Iowa and vindictiveness; Harry Erwin, RIP

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

View 708 Wednesday, January 04, 2012

The Iowa Caucuses

Harry Erwin, Ph.D., RIP

clip_image002

I have discussed this at length in the past. I do not withdraw that opinion.

Conservatives are not anarchists.

Another consequence of the Iowa Caucuses is unfortunate: as of now Mr. Gingrich, stung by the ugly anti-Gingrich ads paid for by the Romney PACS, seems to have revised his goal: from running for President, he has now become an instrument of vengeance against Romney. This is worse than unfortunate, and I wish he’d stop that. It will do neither him nor the Republic much good. Newt’s change of objectives may be responsible for Parry’s reconsidering his run: if Newt will pound on Romney, there is room for another Not-Romney, even though Parry got fewer Iowa votes than Newt.

Newt can certainly damage Romney, and indeed Romney’s acceptance of McCain’s endorsement moves Romney further into the clutches of the Establishment Republicans and the originators of the notion of “Big Government Conservative” schemes. That has to be good for Santorum, who surely sees that Ron Paul wasn’t that distant a third in this election. Santorum is now the leading Not-Romney. And the beat goes on.

I remain of the opinion I have had for weeks, and which Newt publicly espoused until last night: the election is vital, and the nation deserves better than Obama; and all of the viable Republican candidates are to be preferred to the current President. We can’t take four more years of this.

It’s a long time until November.

clip_image003

http://world.std.com/~herwin/

http://www.sunderland.ac.uk/beacon-di/staffprofiles/drharryerwin/

clip_image002[1]

clip_image002[11]

clip_image002[12]

clip_image005

clip_image002[13]

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.