Earth is Warming!; high tech lynchings

View 699 Monday, October 31, 2011

The high tech lynchings begin, as we all expected. See below.

image2

News Flash: the planet is warming. The Earth (or at least the land) is 1.6 degrees F warmer today than it was in 1950. It really truly is getting warmer. Now 1.6 F is 0.88 C. Subtract 1950 from 2010 and I believe that is 60, which is .6 of a century. The general observation has been since Arrhenius that the Earth is warming at about 1 degree C per century, or about 0.6 C per sixty years.

You might keep that in mind when you read today’s Climate Change Headlines from the morning papers. Typical is the Washington Post:

WASHINGTON — A prominent physicist and skeptic of global warming spent two years trying to find out if mainstream climate scientists were wrong. In the end, he determined they were right: Temperatures really are rising rapidly.

The study of the world’s surface temperatures by Richard Muller was partially bankrolled by a foundation connected to global warming deniers. He pursued long-held skeptic theories in analyzing the data. He was spurred to action because of “Climategate,” a British scandal involving hacked emails of scientists.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/industries/skeptics-own-study-finds-climate-change-real-but-says-scientists-should-be-more-critical/2011/10/31/gIQAYjXQYM_story.html

Further down in the article we find

Muller’s research team carefully examined two chief criticisms by skeptics. One is that weather stations are unreliable; the other is that cities, which create heat islands, were skewing the temperature analysis.

“The skeptics raised valid points and everybody should have been a skeptic two years ago,” Muller said in a telephone interview. “And now we have confidence that the temperature rise that had previously been reported had been done without bias.”

Which is heartening. It is always good to find that the data are not biased. I have not found that Muller has proved the accuracy of these great averages to a tenth of a degree (either Fahrenheit or Centigrade), but that wasn’t what he set out to do. I note that all the charts I can find show that the Earth has warmed from about -0.4 to about +1.4 degrees C from around 1860 to 2005, with various measures of possible error, and this general approximation seems agreed to by nearly everyone who studies the trends over that long a time. I note that during the 1940 to 1980 period there was a very general consensus that the Earth was cooling and that Schneider, Margaret Mead, and others were very concerned about the return of the Ice Age – See Schneider’s book The Genesis Strategy. I know that it is now explained as a general exhortation against pollution and in favor of prudence, but I also know that I interviewed Schneider when the book came out in 1976, and everyone including Schneider was concerned about a return of the ice ages. This was the consensus position of the period, and one I shared.

The concern was over an apparent 0.2 C cooling of the Earth from the 1940’s to the 1970’s.

At the time I questioned the accuracy of the measurements. That wasn’t from any theoretical objection to the notion of a return of the Ice; it reflected my experience in trying to get accurate temperature measurements during my aerospace career. It’s a lot harder to get accuracies to 0.1 degree (C or F) than you might think even when what you are measuring is human skin temperature, or the ‘average’ temperature of a chamber in which both air and radiant temperatures are changing. It’s hard to get a good agreed definition and measurement of the average temperature in an aircraft assembly factory, where there are hot spots (welder torches, as an example) and bright spotlights (radiant heat sources, some drastic), uncontrolled air currents (some foremen provide fans they bought in the drug store), both confined and open spaces, brightly lit high bay areas and deeply shadowed areas with no radiant temperature, and many other such factors.

My point is that it was then, and is now, difficult to get good definitions and measurements of temperature to anything like a tenth of a degree; but to the extent that we have measurements we can agree on, they all point to a consistent rise in Earth temperature of about 1 degree C per century, and that this trend has been going on since 1800. Prior to 1300 the temperature was cooling at some fraction of a degree per century. Of course it’s pretty hard to get a good estimate of the temperature of the Earth in Viking times. We do have gross reports, such as settlements in Greenland, vineyards in Scotland, longer growing seasons around monasteries in France and Germany, crop bonuses in China, and whatever we can infer from tree rings and such things; but I don’t think I could infer the Earth temperature in the year 2000 to anything like a tenth of a degree from such records.

So the planet is warming. We knew that.

What surprises me is the lack of concern about CO2 and ocean acidity. That, it seems to me, is potentially a greater danger than any warming trend, and I don’t see a lot of studies of that. I am sure I need to look harder. But that has enough potential damage that it might well be worth finding ways to take CO2 out of the ocean, such as by encouraging plankton blooms; I’d sure like to see more of those studies.

But the headlines are that the Earth is warming and even a “skeptic” agrees!

This is supposedly discussed here http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/10/29/uh-oh-it-was-the-best-of-times-it-was-the-worst-of-times/#more-50286 but I haven’t had a chance to dig through it; it seems more complicated than I’d think it needs to be. Perhaps I am having a fit of absence of mind.

image2

The High Tech Lynching of Cain will continue, now that the establishment has discovered that he is a serious candidate.

He has both the virtues and defects of a political amateur. He also has a record of taking good advice. So the latest charge is that he made non-sexual inappropriate gestures to some women some years ago. We should ask Clinton if that disqualifies him from being President.

image2

Can someone tell me what is a “Simple Western”? Clearly I am isolated from some important news. Today’s SCIENCE magazine was sent to me with a stick-on page cover containing my address – no question that the American Association for the Advancement of Science has given this outfit my address – telling me to rejoice, the gel-free, blot-free, hands free Simple Western is here. There is some reference to proteinsimple and a young man is ecstatic because he can simply push a button and walk away. There is also a web site, www.simplewestern.com. And nothing else. And a web search took me to a pernicious web site that – well, you’d have to look at it, but I warn you there may be some who enjoy such antics by supposedly intelligent people but I find it annoying  — and baffling because they still don’t tell me what this procedure is supposed to accomplish. Does it diagnose? Make me high? Make me smarter? Give me a secret path to John Wayne movies? I suppose I could cruise the web long enough to find out, but I don’t intend to bother. I am astonished that the AAAS has been a party to this.

Advice: if you want to sell a service to intelligent people – and I would presume that subscribers to SCIENCE are – then you might want to tell them what your product does. Don’t assume that just because they are intelligent they will automatically be familiar with whatever the heck you do.

Another web site tells me

ProteinSimple has developed Simple Western assays as an alternative to traditional Western blot analysis for protein sizing and quantitative immunodetection. Assays are performed on Simon, an instrument that integrates and automates all manual operations associated with Western blotting without the use of gels, transfer tanks, blots or film. Researchers just load their samples, press start, walk away and return to fully analyzed experimental results.

which tells me that those who are likely to want to buy a machine for doing this are very likely to know what it is. And the elaborate ads convince me that doing a Simple Western required expensive equipment so there’s a lot of profit in selling this stuff. So perhaps paying for a cover sticker on SCIENCE makes sense. But I still have no idea of what a Simple Western is. Am I that far behind in the – I would guess biological – sciences? 

But I am really concerned that scientists might be influenced to buy a particular brand of expensive machine by THIS ad.

 

AND MY THANKS to all who sent me explanations. It will be in MAIL later. I know now, and thanks again.

 

image2

Department of disturbing new items:

The radio is announcing on the regular news – I have heard this twice – that in one restaurant in China you can visit a cage full of Koala bears, choose one, pay Twenty-two ($22.00), and have the animal served either broiled or braised. I know no more about it than that, but I would have thought that live Koala Bears cost more than that?  More if I learn more.

image2

 

 

 

image2

image6

image2

Economics and another mixed bag

Mail 698 Friday, October 28, 2011

clip_image002

Subj: Video: MIT and Harvard economists: "Attention: Deficit disorder!"

http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2011/federal-deficit-panel-1006.html?tr=y&auid=9754887

I was disappointed — but not really surprised, alas! — that none of the participants mentioned (much less agreed with) Milton Friedman’s observation, that the burden on the economy is *not* the deficit, but the *spending*. Getting to a zero deficit with government spending eighty percent of GDP will not be an improvement.

Rod Montgomery==monty@starfief.com

One needs a degree in economics (which assumes all kinds of behavior and non-interference from politics before its moels are of any use at all) to believe that one can continue to spend more than you have and not get into trouble. Now there is a difference between borrowing as an investment and borrowing for current expenses, and an even greater difference between borrowing for investment and borrowing for a pleasure trip or a vacation or for luxuries or even “just to have a little better standard of living.”

When I was at Boeing I decided that the space program, which I vigorously supported (and I was on the Boeing team for both space and space proposals) – I decide that the space program’s problems were political not technical. We knew how to do this stuff. Boeing was willing to pay so long as I got my work done. I chose political science rather than economics because it was clear to me that economics was more concerned with its models than with reality. It was also clear that politics trumped economics every time, and understanding politics would be a requirement for getting the space program going.

But I did spend some time trying to understand economics, at least as a practical matter. One observation: Boeing required new hires in the factory are to have their own basic tool kit. The company provided heavy tools, but your basic aviation mechanic tool kit was up to you (just as I had to buy my own stethoscope, but that’s another story). There was a company on Boeing property that would sell you the approved tools for not much down and a monthly paycheck deduction. It was a concession, not owned by Boeing, and how company management chose that company I don’t know; but it illustrated borrowing for investment. If you had a job as an aviation mechanic and didn’t have the tools – most new hires came out of high school and this was often a first job so few did – then it made a lot of sense to borrow a good bit of money in order to have the tools of the trade. Boeing’s advantage out of that was that you had a big incentive to keep your job: Boeing was the only aerospace job in Seattle, and there were lots of recruiters trying to get trained Boeing workers to move to Southern California. (One got to me eventually; but I’ve told that story before. Boeing and I parted company on good terms.) Factory workers who hadn’t paid off their tool kit investment had a good incentive to stay with Boeing at least long enough to get that paid off. The point is that the tool kit was a good investment well worth borrowing money for. It would not have made sense to borrow that much money for a trip to Los Vegas.

I discovered that it took a long time of elementary economics theory study before you got to one that understood that principle. There were other such principles that everyone knew, but economics formally didn’t until you got really advanced.

Political philosophy made more sense.

It still does, but I am astonished at how many political theorists believe that economics understands as much about economics as an experienced aviation mechanic does. The difference is that the mechanic is persuaded that the professor knows more than he does. Don’t we wish…

But we have tried Keynes, and the theory that frivolous spending can stimulate an economic boom. It didn’t and doesn’t. And buying a county a year’s worth of new hire police who will then have to be paid out of new local taxes after the first year makes sense only if your goal is to raise taxes. The goals of most of the new economic plans it to continue the monotonic rise in spending. Jobs would be nice, but the spending seems to be the real goal.

We all know that low taxes (having the US occupation force pay for your defense helps a lot), and economic freedom and produce an economic miracle. And we need one. It is a bit harder for us because we need the military in this dangerous world; but that’s all the more reason to cut needless spending on what is as best a luxury. Whether or not bunny inspectors do any good for the bunnies, they certainly are a drain on the rabbit breeding business. And that’s just a trivial example. There are far larger ones. And none of them can be cut.

And just in, Huntsman on Too Big to Fail

http://professional.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204346104576635033336992122.html?mod=opinion_newsreel&mg=reno-wsj 

clip_image002[1]

Cold fusion tested commercially

Dear Dr Pournelle,

perhaps you’ll find this interesting:

http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-10/28/cold-fusion

Like the FTL neutrinos, fascinating if true.

Regards,

Rolf Andreassen.

I would love for it to be true, but I get about 20 cold fusion alerts a year and have for a decade. Alas none actually work out. One was intriguing enough that I got someone I trusted to pay a visit to the place. The chap had overlooked an energy source. Alas. Most don’t get that far.

I have heard much about the Bologna experiment, but I have seen little reproducible data. Alas.

clip_image002[2]

Switchblade Secretly Sent To Afghanistan

October 28, 2011: The U.S. Army <http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htweap/20111028.aspx> recently revealed that it sent some Switchblade UAV systems to Afghanistan last year, for secret field testing. This was apparently successful. It appears that Switchblade is currently used largely by Special Forces and other special operations troops. In September, it was announced that, after a year of successful testing, the army was ordering over a hundred Switchblade UAVs for troop use.

The Switchblade is a one kilogram (2.2 pound) expendable (used only once) UAV that can be equipped with explosives. The Switchblade is launched from its shipping and storage <http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htweap/20111028.aspx> tube, at which point wings flip out, a battery powered propeller starts spinning and a vidcam begins broadcasting images to the controller. The Switchblade is operated using the same gear the larger (two kg/4.4 pound) Raven UAV employs.

Switchblade can also be launched from the 70mm rocket tubes used on army helicopters. Moving at up to a kilometer a minute, the Switchblade can stay in the air for 20-40 minutes (depending on whether or not it is armed with explosives.) The armed version can be flown to a target and detonated, having about the same explosive effect as a hand grenade. Thus the Switchblade could be useful for ground troops, to get at an enemy taking cover in a hard to see location. Switchblade completed development <http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htweap/20111028.aspx> two years ago. Technically a guided missile, the use of Switchblade as a reconnaissance tool encouraged developers to refer to it as a UAV.

http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htweap/20111028.aspx

John

I need to think about this one.

clip_image002[3]

What the US could learn from the British Empire

The desire to send you this link – perhaps you have already seen it –

drove me to re-subscribe: happy to be on board once more!

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/oct/27/what-america-could-learn-from-the-british-empire-f/

Best,

Geoff

Welcome aboard again. And yes, there are things we can learn from the Brits. As we learned from Thatcher.

clip_image002[4]

You Just Can’t Make This Stuff Up

Jerry,

While we all try and remember that ‘Despair is a Sin’, and try to figure out just where we are going and why we all in this handbasket, it is possible to find considerable wry amusement by reading the headlines in the various newspapers.

From today’s Washington Examiner:

"Muslims at Catholic University complain about crosses

And the DC Human Rights Commission is taking it seriously."

Does this mean the service academies are in jeopardy since attendance at Chapel is mandatory??

Warm Regards,

Larry Cunningham

clip_image002[5]

Subj: Methinks Ms. Noonan finally gets it

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203554104577002262150454258.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop

The Divider vs. the Thinker

While Obama readies an ugly campaign, Paul Ryan gives a serious account of what ails America.

I mentioned this in today’s View.

clip_image002[6]

Anthropogenic Climate Change

Regarding climate change; it is interesting to me that a major source of anthropogenic climate change – and this time one that is real and just about undeniable – is being studiously ignored. Perhaps because there is a cultural angle, and it is one that tends against "traditional" cultures particularly in the fringes of the Sahara.

One of the major causes of desertification is overgrazing by domestic animals, in areas already marginal at best such as the Saharan fringes. This has been going on for millennia. The only real way around this is to change the culture of the relevant areas; and this is precisely what the PC brigade (who are quite ready to make massive changes to Western culture for far less provable reasons) don’t want to admit.

Regards, Ian

Ian Campbell

One of the first things I learned in undergraduate ecology from Rufus King was the role of the goat in the climate change that took the North African coast from being a breadbasket to a near desert. Climate change indeed. Bring in the goats and see what happens. But I doubt that is studied any longer.

Goats, unlike cattle or even sheep, are extremely efficient at eating all the vegetation, including digging up – rooting out – the roots. The result is that the rain runs off, the land gets drier and hotter, the clouds stay higher and drop less rain, and — well you get the idea. It can be described in good mathematical models, provided you know the prevailing wind patterns. Of course this can alter the wind patterns, but not always. Sometimes the feedback is positive, as it was in parts of North Africa. Bring in the goats and make your own desert.

clip_image002[7]

Brooklyn man pleads guilty to trafficking black market kidneys to N.J. residents,

Jerry

Brooklyn man pleads guilty to trafficking black market kidneys to N.J. residents:

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/10/man_pleads_guilty_in_human_org.html

How does Larry feel about having predicted organlegging?

Ed

Ay yi yi yi, in China they do it for chili

Of course there is the question as to which clause in the Constitution makes this a federal matter? Why should I not have the right to sell my organs? But assume that it’s your business, it’s a matter for the states, not the feds.

clip_image002[8]

Cockpit tour of the Dreamliner

The new Dreamliner’s cockpit looks quite plush and fancy. I like the

cushy seats, but didn’t see anywhere to hang the fuzzy dice safely.

http://www.wired.com/autopia/2011/10/cockpit-tour-of-all-nippon-airways-boeing-787-dreamliner/

–Gary P.

The Midwest from the ISS, including the Aurora

Jerry,

Here is a nice picture from the ISS. I rather like it since my stomping grounds are in the shote.

Regards, Charles Adams, Bellevue, NE

<http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=76201>

"….This astronaut photograph highlights the Chicago metropolitan area as the largest cluster of lights, next to the dark patch of Lake Michigan. The other largest metropolitan areas include St. Louis, Minneapolis-St. Paul, and the Omaha-Council Bluffs region on the Nebraska-Iowa border. The northeastern seaboard lies just beyond the Appalachian Mountains, a dark winding zone without major cities….

….In addition to the major metropolitan areas, the rectangular north-south-east-west layout of townships is clearly visible in the rural, lower left of the image. This pattern instantly gives the sense of north orientation (toward the top left corner) and is a distinctive characteristic of the United States that helps astronauts quickly know which continent they are flying over at night…."

clip_image002[9]

Old College Professors

Your recent mention of a teacher’s remark about that Buck Rogers stuff and remembering it many years later reminded me of something one of my college professor said after I gave a speech about orbiting space stations in 1952. Mine didn’t quite turn out that way. Not long after, I dropped out of college to become an Aviation Cadet and enter pilot training. After finishing my five year tour in the AF, I took a job writing Pilot’s Handbooks at McDonnell Aircraft.

Von Braun was one of the principle authors of a small book titled Space Medicine. I used it as the basis for one of my talks in public speaking class at Virginia Tech. The title of my speech was One Thousand Miles Up and was about orbiting space stations. After the talk, the Professor remarked that it was an interesting speech but he didn’t expect to see it in our lifetime. Eight years later I finished my job as writer of the Project Mercury Astronauts Handbook and returned to Virginia Tech to finish my last two years of college. I looked up my old Professor and ask if he remembered my speech. He laughed and said no, but that was what he would have said in 1952.

Chuck Anderson

clip_image002[10]

Re: Government Economic Stimulus Analogous to Bloodletting

Jerry,

Iain Murray, in a letter to the editor at American Spectator, writes that the government economic stimulus programs are quackery as medical bloodletting was. He also advocates for the replacement of GDP – Gross Domestic Product – with GPP – Gross Private Product. GPP would exclude government mandated transactions (he cites the purchase of ethanol in fuel), instead including only those presumably entered into freely.

While GPP might be an imperfect measure it probably is more relevant that GDP. More importantly, he points out that the practice of bloodletting continued well beyond when it was discovered to be misguided, just as has Keynesian’s view of economic stimulus.

http://spectator.org/archives/2011/10/25/stimulus-delusion

Regards,

George

Sounds about right.

clip_image003

An excellent article by Victor Davis Hansen:

http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/rage-on-and-on-and-on/?singlepage=true

Of course, you could have written it almost verbatim.

Phil

Hansen and I often are in agreement.

clip_image002[11]

Strange Hollows Discovered on Mercury – NASA Science,

Jerry

Strange Hollows Discovered on Mercury:

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/24oct_sleepyhollows/

Just amazing what new stuff pops up when you go out and just look.

Ed

I have no idea what to make of this, but it’s intriguing. Perhaps as a story idea…

clip_image002[12]

clip_image005

clip_image002[13]

What ails America; exponentials

 

View 698 Friday, October 28, 2011

clip_image003_thumb

The financial news is simple: Europe will bail out Greece, and count on Greece to bail out Europe. Everyone basically bails water out of another country into their own, trusting that their “partners” like the Greek public service workers, will do their share and a bit more, and all will be safe together. The record doesn’t show that happening, but this time for sure.

Meanwhile we are told that the remedy to the Depression here in the United States is more public service employees whose average salary is above the national average. The median annual income in the United States is about $50,000 per household. The average wage of Federal public service workers is about $50,000 a year; of the average state worker about $48,000; of the average private sector worker about $45,000. Note that these are salaries and benefits for individuals, which argues that the $50,000 household income is an underestimate, but perhaps not given the unemployment rate and the different information gathering techniques. Below about $50,000 a year household income medians tend to be about equal to wage medians; the simplest way to raise household income is to add wage earners to the household. Of course that often leads to increases in the number in the household and the reduction of the number of wage earners.

Note that the emphasis is always on raising taxes and spending more, not on cutting the ever-growing spending and debt. Only there is no one ready to bail out our boats, and many of those around the world are bailing theirs into the US boat, if I may be permitted a metaphor.

clip_image003_thumb

 

There are those who resent my using metaphors and analogues.

"Exponential"

It is not "Exponential" Get out your old Algebra I text.

Dan

Dan Richie

I have several letters protesting that the growth of US spending and debt is “not exponential.” Depends I suppose on what you call exponential. Not, it’s not a smooth exponential curve. It has fits and starts. Both debt and spending are monotonically rising (with a small glitch in the monotonic rise of debt during the Clinton/Gingrich years), there’s an exponential rise in spending built into the function used by the Congressional Budget Office to evaluate budgets in terms of cuts (any appropriation that does not increase the budget is counted as a cut; a continuation budget that merely spends as much this year as last is reported by the media as a drastic cut); and the best approximation of US budget spending over any reasonably lengthy period is an exponential. And I don’t feel like saying all that each time I mention the exponential spending built in to any “deficit reduction” plan that does not involve real cuts in spending.

At the moment the best descriptor of both US spending and debt is a monotonic rise. It may flutter here and there but over time it’s an exponential in which each year’s spending is based on 100% plus a percentage of last year’s. Strictly speaking the economic growth of the US is not an exact function of e^x. The more general form cb^x gives a better approximation, but that isn’t exact either. I suppose these gotcha games are fun for some.

clip_image003_thumb

I often find Peggy Noonan’s weekly essays worth my time. This one is particularly astute.

The Divider vs. the Thinker

While Obama readies an ugly campaign, Paul Ryan gives a serious account of what ails America.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203554104577002262150454258.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop

What ails America is that we spend too much money and we have made the central government not merely powerful, but ubiquitous. We are constructing the kind of Permit Raj that India inherited and took generations to shed after independence. Still hasn’t shed it.

The answer to the Depression is freedom. Freedom will lead to development of energy resources which will lead to cheaper energy, which will grow the economy. Meanwhile we have to stop spending money we do not have in order to accomplish things we cannot afford.

It’s actually pretty simple, but there is an enormous establishment that likes things as they are.

clip_image003_thumb

clip_image005_thumb

clip_image0031_thumb