that in the real world men are not equal, either in potential or in realization of their talents, or in moral worth? Do you believe an experienced soldier doesn’t know very well that his troopers are not equal? Yet we made that an axiom of the Republic.

An axiom. Which is to say, we agreed not to question that as a principle. All are equal before the law, as opposed to England where some could be tried only by their peers, or in Visigothic Spain where there were categories of citizenship, or in Rome where there were Patricians and Plebians, or – well, I needn’t belabor the point. For good or ill, we contracted to the notion that people are equal. But that works both ways, or should.

What we have done is take a self-evidently limited axiom and tried to stretch it beyond all limits, then pretend that everyone really and truly is equal, and there must be equality of outcome as well as of opportunity.

Now as a matter of theology, all men as seen by God may very well be of equal worth; and we wrote that into the Declaration also. We postulated that there is a morality external to our wishes, and we agreed to act as if we believe that to be true.

As to the value of citizens, that is a much different question. What does it mean, value? And to whom? In some cultures the legitimate children of some fathers are definitely worth more than their illegitimate children who are in turn worth more than the children legitimate or not of less favored fathers. That we rejected.

No, all are not equal, and some are more valuable to the Republic than others, and we have always had the good sense to act that way; but we have also had the good sense not to dig too deeply into what we mean by equality and worth.

When I was young I thought and said that I thought that the law should be colorblind. This wasn’t a popular view among the adults around me in legally segregated Memphis, and I was thought a hopeless left-winger (at a time when I had no understanding of what that meant). As I grew older I never changed that view, and now I am thought a hopeless right-winger, although I am not sure what that means either. I once told one of my pre-law students who had been admitted to UCLA Law School under a minorities program to go back and tell them to stuff it: I wouldn’t have recommended him if I didn’t think he deserved acceptance, not as a black man, but as a hard working student who applied himself and would do well in law school. I never expected him to be in the top half of his class, but then not everyone will be. But he deserved to be accepted on his merits, not on the merit of being black.

And that is what I mean by equality.

Aristotle teaches us that injustice consists of treating equal thing unequally, but also of treating unequal things equally. We need to be careful what we mean by “created equal”, and we certainly cannot separate created equal from a Creator; but we long ago agreed to that, as we agreed that just powers of government come from the consent of the governed.

clip_image002[1]

Diversity and the melting pot.

Jerry,

I believe that at one time before one could become a naturalised American it was necessary to have some grasp of the English language. Dropping this rule was very unwise. My job seeking Californian friend tells me that being bilingual in English and Spanish is now required by most employers. For a country to establish enclaves of people who do not speak the language of the country is very divisive.

As to Fred Reed on the black population, I expect that you are both correct. I surmise that the blacks that you meet are, pigmentation aside, no different from the whites that you meet. Fred spent a lot of time as a crime reporter riding in the police cars that patrolled the ghettos, and saw the worst side of the black population. Given inspired teaching some ghetto children can reach the middle classes but they, and the teaching that they need are in short supply. Read Fred’s cop columns if you are skeptical.

Then there is the great evil of positive discrimination. A black who has the talent and determination to rise in his profession will encounter quite reasonable doubts as to whether he rose because of his innate qualities or because, being short of the black quota, he was selected because he was the best black available.

John Edwards

RE: Diversity vs. the Melting Pot

Thank you thank you thank you! Why? For actually articulating the real problem that the Pollyanish left and ‘Derbyshire’ right refuse to concede: that the disintegration of the culture is the real problem, and not cognitive gaps, racism, etc.

As near as I can tell, blacks were doing just fine at assimilating into the middle class right up until LBJ and the Great Society basically blew that apart and set blacks (and America) back decades.

That this is very rarely mentioned is both galling and frustrating, and I thank you furiously for being one of the (very) few commentators actually pointing it out. If only you could get everyone else singing from the same hymnal, we might be able to have a sane, reasonable, discussion that we *need* to have.

Thanks again,

ECM

 

The evidence from the academies in New York and other places is that there are plenty of blacks willing and able to be assimilated into the Republic, and that this is desirable. The rejection of assimilation is a terrible tragedy. When the American culture is gone then e pluribus unum will be gone as well.

Excellent essay today.

It included this: " Yet there’s hope: there are the projects in Harlem, and Chicago, which insist on excellence in education, and which succeed, often startlingly well. You don’t see much about them in the media. Once in a while 60 Minutes will focus on such an institution, but mostly they don’t, and there’s a reason. They emphasize discipline, good grooming, politeness, and cultural assimilation along with rigorous education. And they work. They are turning out Americans who are black. And thus they are all but ignored by the liberal intellectuals."

I have seen reports on these projects and agree that they are conspicuous by their undeniable success, by general lack of widespread reporting on them in the media, and a visceral hatred shown them by the ‘education establishment’. On the other hand, the hundred odd years of empirical data that Fred refers to is still empirical data.

Unfortunately, I suspect that by demonstrating that dedicated, skilled instructors who insist on excellence and enforce classroom discipline can move the bell curve of black achievement one SD to the right, what is really demonstrated is that dedicated, skilled instructors who insist on excellence and enforce classroom discipline can take a population whose IQ bell curve peaks at 85 and instill in it what is considered to be an excellent education by our educational establishment. I also suspect, but with no supporting data other than the hundred years of data cited by Fred, that if caucasian students were ‘subjected’ to the same ‘enforce discipline and push the students to the limit’ educational environment, rather than being immersed in a culture of ‘no child left behind’ that their ‘results’ bell curve would move one SD to the right of the the black results bell curve. And if a group of Ashkenazic Jews were similarly subjected, their results bell curve would in turn peak approximately one SD to the right of the general caucasian peak. Just as a century of empirical data has consistently indicated.

Bob Ludwick

You miss the point. So what? The nation does not require that everyone be above average. It does require a certain minimum of acculturation. The academic results show that those willing to become Americans can do so. That may not be all of the young blacks. I wouldn’t know. I do know that it has been adequately demonstrated that significant numbers of young blacks respond to hard work and discipline despite some wide spread assumptions that this can’t happen.

We need as many Americans as we can get. We do not need diversity.

clip_image002[2]

The High Ground

Dear Jerry;

Last week this outcropped on Chaos Manor:

"Himalayan glaciers actually GAINING ice, space scans show:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/04/16/himalayan_karakoram_glaciers_gaining_ice/

An inconvenient truth?

Ed

Which is hardly astonishing since glacier formation is far more dependent on rainfall and moisture content than temperature. Actually, warmer climates ought to be wetter, shouldn’t they? Which would mean more snowfall and glaciers which should mean more reflectivity which should mean cooling which – but I am not a climate modeller. I would have thought that kind of loop would be built into the models, though."

Your comments are apposite, but having ranged several of the glaciers in question, especially the Raikot, I feel obliged to point out the obvious- With major peaks above 25,000 feet, the monsoon fed glaciers between Nanga Parbat , K2 and Kargil are so high as to defy vertical migration of the frost line – global warming is not about to thaw the Death Zone anytime soon.

Incidentally , the scariest bergschund tongue on Nanga Parbat has a bridge over it, and consists , in season, of a clanking down escalator made up of house sized rocks barely lubricated with ice. You <i> really<.I>don’t want to go down there!

Russell Seitz

Fellow of the Department of Physics

Harvard University

clip_image002[3]

Fabrication of a witness in the Zimmerman-Martin shooting.

Jerry;

There is some really good web sleuthing occurring on this case.

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2012/04/21/update-10-part-2-the-trayvon-martin-shooting-deedee-reveals-the-false-truths/#more-37932

I expect Zimmerman to be suing the Martin family lawyers under state and federal RICO statutes.

Jim Crawford

clip_image002[4]

IOM Report on Autism & Childhood Vaccination

http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Adverse-Effects-of-Vaccines-Evidence-and-Causality/Report-Brief.aspx?page=2=

Autism & Childhood Vaccines

Hi Jerry-

Fifteen years ago, when my children were in the vaccination cohort, I carefully reviewed the evidence regarding autism and exposure to childhood vaccines. At that time, there was rather convincing evidence that exposure to vaccines did not increase the risk of autism. Since that time, additional evidence has accumulated that there is no relationship between vaccine exposure and autism. I am unaware of any credible evidence to the contrary. If there is evidence that now shows that vaccine exposure has the effect of increasing autism risk, I’d be greatly interested in looking at it.

Best,

-Steve=

I do not believe it is a good idea to give 25 vaccinations all at once, as they used to do. There needs to be some sanity in this business.

clip_image003

I have a great deal of mail on this.

Gold Record on Pioneers

“It occurred to me I have never read any novels about a race that discovers one of our probes which exited the solar system, then did a search to find us based upon the gold record.

Do you know of any (and I mean good ones, not a hack novel).

I recall the First Star Treck Film, but that does not count…

B”

L Ron Hubbard’s book Battlefield Earth has the planet attacked based on the Gold Records of the Pioneers.

Whether or not it’s a hack novel is not for me to say.

David March

Many others have pointed this out. Hubbard wrote science fiction adventure (indeed adventure of every conceivable genre – he was incredibly prolific) and much of it remains quite readable. The reputation of Battlefield Earth was not enhanced by the motion picture, which had a director afraid of his star, and who allowed the star to overact as many actors will do if the director will let them; the result was the injection of farcical scenes in a dramatic movie, and that never works. I thought the novel a bit long, but it certainly moved. Hubbard was a story teller.

Gold from Voyager

" It occurred to me I have never read any novels about a race that discovers one of our probes which exited the solar system, then did a search to find us based upon the gold record."

Well, there’s Battlefield Earth. Although it turned out that the gold was what they wanted all along, and if we’d done it on titanium or steel then they wouldn’t have bothered.

Mike T. Powers

clip_image002[5]

» Climate Alarmist Calls For Burning Down Skeptics’ Homes Alex Jones’ Infowars: There’s a war on for your mind!

Jerry,

Fallen Angels should become required reading.

http://www.infowars.com/climate-alarmist-calls-for-burning-down-skeptics-homes/

Jim Crawford

I wouldn’t mind that.

clip_image002[6]

Pioneer anomaly solved?

<http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00003459/>

<http://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.2507v1.pdf>

Roland Dobbins

That may well be. I have always hoped that the Pioneer anomaly would provide us with an interesting test of special relativity. As they get farther and farther from the Sun the gravitational field gets thinner; under Beckmann’s theory the speed of light changes as the medium changes, and the medium is the dominant gravitational field through which the light ray travels.

Beckmann has tried to revive the notion of an aether: it consists of the gravitational field, and it’s in that field that light waves ‘wave’. As the medium changes the speed of light changes (as it does when it goes into water or a glass prism). The gravitational field of the Earth is entrained (moves with the Earth) so the Michaelson-Morley experiment would not be expected to find any proper motion of the Earth through the aether. But that’s another essay for another time.

clip_image003[1]

Harrison Bergeron-short film

I didn’t know if you were aware that someone had done an excellent short film adaptation on this story. You can watch it on youtube at the following link.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7mftzcZfJ0

Craig Pruett

I had never seen that. Thanks.

clip_image002[7]

Fred’s variation on HARRISON BERGERON

http://www.fredoneverything.net/LLA.shtml

This was posted last November but seems to fit.

Charles Brumbelow

clip_image002[8]

HARRISON BERGERON – A Secondary Story

(Re)read this story and picked up a secondary story line.

"It was then that Diana Moon Glampers, the Handicapper General, came into the studio with a double-barreled ten-gauge shotgun. She fired twice, and the Emperor and the Empress were dead before they hit the floor."

Notice that the HG showed up quickly, and efficiently murdered the two dancers, without any hint of having been handicapped down to average…demonstrating once again that government functionaries are not subject to their own laws, rules, and regulations, and that subjects are not provided with due process One can reasonably infer that murder charges would not be filed against the HG.

Today a drone strike would probably be used…

Charles Brumbelow

clip_image002[9]

Stand Your Ground law – part 2

Dear Jerry,

After Matthew wrote and quoted the statute, I did some research. The information I gave was based on the Diane Rehm Show, air date 3 April. The transcript can be found at http://thedianerehmshow.org/shows/2012-04-03/stand-your-ground-and-concealed-weapons-laws/transcript. The background on the reason for the law is given by John Velleco of Gun Owners of America :

MR. JOHN VELLECO

10:08:38

Well, Stand Your Ground laws were needed because people were being prosecuted for defending themselves with a firearm because of the principal of the duty to retreat, and people have — would have a duty to retreat in the face of attack and…

GJELTEN

10:08:57

Is that phrase duty to retreat actually written into law in many places?

VELLECO

10:09:02

Yes. That was written into several Supreme Court cases going back to the late 1800s. And it becomes a murky proposition when — did a person retreat enough? And people were being prosecuted and bankrupt defending themselves. Even if they were not convicted, they would end up being bankrupt by overzealous prosecutions and finding themselves victimized really twice, once by the criminal, once by the criminal justice system.

The statements on police limitations, by Elizabeth Megale of Barry University Law School, are as follows:

MEGALE

10:14:43

Prosecution begins with detention in Florida. Most other states don’t start prosecution with detention. But in the statute defining immunity from prosecution, we start the definition at detention, then custody, then arrest, which means someone cannot even be detained if there’s any evidence that they acted in self-defense. In the castle, again, you have this presumption of reasonable fear.

MEGALE

10:15:07

But even outside the castle, if there’s any evidence that shows that you had a reasonable fear, then you no longer have to establish that to a jury or even to a judge. The police are not entitled or allowed to arrest you until they can disprove this — that you were not in reasonable fear or — excuse me — until they can prove you were not in reasonable fear.

MEGALE

10:15:32

So that’s the problem with this — with the Trayvon Martin case, is that when the police arrived on scene, at least one version of the story is that Mr. Zimmerman had injuries consistent with his claims that he was acting in self-defense. And if that is the case and there was any evidence of that, the police are now in a position where they must disprove his claim of self-defense before they can even detain him.

So Matthew is, of course, correct, and I should have done more research before I wrote to you. Police were required to release Zimmerman, but not to cease investigating the incident. My apologies.

Regards,

Jim (still not related to Trayvon) Martin

clip_image002[10]

Terry Pratchett-This is just sad

In today’s Britain, even a Knight must hide his sword.

http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilderness-resources/blogs/sir-terry-pratchett-forges-a-sword-with-a-meteorite

Will there ever again be an England?

Cordially,

John

I guess there will never again be an England, and that is indeed sad.

clip_image002[11]

Dear Dr. Pournelle:

I just now came across this:

http://io9.com/5903345/is-james-camerons-next-big-venture-asteroid+mining

and thought it would interest you. I’ve been waiting for this to happen ever since I read your first stories about it. Cameron may be a flake but Diamandis and the others seem like serious guys.

Regards,

Tim Scott=

We can hope.

.

clip_image003[2]

Jerry,

This Henninger piece on Paul Ryan hits the nail straight on the head. I have been looking for someone to articulate my thoughts on this and it was a Pope from long ago.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304356604577337922580242292.html?KEYWORDS=paul+ryan

Ryan is on it…

rjw

Rod

clip_image002[12]

‘Instead, they identify local businesses, like bagel shops and delis, that are not in compliance with the law, and then aggressively recruit plaintiffs from advocacy groups for people with disabilities.’

<http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/17/nyregion/lawyers-find-obstacles-to-the-disabled-then-find-plaintiffs.html?&pagewanted=all>

Roland Dobbins

The Iron Law at work.

clip_image002[13]

clip_image002[14]

clip_image005

clip_image002[15]

Diversity vs. the Melting Pot

View 720 Friday, April 20, 2012

clip_image002

Many of you have called my attention to three comments by Fred Reed (Fred on Everything). They are all on the same topic although approaching it from different directions, but all starting with a the Zimmerman Martin affair. They are in order, and it won’t take long to read them all.

http://fredoneverything.net/Screwed.shtml

http://fredoneverything.net/Travon2.shtml

http://fredoneverything.net/Zimmerman.shtml

The third comment begins

The Coming Race War in America was published in 1996 by Carl Rowan, the black columnist and former ambassador to Finland. The title is not ironic. He foresaw a major racial explosion. The book of course was furiously ignored. It should not have been. It dealt with an apocalyptic vision that has lurked around the edges of American consciousness since before the Civil War. And still does. We just don’t talk about it.”

Fred writes in the tradition of the science fiction authors in stories characterized by Robert Heinlein as “Warning: If this goes on…” and of course one of his novellas, about what happens if Evangelicals like the Reverend Billy Sunday take political power, had that title. Fred isn’t writing about the dangers of evangelicals.

Fred is an old friend, and I often agree with him. I’d like to say I don’t agree this time, but when I say that I have to add a qualification. He’s certainly right: if this goes on, if things continue without any change, there isn’t much hope. Fred says:

This: Our racial policy has proved a disaster. Sixty years after Brown vs. the School Board, blacks have not assimilated. They constitute a separate people having almost nothing in common with the surrounding European society. They fiercely maintain their identity with their own music, dialect, customs, dress, and names. All attempts to turn them into middle-class whites in darker packaging have failed. Only relentless governmental pressure forces an appearance of partial integration.

Let’s consider a few awkward facts that loom ghoulishly above the body politic, which seems to be decomposing. First, on every known measure of cognitive ability, on IQ, SATs, GREs, everything, blacks average about one standard deviation, fifteen IQ points, below whites. The gap is a fact. It exists. It is reflected in performance. It has proved intractable. In a technological civilization that rewards intelligence, the deficit sharply limits legitimate access to the higher reaches of money, power, class, and prestige.

Second, blacks continue to show little interest in schooling. Exceptions and degrees, yes. Yet consider cities such as Washington, which usually has a black mayor, black city council, mostly black school board, black staffs in the schools, black parents, black students, a high per-capita expenditure—and perhaps the worst schools in the country. This is a fact, and shows no signs of diminishing. It is repeated in countless cities.

And, alas, it’s all true. Yet there’s hope: there are the projects in Harlem, and Chicago, which insist on excellence in education, and which succeed, often startlingly well. You don’t see much about them in the media. Once in a while 60 Minutes will focus on such an institution, but mostly they don’t, and there’s a reason. They emphasize discipline, good grooming, politeness, and cultural assimilation along with rigorous education. And they work. They are turning out Americans who are black. And thus they are all but ignored by the liberal intellectuals.

American liberals have decided to give up the Melting Pot, and Assimilation, for something called ‘diversity’; and that is fatal to a Republic like ours. As Bill Buckley used to be fond of pointing out, America was different: anyone could learn how to be an American. You could study it in books, or observe how your neighbors did things, and it worked. You can’t study to become a Swiss, or a Frenchman, or an Englishman. You can’t learn how to be a Swede. German Jews used to be divided over whether the question of assimilation, and there were heated intellectual discussions between Zionists and Assimilationists in the late 19th and early 20th Centuries. And you may recall the answer of the German middle class leader to the question of why Frau Schultz should not associate with Herr Schneider. “He is not a German.” (My reference, of course, is to ‘Cabaret’ which was based on Christopher Isherwood’s I Am A Camera, drawn from life observations in the decadent Berlin last days of the Weimar Republic. I saw and was impressed by both the staged musical and the movie, but the stage version was far better and much closer to the realities captured in the fiction.)

It used to be that America had a culture, and we regarded it as superior to any other – or, sometimes, more modestly, we insisted that whether or not it was better – there were many in academia who rated various European intellectual societies far above the American – it was ours, and it was what we had, and you were welcome to become part of it. The Melting Pot worked. Irish, Hungarian, Polish, Slavic, Italian, Sicilian, Lithuanian, Lebanese, Irish again, Italian again, and throughout the 19th Century Jews from many places came in waves to the United States, were looked down on, sometimes exploited, but over time admitted to the American culture, and over generations became powerful bearers, defenders, and transmitters of that culture. There were variants of the American culture – that’s what States are for, and that’s what freedom is for – but there were also basic axioms. One set of axioms was the set stated as ‘self evident’ in the Declaration of Independence.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That phrase was carefully drawn. What it meant when said, and what it means now, is that we are not going to question certain axioms: that there is a Creator, and that Creator endowed all our citizens with inalienable rights – but neither ‘happiness’ nor ‘property’ is among them. The original source was John Locke who proclaimed rights to life, liberty, and property. All the Framers endorsed that, in the sense that securing property rights was the whole point of the Rebellion, Revolution, Confederation, and finally the Constitution of 1789; but there was considerable disagreement over what the right to property meant. Does it mean that everyone ought to have some? Well, yes – but how should he acquire it? Not by taking it from someone else. Not by having the government take it from someone else. But he surely had the right to acquire it, and the right to have his possession defended by government. That was the next axiom:

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed

And that, too, was accepted by the Convention of 1787, whose task was to draft a document that would create the mechanisms by which the consent of the governed might be ascertained.

And all that was assumed as part of the American culture. Americans were assumed to believe that the Constitution derived its just powers from the consent of the governed. Note that there was never any question about the existence of government power. Everyone knew what that was. Power was force, forcing people to do things they had no consented to. The Constitution said, well, yes, you have consented to certain things even if you, personally, don’t much care for them. And here they are, as far as the power of the Federal government goes. And yes, you will obey, as the followers of the Whiskey Rebellion found when President Washington led troops to suppress them. The rebels, some of them veterans of Washington’s revolutionary army, dispersed rather than face overwhelming force led by the legendary Washington, and rally nothing much came of it; but the principle was established.

And over time an American culture was built, and over time the conditions for admission to it were defined. It wasn’t perfect, and it took generations for some ethnic groups to be so assimilated that no one remembered when they hadn’t been, and the only “diversity” happened on St. Patrick’s Day or Columbus Day (or festivals in honor of Kościuszko, or Greek Independence). For a while it appeared the Cinco de Mayo might join St Patrick’s day as a celebration of Americans of Mexican descent, rather than a rally of La Raza.

The assimilation of Blacks had a different history, but even in the legally segregated South it was happening. A series of civil rights acts were intended to enable black assimilation.

Now that is all challenged. Assimilation is no longer the goal. Now it is ‘diversity’. In rejecting American exceptionalism in favor of ‘diversity’ we have sown the wind. We now reap the whirlwind.

I differ from Fred in that I think it is not impossible that we turn back and forsake our foolish ways. I also fear that we will not. I do not think that America can survive diversity. Few Republics ever have. The United States was able to tolerate a great number of cultural differences – even to rejoice and enjoy them—but that was all predicated on the overall premise of American exceptionalism, that we could all sing America the Beautiful and God Bless America, and anyone who wouldn’t was a foreigner.

clip_image002[1]

I continue to catch up. All is returning to normal at Chaos Manor. Next I have to get to the Apple store to update my iPhone and iPad, and there’s a bunch of stuff like that (including getting Sable washed and groomed) but I should have some time at my desk now. It has been a hectic first quarter.

clip_image002[2]

Thanks to those who called my attention to this:

http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilderness-resources/blogs/sir-terry-pratchett-forges-a-sword-with-a-meteorite 

Sir Terry Pratchett forged his own sword base and had it created by an artist – and now hides it from the authorities who apparently don’t allow British landholders to have a sword in the house? Not only will there not always be an England, apparently there’s no longer an England. But they are further down the road to diversity than we are.

clip_image003[5]

I had not read the morning paper when I wrote the above, but in today’s Wall Street Journal is an editorial page essay “The Ugly Brutishness of Modern Britain” which tells more about the joys of diversity. It gives a number of examples of the utter collapse of civility and decent order in today’s diversified Britain, and ends

 

<clip>Multiculturalism is damaging because it denies that, when it comes to culture, there is a better and a worse, a higher and a lower—only difference. The word culture is used here in its anthropological sense, that is to mean the totality of behavior that is not directly biological.

Hence any conduct—lying scantily clad in a pool of vomit, for example—is part of a culture, and since all cultures, ex hypothesi, are of equal worth, no one has the moral right to criticize, much less forbid, any kind of behavior. And if I have to accept your culture, you have to accept mine. If you don’t like it—tough. Unfortunately, the lowest level of culture is the easiest to reach and, again ex hypothesi, there is no reason to aim higher.

Incivility in Britain thus has a militant or ideological edge to it. The uncivil British are not uncivilized by default—they actively hate and repudiate civilization.<clip>

We have not yet got there in these United States, but if we do not turn back from liberalism and restore the notion of a free republic as culturally superior to – or at least more desirable than – “diversity”, we are doomed.

clip_image003[5]

Then we have:

University echo chamber drowns out diverse voices

Debra J. Saunders

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/03/30/INLN1MNUVT.DTL#ixzz1scMGSQ1R

 

The report cites a number of studies that document academia’s political imbalance. In 2004, for example, researchers examined the voter registration of UC Berkeley faculty. They found a ratio of 8 Democrats for each Republican. While the ratio was 4:1 in the professional schools, in more political disciplines, the ratio rose to 17:1 in the humanities and 21:1 in social sciences.

Over the last few decades, the imbalance has grown.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/03/30/INLN1MNUVT.DTL#ixzz1scMd4HEG

Campus reading lists require trendy books instead of challenging authors, like Shakespeare, who can draw students deeper into the English language. Teach-ins are notoriously one-sided. College graduates today are less proficient as readers than past graduates. The National Center for Education Statistics found that only 31 percent of college graduates could read and explain a complex book. In 1961, students spent an average of 24 hours per week on homework; today’s students study for 14 hours per week.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/03/30/INLN1MNUVT.DTL#ixzz1scN2ERBz

And of course tuition rises, credentialism flourishes, and the beat goes on. Diversity pays if you’re in the business of forcing it down people’s throats.

clip_image003[5]

I note that the above is incomplete in one respect. It looks as if to be an American you have to believe in a Creator. After all, we put that at the heart of the Declaration, Lincoln used it in his justifications of his acts, and until recently every politician acted as if he believed it.

All true. But “acted as if he believed it” applied quite well to many of the Framers, who understood perfectly well that freedom of religion is not the same thing as having no religion. Many of the Framers – Franklin, Jefferson – had their doubts about the existence of a Creator and pretty well rejected the creeds of most of the large organized religions. Deism – a creator who built the Universe, but then took little notice of it afterwards, was popular among the intelligentsia of that time, and that included a number of the Framers. But what they insisted on was the acceptance of a moral code that wasn’t just the product of a legislature or a group of thinkers: it was something to be universally accepted, and we would operate within it. There might be doubts at the edges of it, but of one thing there was no doubt at all” right and wrong existed independent of the will of Congress. We will all agree to certain principles which seem pretty universal, in our dealings with each other. And yes, it is not a perfect union. We have deliberately overlooked slavery which many of those signing detested and many more disapproved of on moral grounds. Washington thought his duty to his family precluded emancipating his slaves while he was alive, but did so in his will, and Jefferson wished he had been a more prudent manager so that he could do the same.

But the existence of an exception to the agreed consensus on the scope of a general moral code only emphasizes more strongly the need for a moral code that pre-exists government and which pervades the society. Respect for some form or equality, and for life, liberty and property, is central to the endurance of self government. Once we reject that, once everything is up for grabs, when every culture is equal to every other, then of course the culture which says “I rule because I can” becomes as valid as one that says I rule because the governed consented to my rule. It becomes increasingly harder to object to the rule of Mubarak, Amin Dada

 

clip_image003[5]

 

RIP

Natasha Harris, 30. New Zealand wife and Mom. Died in February 2010, but cause
of death just now revealed: a heart attack brought on by critically low potassium
levels. Drank 8 to 10 Liters of Coca-Cola a day, waking up with it in the morning
and going to bed with it at night. Apparently ingested little else.

No Comment

clip_image003[5]

clip_image003[5]

clip_image003[5]

clip_image005

clip_image003[6]