Climate, Chinese traditional business practices, and more

Mail 700 Wednesday, November 09, 2011

Not surprised

Dr. Pournelle —

I can’t say I’m surprised by this. I know some who welcome such behavior.

"China Threatens Massive Venting of Super Greenhouse Gases in Attempt to Extort Billions as UNFCCC Meeting Approaches"

" In the run-up to the international climate negotiations in Durban later this month, China has responded to efforts to ban the trading of widely discredited HFC-23 offsets by threatening to release huge amounts of the potent industrial chemical into the atmosphere unless other nations pay what amounts to a climate ransom. "

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/china-threatens-massive-venting-of-super-greenhouse-gases-in-attempt-to-extort-billions-as-unfccc-meeting-approaches-2011-11-08

It never works to pay the Danegeld.

Pieter

And then there’s this:

Severe Defense Problems

This is a problem I’ve known about for years; you’ve been aware of it for at least a year — I emailed about this before.  Well, our government is still "talking" and "writing" about it:

<.>

"Sprinkling" sounds like a fairly harmless practice, but in the hands of sophisticated counterfeiters it could deceive a major weapons manufacturer and possibly endanger the lives of U.S. troops.

It’s a process of mixing authentic electronic parts with fake ones in hopes that the counterfeits will not be detected when companies test the components for multimillion-dollar missile systems, helicopters and aircraft. It was just one of the brazen steps described Tuesday at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing examining the national security and economic implications of suspect counterfeit electronics – mostly from China – inundating the Pentagon’s supply chain.

</>

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_MILITARY_COUNTERFEIT_PARTS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2011-11-08-13-41-48

—–

Most Respectfully,

Joshua Jordan, KSC

It is a traditional Chinese business practice to establish relations with a customer, then slowly over time degrade the product delivered until the customer complains. This is described in stories out of China dating back hundreds of years, involving both British and Japanese customers. It was not considered unethical by Chinese merchants.

But of course we now get a lot of our electronics including military electronics from Chinese factories. And most of our Internet stuff including routers.

clip_image002

NCDC data shows that the contiguous USA has not warmed in the past decade, summers are cooler, winters are getting colder

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/11/05/ncdc-data-shows-that-the-contiguous-usa-has-not-warmed-in-the-past-decade-summers-are-cooler-winters-are-getting-colder/

"So according the the National Climatic Data Center, it seems clear that for at least the last 10 years, there has been a cooling trend in the Annual mean temperature of the contiguous United States."

I was also interested in the discovery that 1934 was hotter than 1998 before it was cooler.

Graves

The evidence continues to come in: it’s not getting hotter just now. We are not on as long a cooling trend as we had in the 1970’s that caused so much concern about the possibility of a New Ice Age, but it has been a decade. Whether that applies to the entire Earth is a matter not easily settled because the average temperature of the Earth depends more on your model – the weights given to certain observations, whether you take air temperatures in the shade or exposed to the radiant environment, etc. – than anything else. By manipulating the samples and the weights you can get a significant change in the overall average temperature.

I think we can say that the way to bet is a slow rise in temperature since 1800 at about a degree a century; and superimposed on that linear model is the cyclical solar sunspot cycle; and over that a longer cycle whose cause we don’t know yet. We think it’s warming, but over the millennia we are still in an remission of a longer Ice Age. I don’t think the climate models know how to deal with that.

What Was Life Like In The Little Ice Age? – Part I

http://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2011/11/01/what-was-life-like-in-the-little-ice-age/

Life during the little ice age, both old world and new, northern and southern hemisphere.

For those who think it was just Europe.

Don’t be suprised if this winter is exceptionally cold, there is considerable data to show that we are in for a mild liltle ice age for the next several decades caused by a solar quieting which will likwely go for at least two solar cycles *we are not halfway through the first one yet, the next will be colder), and this winter we are into La Nina, which always results in cold. Individual results in differenct areas of the world may vary.

Legatus

So far as I can tell, there are enough fudge factors in the samples and weights used to calculate average temperatures to allow considerable swings in the final averages. I conclude that I do not ‘believe’ in any model that cannot take initial conditions in 1900 and output something similar to what was observed; I certainly would not trust such a model to predict the temperature in 2100. Why should I?

I am aware of the arguments that say there are no other factors involved so the models have to be more or less rights, but I am not convinced. I don’t know if we know all the factors. Arrhenius calculated some ‘extra’ warming would happen in the 20th Century due to industrial CO2, but I have yet to see that anyone has shown more warming in the 20th Century than there was in the 19th.

clip_image002[1]

On the coming ‘Cold Fusion’:

Rossi’s E-Cat

Dear Dr. Pournelle,

Just FYI, Rossi has a very, um, colorful past. He has been convicted and served prison sentences at least twice, once for smuggling gold, and once for claiming to have a process to convert garbage into oil (Petroldragon), which according to prosecutors, consisted of adding lime to the waste before dumping it in a landfill.

He also claimed to have invented a thermo-electric "heat-to-electricity" device that was five times more efficient than anything available. He convinced the Army to put money in to it, but never produced a working device. Here’s a link to the Army’s report: http://dodfuelcell.cecer.army.mil/library_items/Thermo(2004).pdf

Sincerely,

John Bresnahan

I have no more information. I do know there are Rossi believers and Rossi deniers, and I know people in each group.

clip_image002[2]

CERN FTL Data Accumulation

Jerry,

Concerning the letter today regarding the observation of apparent FTL neutrinos being a "statistical fluke," I think they were referring to the observation from the Dutch scientist that you posted at https://jerrypournelle.com/chaosmanor/?p=2624 .

(link to http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2394747,00.asp#fbid=iYm2szmfdD7 dated 15 October)

That said, I’ve been checking the CERN web site and have come across:

http://cdsweb.cern.ch/journal/CERNBulletin/2011/45/News%20Articles/1394597?ln=en

Posted 7 Nov 2011: since 21 October CERN has been conducting test runs of an approach to obtain better timing definition for next year’s larger run of induced neutrino measurements.

http://cdsweb.cern.ch/journal/CERNBulletin/2011/44/News%20Articles/1392338?ln=en

Posted 24 Oct 2011: Theorists have been looking at the data, but "(currently) there is no theoretical model that can accommodate the measurement." This reports a workshop on theoretical explanations on 14 October, before the ostensible date of publication of the Dutch paper.

So bottom line CERN has not yet accepted the "Dutch paper" as a contra-indication.

Jim

So we can hope the FTL is real, although I would not advise anyone to bet it that way.

clip_image002[3]

Hello Jerry,

How could ANYONE speak harshly about a government that provides a service like this?:

http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/8294-walnuts-are-drugs-says-fda

It is examples like this that provide affirmation, as if any were needed, that a government (like our current one) that consumes 50% or more of the gross national product is, by all rights, just a START.

One can only imagine our idyllic existence when it has, finally, expanded to 100% and provides optimum solutions to ALL our problems. Or at least all of them that anyone is willing to complain about in public.

Bob Ludwick

The Iron Law in action. The government engages in a very large number or activities that we don’t need and can’t afford. Some are silly. Not news but we often need reminding.

clip_image002[4]

Letter from England

The risk when a government releases a computer virus to the wild–people will copy it. http://preview.tinyurl.com/44kowgr

The UKBA decided to imitate the TSA, and ended up in a pit: http://preview.tinyurl.com/6g64tr7

Bankers challenged by Church for having slipped their moral moorings. http://preview.tinyurl.com/6fbxloz

Patent bubble? http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/11/04/is_there_a_patent_price_bubble/

Mandatory teacher training for university academics? http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=418019&c=1

Visa casualties: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=418020&c=1

"We do not understand how a country,… can produce people who seem to be acting without thinking, let alone making serious efforts to investigate the consequences of their actions." (Mary Evans in the Times Higher Education)

Harry Erwin

clip_image002[5]

UAVs & Pilots

Common sense has no place in military thinking.

http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htairfo/articles/20111107.aspx

Cheap energy = prosperity!

Drill here, DRILL NOW!

David Couvillon

Colonel, U.S. Marine Corps Reserve, Retired.;Former Governor of Wasit Province, Iraq;Righter of Wrongs; Wrong most of the time;Distinguished Expert, TV remote control;Chef de Hot Dog Excellance; Avoider of Yard Work

We devoted some space to the operations and doctrines requirements for employing a strategy of technology in, guess what, The Strategy of Technology by Possony, Pournelle, and Kane.

clip_image002[6]

does this bear hate Quantas?

Dr. Pournelle,

Possible "Koala?" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_cuscus

-d

clip_image003

Coup Against Google

The coup against Google forms in 2011:

<.>

Yahoo Inc , Microsoft Corp and AOL Inc have set up an advertising partnership as Google and Facebook’s online ad dominance grows.

</>

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/08/microsoft-aol-yahoo-idUSN1E7A724520111108

Make no mistake, this begins cooperation, communication, and consensus among three major Google advesaries — this could be a serious concern for Google in years to come. If this alliance could get Apple on board, this would be a commanding, powerful alliance. I do not see an alliance with MS and Apple, however. Though, I believe with Steve Jobs — and his historical conflicts with Bill Gates — out of the way this might be possible. It will be interesting to see what shape Apple takes with Jobs gone — both in terms of products and business strategies. But, anyone who knows the history of windows development, etc. knows that Jobs would never work with MS — never.

—–

Most Respectfully,

Joshua Jordan, KSC

Interesting questions. We can wait and see…

clip_image002[7]

One WTF item and something pretty cool

Not sure if you heard about this story:

http://blog.heritage.org/2011/11/08/obama-couldnt-wait-his-new-christmas-tree-tax/

It sounds like something completely unnecessary. Of course, this is just one more example of the Iron law.

On a lighter note, a pretty cool rendition of "Welcome to the Jungle":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AYEgwwCYWw&feature=share

Erik

Bunny Inspectors on steroid megadoses?

You thought bunny inspectors were bad? Wait until you see the Christmas Tree Commission.

http://blog.heritage.org/2011/11/08/obama-couldnt-wait-his-new-christmas-tree-tax/

Res ipsa loquitur, or some such.

Hm. Maybe some disgruntled Muslim could make a case for this being a clear violation of separation of church and state, Christmas being a religious holiday and all that…

John

I understand that President Obama has removed the Christmas Tree Tax, but I am not sure. Thanks

clip_image002[8]

iPAD Halloween Costume

Jerry,

You may remember that I was struggling to find a real use for the iPAD. Well, this engineer may have just the thing:

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-20127922-501465/a-bloody-incredible-ipad-halloween-costume/

Tracy Walters

clip_image003[1]

Jerry,

Subj: A blind spot for wind energy

http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/11/05/wind-farms-disrupting-radar-scientists-say/

Jim

There are places where wind makes sense, but not so many as most think. Intermittent power requires storage capabilities which generally cost more than the power itself.

clip_image002[9]

Subject: Record flight is step toward HYPERSONIC SPACE AIRSHIP

I suggest going to the site, there are some interesting animations:

Tracy Walters

Original URL: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/11/02/space_airships/

Record flight is step toward HYPERSONIC SPACE AIRSHIP Ion-drive dirigibles to orbit from aerial ‘Dark Sky’ base By Lewis Page <http://forms.theregister.co.uk/mail_author/?story_url=/2011/11/02/space_airships/>

Posted in Space <http://www.theregister.co.uk/science/space/> , 2nd November 2011 13:02 GMT <http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/11/02/>

Inventors in America are claiming an altitude record for airships after a recent test flight in which an unmanned electrically-propelled helium dirigible successfully manoeuvred under power at 95,085 feet above the Black Rock Desert in Nevada. The "Tandem" craft is intended to demonstrate the first stage of radical plans which would see enormous, permanently inhabited "Dark Sky Stations" floating high in the atmosphere at the edge of space – to act as bases for radical hypersonic airships which would slowly fly themselves into orbit over a period of days using hybrid ion drive propulsion.

Somewhat more conventional extreme-high-altitude airships along the lines of the Tandem, flown above Nevada on October 22, would serve as shuttles carrying people and cargoes from the surface up to the colossal, mile-wide Dark Sky air/spaceports floating at 140,000 feet up.

The "Airship to Orbit" scheme comes to us from American DIY volunteer space collective JP Aerospace <http://www.jpaerospace.com/> [1], founded by engineer John Powell, which has been developing high altitude balloons, rockets and combo rocket/balloon missions (aka rockoons, or in the parlance of our own Special Projects Bureau, ballockets) since 1979. JP Aerospace has now moved on beyond conventional rockoon flights to work on the use of small unmanned Dark Sky Stations <http://www.jpaerospace.com/dssoverview.html> [2] as bases for vertical rocket launches starting from high up on the edge of space.

Both the Tandem and the prototype Dark Sky Station already flown use conventional helium balloons for lift, linked together by lightweight carbon-fibre trusses slung beneath. The Tandem features electrically driven propellors designed for the thin air found up at 100,000 feet and higher. One particularly neat trick is JP Aerospace’s use of tied-down bags on the ground in which to inflate their balloons, meaning that there’s no need to wait for windless conditions to make a launch.

Future manned ground-to-Dark-Sky ships and Dark Sky bases would use similar but more polished structures which would resemble huge cylinders of helium with lightweight keels running along them. Technically the ships would not be blimps – that’s the term for airships without a rigid structure, which maintain their shape purely by internal pressure – but semi-rigids.

According to Powell, the two different types of ship and the intervening aerial base stations are vital as neither craft could survive the flight regime of the other. The vast, flimsy orbital vessels would be torn apart by the dense winds of the lower atmosphere, and the sturdier surface-launched jobs could never reach orbital velocity.

Behold the Mach 20 hypersonic hybrid ion rocket semi-rigid airship!

The underlying concepts at least of the surface-to-base craft and the Dark Sky outposts themselves seem to be feasible, but JP Aerospace has understandably yet to really do much in the way of flight tests on the mighty orbital rocket airships. Are they really feasible? Can massive gossamer envelopes full of helium gradually boost themselves up to Mach 20+ using slow-acting electrical ion drives (such as those used <http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/07/goce_engines/> [3] to keep low-flying satellites up to orbital speed despite drag from the upper traces of the atmosphere)? Even though there’s very little air up there, surely a giant, hypersonic rocket airship is a big ask.

Powell recently gave an interview <http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/10/floating-airship-could-radically-reduce.html> [4] on the subject to nextbigfuture.com, in which he points out that upper-atmosphere weather balloons have already achieved Mach 10 as long ago as the 1960s, so that in his view Mach 20 isn’t impossible with modern materials. In fact in his judgement what’s called for is not a super-low-thrust but ultra-efficient ion drive, nor a conventional chemical rocket, but rather a hybrid of the two – which he describes as "the most efficient chemical rocket ever, or the least efficient ion rocket". The key issue will be whether enough electrical power can be stored at a low enough weight – either using fuel cells or batteries, solar panels can’t do the job – to get the ships up to orbital poke. One cunning aspect of the plan is that the ships will not need any heat shield for re-entry as they will slow down so gradually (using drag in the evanescent upper atmosphere) that no appreciable heating will result.

Powell and his crew certainly don’t lack for ambition. The idea is that the mighty Dark Sky floating spaceports would also carry telecoms equipment and tourist hotels to generate additional revenue on top of that gleaned from orbital launch. Their analysis suggests that the hypersonic airships could haul cargo into space for as little as $100 per pound in the near term and eventually just $1 per pound – and Powell sees manned flights to the Dark Sky region as soon as 2013, and permanent inhabited bases there from 2021. He says that JP Aerospace never makes a flight unless it will pay for itself, with revenue coming so far from advertising, telecoms experiments and aerospace tests for companies such as Lockheed.

It’s interesting stuff, but progress has been slow – 33 years after commencement Powell and Co and are still doing small unmanned tests on the more achievable parts of their scheme. Larger craft such as the "Ascenders" – more like the massive V-shaped craft envisaged for the future ground-to-Dark Sky leg – are not flying at the moment. We probably shouldn’t hold our breath waiting for the hypersonic space airships.

Even so, Powell’s team is plainly one to watch, especially in light of the Reg’s own aspirations <http://www.theregister.co.uk/science/special_projects_bureau/> [5] in the rockoon/ballocket space plane arena.

clip_image002[10]

Professor fired

Professor fired for making students think?

http://www.good.is/post/was-a-professor-fired-for-requiring-students-to-think/

–Gary P.

—————-

Is this a consequence of the government getting involved in employment

relationships? Where hiring and firing decisions are based upon evidence,

not good judgment. So objective criterion is needed.

clip_image003[2]

clip_image002[11]

clip_image005

clip_image002[12]

Who’s Afraid of Cain?

View 700 Wednesday, November 09, 2011

clip_image002

The Herman Cain story continues. After him will come Newt Gingrich. Tonight’s debate will be important. The reason for the increasing shrillness of the attacks is desperation: the liberal establishment has concluded that Obama is vulnerable, possibly even doomed, and of the Republican candidates only Romney appears to be someone they can work with, someone who can grow in office, who will reach across the aisle to continue liberal programs.

Note that Romney has nothing to do with the attacks on Cain. He’s just the guy the media consider to be the lesser of a number of evils. They can work with him.

As to Cain: The charges and specifications are still unclear, as is the number of accusers anonymous and identified. Are there four or five? Have more than two identified themselves? Why come forward now, 14 years after the incidents supposedly took place (about the time of the Clinton Lewinsky affair). If Cain is a serial harasser, why have there been no incidents in this millennium?

As of now the most serious charge is actual touching someone in what amounts to a spectacularly inept pass in a car parked or stopped on a District of Columbia street. The story makes it appear that Cain expected sexual gratification on the spot. The woman, not an employee but a job seeker, said no, and the incident ended without any actual sexual encounter. If the entire incident happened as Bialek describes, it is not sexual harassment, but it would be an assault and battery without injury. It happened 14 years ago, and no charges were ever filed.

No other charge alleges an assault. To the extent that anyone knows, they all involve “inappropriate gestures” at least one of which was “not of a sexual nature.” One or more might sustain a charge of ‘sexual harassment’ in that there was an employee relationship in some cases, but that would have to be a charge against his employer. At least one of the cases was formally reported to the employer and there was an investigation and settlement. The settlement involved termination of the employee and the details are not available, but none of the rumors involves any large amounts of money: the settlements are all far lower than would have been the costs if an actual suit had been filed, and there are many precedents for actions like that.

We do know that President Clinton made much larger settlements, and a great deal more than inappropriate offers or requests were made by him. He also said that he never had sex with that woman, then after the appearance of the dress stained with the Presidential DNA he redefined what “have sex” means. He was twice elected President of the United States.

Cain says he never did anything of the kind, specifically that he hasn’t acted inappropriately with anyone, not fifteen years ago and not since. His defense is innocence. That is hard to prove – how can you prove that you did not do something when the charge is ambiguous, and the specification nebulous? But the Bialek case is specific, and by its nature there is no possibility of witnesses or evidence. She says he did it, he says it did not happen. It all happened 14 years ago. No charges were made, no suits were filed, Cain did not get her a job. Cain has gone for broke here: this isn’t a case of misinterpretation. One of them is flat lying.

The President of the United States was impeached, not for inappropriate sexual advances, but for lying. Interestingly enough, it is not easy to find a copy of the formal Articles of Impeachment that were passed by the House and sent to the Senate; they involved perjury under oath. But then Martha Stewart has been convicted of perjury not under oath for denying to a federal investigator an act that was not itself a crime, so things are fairly murky there – my point being that it will be easy for the Administration and the media to keep this matter alive. Next step might be to have a Federal Elections Commission inspector ask Cain, possibly in a public place; that would allow them to bring charges against him if he continues the denial and the accusations continue. No conviction is needed, and indeed the matter need not come to trial: it’s unlikely that any major party will nominate a candidate for President who is out on bail.

Are the Obama supporters that afraid of Cain? Would they go that far?

A few years ago I would have said that was too farfetched to be credible even in a science fiction story. Now I have to ask. And I don’t know.

The purpose of all this is to eliminate Cain as a candidate.

Newt will be next. Then anyone else who isn’t Romney. The attack machine will be silent on Romney until he is the nominee. Then it will begin again, but it will be a different attack.

If all this reminds us of the end of the Republic in Rome, with Pompey and Cicero and Caesar and Clodius crashing a females-only party, and the street gangs burning public buildings, and mercenaries hired as candidate bodyguards, and the unemployed veterans demonstrations and — Well, it won’t remind many, because our schools no longer teach anything about that. I wonder what the Legions think of Cain?

clip_image002[1]

Odd stories at links that may interest you, but I didn’t feel like writing about.

Google Beer:

http://www.reghardware.com/2011/10/07/google_launches_own_brand_of_beer/ 

linecrow

Climate change story continues

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2055191/Scientists-said-climate-change-sceptics-proved-wrong-accused-hiding-truth-colleague.html

linecrow[3]

AP Exclusive: Cain Accuser Complained in Next Job

http://www2.wsls.com/news/2011/nov/09/ap-exclusive-cain-accuser-complained-in-next-job-ar-1447447/

linecrow[3]

Internet Legends

http://rjwhite.tumblr.com/post/472668874/fact-checking

linecrow[3]

Why U.S. military in Uganda? Soros fingerprints all over it

Obama’s billionaire friend has interests in African country’s oil

Read more: Why U.S. military in Uganda? Soros fingerprints all over it http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=356321#ixzz1dFMpUCRo

I have no idea why we are in Uganda, or whether we are doing any good there. I have a couple of sources, but no new information.

linecrow[3]

Students’ weakness in maths leaves academics counting the cost

     This is a story of some importance, but it belongs as part of a longer essay I am still working on.

http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=417361&c=1

 

clip_image002[9]

clip_image002[10]

clip_image005

clip_image002[11]

Fawkes and other non-breaking news

View 700 Monday, November 07, 2011

I have a three hour medical appointment – it’s a class, not an emergency – this afternoon, so today will be truncated.

Several readers have noted that we didn’t celebrate Guy Fawkes day. The definitive book on that was done by one of my favorite historians and essayists, C Northcote Parkinson, but the book is long out of print and there never has been an eBook copy that I know of. There seem to be a number of interesting books that are caught in the void here – no one seems to be interested in making eBooks of them. Parkinson died in 1993 so his books will be in copyright for a long time. He was twice a widower and his third wife did not long survive him, and if there are any children I never know of them, so I have no idea who controls his literary estate. Someone ought to get his books into eBook format. They are ail interesting enough and I would wager that collectively they would sell a few thousand copies a year, but someone would have to get them properly formatted.

This is a good topic for an essay: how can we reform this system so that there is an incentive to get such books available to those who want to read them? We don’t need a government program, we merely need a way to guarantee payment to copyright owners while allowing an incentive to those who want to do this.  I am not sure how to make that work. Google tried and ended up in lawsuits. Lawsuits are of course a larger problem than just this.

clip_image002

In the not doing breaking news department, we still have no idea what Cain is accused of. One story is that one of the anonymous accusers was made to feel uncomfortable in a hotel room, but further rumour saith not.

Gloria Allred says she will break a story at the Friar’s Club this afternoon, complete with accuser and details. The world awaits breathlessly.

I am reminded by attorney friends that an association like the National Restaurant Association might well find it expedient to offer a year’s salary as severance to an employee claiming sexual harassment against the Association (since the Association, not the harasser, is liable and thus must defend) to make it all go away, since the alternative would cost more than that in attorney fees plus the time of the principals, the harassment of ‘discovery’ hearings, and the whole panoply of events that take place once a suit is filed. There is little upside to fighting the case even if the win is a slam dunk. It will cost more to win it than to settle it out of hand, leave alone the public relations effects. There is almost no upside to fighting it.

We have a system very friendly to the plaintiff bar in the US, and there are plenty of shakedowns in the name of equality. The Americans with Disabilities Act generates thousands of meritless cases that are settled simply to get rid of them: it costs more to win than to pay. In California one lawyer filed cases against Vietnamese nail parlors, accumulating hundred. Since the plaintiff was his own lawyer it cost him little to file hundreds of cases and then offer to settle. Then one day he was shot down in the street by a Vietnamese gang member said to be somehow related to a parlor owner. That seems to have ended the great spate of lawsuits against Vietnamese nail parlors in California.

So far all the allegations against Cain appear to be of the “made to feel uncomfortable” variety rather than the explicit proposition variety, but I make no doubt that they can find someone to accuse him of almost anything: the stakes are very high here. As Clarence Thomas found. If Cain is a boor it will come out, with explicit incidents cited. So far we have only rumor, and in many cases rumor of rumor.

Anyway, I need to get ready for my walk, and my appointment is early afternoon and lasts all day.

 

clip_image002[1]

For those interesting in the legal technicalities of sexual harassment, see “Sexual Harassment’s Legal Morass” by Curt Levey in today’s Wall Street Journal. I hadn’t had a chance to read it before my walk this morning. It gives the details of just why a restaurant association might wish to settle cases before they can be filed if the cost is low enough. It’s clear enough to me that we have a morass, and much of it has been built buy a series of federal laws and regulations over matters more properly – and more expediently – left to the States.

There is now an actual accuser and specification of charges against Cain. She has hired the rather expensive Gloria Allred but does not want to sue. Her specification is that she went to Cain in hopes that he would help her get a job with the Restaurant Association, and he groped her in a car. There is no allegation that he went further, or that he got her a job. There are no witnesses or evidence. Bill Clinton settled a similar matter with an $850,000 payment to Paula Jones. All the relevant web sites are overloaded as one might expect.

One political note: when Clinton as governor engaged or was alleged to have engaged in various sexual hijinks while he was Governor of Arkansas, it did not end his career. He was elected and then re-elected. This was, after all, a white man indulging in playful dalliance. Clarence Thomas when faced with sexual harassment charges stated that it’s a more serious matter when a black man is accused of such behavior. For a good part of the United States that may still be true. Given Allred’s capabilities and connections this accusation will get a lot of press attention. A white governor of Arkansas who has contempt for the military is given more political indulgence than a black self-made businessman. That’s a political reality. How much that matters among Republican primary voters isn’t clear but it is certainly significant.

We appear to be in for another couple of weeks of this, rather than a discussion of the critical issues in this critical election. Meanwhile Greece continues to show us what is going to happen to the United States. See “A Look Inside the Super Committee” by Stephen Moore on just how much good we are likely to get out of present measures. The Democrats want more money and few cuts, and for that matter more spending. Greece, here we come.

 

clip_image002[8]

For another story that will not go away, the Daily Mail is telling us

Scientist who said climate change sceptics had been proved wrong accused of hiding truth by colleague

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2055191/Scientists-said-climate-change-sceptics-proved-wrong-accused-hiding-truth-colleague.html#ixzz1d3IaAfZ0 

And the beat goes on.

clip_image002[9]

clip_image002[10]

clip_image005

clip_image002[11]

Cain, FTL, and Fannie

View 699 Sunday, November 06, 2011

I just did a big mail collection. Alas I still do not seem to have mastered the art of links in this new text editing system. I sure miss FrontPage. I don’t know why the new editing system can’t do things we were doing with FrontPage over a decade ago. I guess it’s progress.

It’s cold in Los Angeles, and the weather seems to have affected me a bit.

clip_image002

Here is an excellent question:

Herman Cain

I was wondering if you’d heard whether Mr. Cain is accused of "classic" sexual harassment, (Using a position of authority to obtain sex.) or "contemporary" sexual harassment, (Offending a women.)? I suspect if one looked closely that the impetus behind this fresh airing of old dirty laundry is from the beneficiaries of the complexities in the tax code rather than liberals. Anyone who wants to simplify taxes had better be squeaky clean, independently wealthy and bring a much bigger shovel than Mr. Cain.

Good health to you and yours,

Tim Harness.

The answer is that we don’t know, do we? So far as I can tell there are no specific specifications, so one can’t say. He can be accused of anything you can imagine. We have this from Reuters

But a woman who received a cash settlement from the restaurant association in response to her harassment claim rejected Cain’s denials on Friday. She said through her lawyer that she was the victim of a "series of inappropriate behaviors and unwanted advances" by Cain in 1999.

But that doesn’t specify who proposed what to whom, and whether any of the propositions were accepted. We don’t know who the women were. We can be pretty sure that no actual sex took place and no soiled dress will appear in evidence, but even that’s an inference. And the beat goes on. http://www.arcamax.com/thefunnies/wizardofid/s-973370

clip_image002[1]

Mike Powers provides this:

A couple weeks back, before the "FTL neutrinos" turned out to be just round-off error, you were speculating about whether FTL information transfer could create an apparent causality violation.

Here, xkcd notes that we already have a similar thing, as far as earthquakes are concerned: http://xkcd.com/723/=

Hilarious!

But I had not heard that the FTL neutrinos were a round-off error. If that proves to be true it would hardly be startling, but it is disappointing.

clip_image002[2]

And we have this question:

On Fannie, Freddie, and the financial collapse

Jerry, you have occasionally cited Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for their responsibility for the recent financial unpleasantness. Michael Bloomberg recently expounded the same theme.

I thought you might be interested in a review on Andrew Sullivan’s page of various arguments for and against this thesis:

http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2011/11/dish-check-who-caused-the-financial-collapse-not-fannie-and-freddie.html

The conclusion seems to be that Fannie and Freddie were corrupt and badly designed, but played at most a marginal role in the bubble and collapse.

I’d welcome reading your perspective on these arguments.

Best,

Jon

It is my understanding that absent the nearly unlimited funds of Fannie and Freddie the bubble would have collapsed much earlier. Fannie and Freddie were able to buy those toxic loans and bundle them, using them as the capital against which they could issue more loans. The whole scheme was madness, but the commissions were so high that everyone had to get in on it. That of course is how Madoff worked. But in this case it could flow on longer because there was government money backing the whole play. Suppose Madoff had been able to borrow Fed money at essentially 0% interest; how long would his play have continued?

I am no expert on this.

My own view is that Fannie and Freddie were too big and should not have been allowed to become so. But then I think any organization that is too big to fail ought to be broken up into smaller pieces. Perhaps a progressive tax on market share above, say, 20%? But that’s pure speculation and half baked thought. I don’t know how to avoid the enormous concentrations of wealth that we are undergoing. I don’t want to penalize success, but I do think success ought to be involved with providing goods and services, not moving money in circles and taking in each others washing. I probably need to spend more time thinking this through.

clip_image002[12]

clip_image002[13]

clip_image004

clip_image002[14]