Vitamins, warming, credentials, distance learning, and other important matters.

Mail 735 Monday, July 30, 2012

On Vitamins

I just discovered that the metformin I’m taking for insulin resistance depletes my supply of B12 and folic acid, and interferes with calcium! The calcium shouldn’t be an issue because I consume dairy products out the wazoo, but no WONDER the B complex has been helping!

-Stephanie

Folic Acid

The problem with folic acid is that the body does not use folic acid, it uses the l-methylfolate found in fresh food. Folic acid has to be converted to l-methylfolate before the body can use it, and the process of conversion can be reduced by several factors. Aging, the MTHFR gene defect, and low levels of the required B vitamins can all reduce the amount of folic acid that is converted.

This is bad because if you are not converting enough folic acid, not only do you suffer from low levels of l-methylfolate, you also suffer from the build up of folic acid.

Anyway, all of this is new science. I only know about it because it turned up in the raw data on my 23andMe genetic report. It is a very common defect. I have it, my husband has it, and 40% of the population has it. I have had very good results with switching to l-methlfolate. I strongly believe that it is the way to go.

cynthia allingham

As I have said, I know of one case in which folate deficiency in a young woman taking more than the government recommended amounts at the time she conceived had really severe effects on the child at birth. I have been unwilling to trust the government’s recommendations since that time (they have since been revised up, but the damage was very real and no apology was ever issued). Oops. But they’re from the government and their intentions were good.

clip_image002

Global Warming implies two things…

Jerry:

Interesting piece suggesting skepticism might be more appropriate than credulousness in re Global Warming. I’ve always thought that "Global Warming" should at least require two things: 1) Warming, and 2) Global effect.

Alas, here in Central Florida we are noticing a sustained cooling trend over the last 30 years (I lived here first in 1979). Where we used to be able to grow virtually anything without regard to "cold hardiness", we now find that winters routinely bring us occasional temperatures below freezing — even in the 20s! Fortunately, such temperatures don’t last long, but they do occur every year — and more than once — whereas decades ago a "hard freeze" (i.e., temps below 28) meant a "historic" cold winter.

In fact, the climate trend here can be encapsulated in a simple question: "How many commercial orange growers are there in "Orange" County, FL?" Answer: "NONE any more." That’s right — the county named after the fact that it was once virtually wall-to-wall orange groves now has none still in commercial production. The reason? Growers — who 30 years ago only had to resort to burning "pitch-pots" perhaps one night during a freak cold wave once every few years when the jet stream dipped unusually low and drove cold Canadian air into the area — slowly moved southward as the winters became more cold more often and it became impossible to keep fruit from freezing by any man-made means.

So how is it Global Warming if it is not warming globally?

Gary Cordelli

I still do not know how to take the temperature of Florida, much less compare it to a temperature of some years ago; but the need for smudge pots/acre for a year ought to be documented back quite a few years. I wonder if the climate people have looked at that.

clip_image003

Olympic trivia.

Dr. Pournelle,

I agree completely with your words about the execrable Olympic announcers. A rational television network covering the Olympics would leave the announcers at home–they add nothing and simply boost the taurocoprolite level. (The words based upon your new construction need to be in the Oxford English Dictionary–soonest! So should "congresscritter," which I find myself using with increasing frequency.)

At the opening, there was a boy soprano of remarkable skill singing "Jerusalem"–when he finished the solo and the choir began singing, the announcer (Meredith Viera, I believe) broke in with a discussion about the use of ‘culturally significant’ choirs. Might have been an interesting piece of trivia, but the timing was terrible.

This was infuriating for two reasons: I was listening to the choir, and her comments literally drowned them out; the other reason being the fact that "Jerusalem" is held in about the same esteem in Britain as "My Country, ‘Tis of thee" or "God Bless America" and no British announcer would have been so crass as to comment during a worldwide performance of those songs. There should be two audio channels–one for the actual event and the idiot announcers, one that’s full audio but has no verbal comments.

Give me an announcer-free Olympics. I can make my own ignorant comments and think my own trivial thoughts. And I know better than to yammer during "Jerusalem."

jomath

Hi Jerry

I just wanted to correct a couple of small errors that crept into your comments on the Olympics.

Firstly, no troops were brought back from overseas to man the Olympics – some did have leave cancelled though.

The parade of athletes was sped up because they have previously taken an age – not for ads – we don’t have them on the BBC. If you meant just on NBC then I beg your pardon.

On another point, Romney was rude when a guest – I don’t put up with that from guests and I guess you and Roberta don’t either.

Finally, I would like to log my admiration at the invention

(re-discovery?) of taurocoprophogeny – meretricious, if unworthy, of you.

Kind Regards

Kevin Crisp

My paper reported it as troops called back from the Afghan war; thanks for the correction. My paper also had a column by someone who watched the parade on BBC without commercials and was then horrified to see what NBC showed in the US.

We have to disagree about rudeness. Given what actually has happened so far, Mr. Romney was no more than truthful: stuff happens, and those in charge are often surprised. He carefully included himself among those not prepared for everything. I do not think it rude not to engage in fulsome praise. Perhaps it would have been better manners if Mr. Romney had simply dodged the question, but you may be sure he would then have been castigated for his cowardly behavior.

olympics coverage rant

Jerry,

For the second or third Olympics in a row, the tv coverage of the Olympics has been horrible. I’m not talking about event selection or schedule, I’m talking about technical details of recording video in one place and playing it back in another.

I was watching the coverage on NBC last night and it was absolutely terrible from a technical perspective. Every 3-5 minutes the video would cut out, back up or speed forward a few seconds, and re-start. Audio would un-sync from video. In three cases, they cut to commercial after a gymnastics performance but before the scores were given, and not cover the score, even briefly, after the commercials were over.

NBC paid millions for the right to be the exclusive channel outlet for Olympics coverage, and they can’t even get the basics correct. My elementary school news channel was run better by a couple of chatty 5th graders.

And of course my other rant is about the seating scandal…

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/olympics/london-2012/9434744/London-2012-Olympics-Empty-seats-on-the-opening-day-prompts-investigation.html

Hundreds (thousands?) of seats and tickets were given to media outlets and corporate sponsors, who failed to use them. So thousands of seats are going empty in some of the most popular and sold out events. I think the event organizers should immediately pass a new rule stating that if a corporate or media venue ticket goes unused, that organization loses their seat for the remainder of the Olympics and the seat tickets can be re-sold at the venue box-office. There are a few million people who would give a body part to be able to attend, so if the seats are empty the tickets should be forfeit, period.

Empty seats at the Olympics are a crime… This is a big deal to a lot of people and anyone who cares about it so little as to not use huge blocks of tickets while thousands wait outside should simply not be pandered to.

Sean

clip_image002[1]

Quoth Richard Muller, noted skeptic of catastrophic anthropogenic climate change (nee ‘global warming’).

Hello Jerry,

In view of of your commentary today ("That seems an appropriate setting for thinking about global warming and the surprise defection of Muller from the ranks of the Deniers, accompanied by the cheers of his compadres at Berkeley."), I thought you may be interested in this. It is not from me, but from one of Dr. Judith Curry’s readers, ‘pokerguy’:

“pokerguy | July 29, 2012 at 7:18 am | Reply

Yay. Countdown to Anthony. First thing I thought of when I woke up this morning. I need therapy.

As to Muller’s NYT’s “Amazing Grace” piece (I once was blind but now I see), here’s a comment by poptech on Bishop Hill:

The Truth about Richard Muller

http://www.populartechnology.net/2012/06/truth-about-richard-muller.html <http://www.populartechnology.net/2012/06/truth-about-richard-muller.html>

“I was never a skeptic” – Richard Muller, 2011

“If Al Gore reaches more people and convinces the world that global warming is real, even if he does it through exaggeration and distortion – which he does, but he’s very effective at it – then let him fly any plane he wants.” – Richard Muller, 2008

“There is a consensus that global warming is real. …it’s going to get much, much worse.” – Richard Muller, 2006

“Let me be clear. My own reading of the literature and study of paleoclimate suggests strongly that carbon dioxide from burning of fossil fuels will prove to be the greatest pollutant of human history. It is likely to have severe and detrimental effects on global climate.” – Richard Muller, 2003″

As for the ‘Opening Ceremonies’, "You’re a better man than I am, Gunga Din." I would have watched them under the direct supervision of a SWAT team, IF they had a notarized court order authorizing them to use deadly force to ENSURE that I did. Maybe.

Bob Ludwick

Clearly many are better informed about Mr. Muller than I am. I don’t remember ever hearing of him before although I may actually have met him.

clip_image003[1]

The Chick-Fil-A distraction

Dear Dr. Pournelle,

I think this guy hits the nail on the head.

http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/07/most-important-legacy-of-obamas-gay-marriage-switch-was-freeing-dems-to-play-the-bigot-card/#comments

It’s a distraction. The administration know it can’t run on it’s record so they’re playing the bigot card. Which they couldn’t do so long as President Obama still opposed gay marriage. Once he flipped, they were free to unleash vicious assaults —

— vicious assaults which have no teeth. They can’t withhold business licenses without violating the first amendment, and there’s no pending legislation on gay marriage either to sign or to veto. There’s almost been a truce in the culture war for four years as everyone’s been trying to get the economy back on track.

It appears the the administration has given up on that tack and figures they can win by throwing red meat to their base — red meat which has no effect save to rile up the rubes in the cheap seats, get them marching down to the polls and donating and volunteering. Certainly Obama’s donations recently haven’t been all they would hope for.

http://www.examiner.com/article/large-donations-for-obama-are-down

Since President Obama has lost his ability to charm, he now depends on demonizing Romney as much as he possibly can. Ironic that the President who ran on "Hope and Change" and on uniting different sections of the country is in fact running one of the most divisive campaigns I can remember. Maybe Johnson vs. Goldwater was this rough, but I’m hard pressed to think of any other democrat in living memory who waged social war with this level of vigor.

Respectfully,

Brian P.

I always thought it a distraction and I have paid little attention to it. I expect there are many CEO’s of companies I buy from who hold views I detest. There are others who say things I agree with. I am told that Henry Ford was an unpleasant man with some very regrettable views, but his cars were pretty good stuff.

clip_image002[2]

‘RAND looked at 588 air-to-air shoot-downs since the 1950s and counted just 24 that occurred with the attacker firing from beyond visual range. Historically, American long-range air-to-air missiles have been 90-percent less effective than predicted, RAND asserted.’

<http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/07/f-22-germans/>

Roland Dobbins

We did operations studies like that when I was in the business, and I am not entirely surprised. Of course when we were doing those studies in the 1960’s there were fewer cases of shoot downs after WW II, and most of our data came from WW II and Korea.

clip_image002[3]

Subject: City shuts down teen’s hot dog stand

Here’s a story when a thirteen year old young man took initiative to help his disabled parents, and the government couldn’t hardly wait to shut him down.

But…a business stepped and not only made it right, but better.

There’s a lesson for the big government advocates here somewhere….

http://www.hlntv.com/video/2012/07/27/city-shuts-down-teen-hot-dog-stand?hpt=hp_bn15

Tracy

Astonishing.

clip_image002[4]

Education Without Schools

Jerry,

I have had personal experience with early "distance learning" technology. When I was in high school in the 70’s, I took a calculus class offered to seniors who had taken all other math classes offered in the school. The school did not have a teacher qualified to teach calculus, however, and the course was provided on open real video tape. The teacher assigned as our "advisor" was not interested in answering questions or clarifying points in the presentation and neither were the tapes — no matter how many times we rewound and re-played the tapes, they said the same thing in the same way! (Amazing, isn’t it?). To make a long story short, I was determined to learn calculus, so I started collecting calculus text books, looking for different explanations of the then obscure points in the video lectures. Eventually I had twelve books. The trick worked; I learned calculus and I explained to the rest of the class what I learned as I learned it.

Distance learning is not the same today as it once was. I have enrolled my son (whom you met at Liberty Con) in a home school curriculum for high school as I have lost all faith in the public school system. He will receive live lectures on his computer with question/answer sessions as well as the ability to review the lectures at will as recordings with supplemental material linked in. He will also have the benefit of live instruction from my wife and myself, both of college level education — she in the arts and myself in engineering and the sciences. I know he will receive four times the education that the public high school could provide and likely in half the time.

Kevin L. Keegan

Well of course it is not the same, just as I am not operating with a Z-80 and a screen that gives 24 lines of text and text only.

Kahn Academy has shown that introductory calculus can be taught by a computer lecture. I doubt yours was better than his.

And yes not everyone will get it from Kahn’s lecture just as not everyone got it from Calculus Made Easy; but should the entire middle class be saddled with lifelong debt because some don’t learn from on screen lectures?

The system has become monstrous, and I do not think it can be fixed. More, there will be more movements to force people to send their children to credentialed schools. The unions will never give up this income stream. The harm to the next generation is monstrous, but My God How The Money Rolls in.

Coursera seems to be trying to address increasing interaction during online learning. I learned about them reading an article in the paper about your alma mater joining there program.

coursera.org

I am sure they or someone like them are working on the accreditation anlge.

tonyb

clip_image002[5]

PETA takes ‘bets’ on when senator will die after objection to USDA vegetarian push

Both this and the Chick-Fil-A issue show just how much the liberals venom and hate they can generate against anyone they disagree with, even over a small matter. The odd thing is that they don’t even notice the hypocrisy of it, despite all their claims of being intellectuals.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals has started taking "bets" on its website over when Sen. Charles Grassley will die, after the Iowa Republican scolded the Department of Agriculture for advocating a vegetarian diet.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/27/peta-takes-bets-on-when-senator-will-die-after-objection-to-usda-vegetarian/?test=latestnews#ixzz21qOXTAu4 <http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/27/peta-takes-bets-on-when-senator-will-die-after-objection-to-usda-vegetarian/?test=latestnews#ixzz21qOXTAu4>

clip_image002[6]

Education Credentials

Dear Jerry,

>>We need a way to provide credentials to the qualified and otherwise get out of the way.<<

The primary reason a Credential is even wanted is to satisfy archaic state occupational licensing laws and regulations. This is where the Government-Education Complex enforces its monopoly. Part of the licensing requirement is invariably displaying a Credential from an "accredited" learning institution. The theory is that possession of this Credential is evidence of minimal competency in the referenced subject matter for engineers, lawyers and barbers. Sometimes this theory intersects reality.

This political field of licensing is where change needs to be focused. If Mike Johns and others feel the need for a high cost traditional college education they should certainly be able to get (and pay) for it. But that does not justify inflicting the extremely high costs of the educational cartel on others who do not need their services, or for depriving yet others of opportunity simply because they don’t have a certain quantity of Federal Reserve currency to hand over to accredited rent-seekers.

The short solution is provide fee-based subject matter testing and open these tests to all comers. The current College Board CLEP test structure shows what reasonable test fees are.

Professional bodies are playing an obstructive role. ABET for instance http://www.abet.org/ is the cartel enforcer for "applied science, computing, engineering, and technology programs". Its principle power derives from the fact that state occupational licensing boards typically require an ABET accredited degree or evaluated equivalent to even apply for engineering and other technology occupation licensing.

The various engineering specialties are excellent candidates for standardized bar exam style processes. My own expectation is this would turn into a Warren Buffet type low tide swimming event whereby we discover who is skinny dipping. In other words, numerous expensive "accredited" schools would be discovered to be accrediting graduates with deficient knowledge in their nominal degree fields.

And speaking of bar exams, the bar exams and law licenses should also be RE-opened to anyone willing to pay the licensing fees and able to pass the tests. Is there any reason Law shouldn’t revive a master-apprentice style of training? That is, any reason other than the desire of the Harvard and Yale law school faculties to collect high salaries and wield unchecked ideological power? I have heard that even Yale Law School grads like Hillary Rodham Clinton have needed two or three swings to pass their bar exams.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_life_and_career_of_Abraham_Lincoln#Politics_and_the_law

"In March 1836 Lincoln took the first step to becoming a practicing attorney when he applied to the clerk of the Sangamon County Court to have himself registered as a man of good and moral character. After passing an oral examination by a panel of practicing attorneys Lincoln received his law license on September 9, 1836 and in April 1837 he was enrolled to practice before the Supreme Court of Illinois."

Missing from this account is any mention that Lincoln ever attended an "accredited law school", let alone received a J.D. or Ll.d.

Best Wishes,

Mark

One reason for credentials is to avoid lawsuits under affirmative action and Americans with Disabilities Act and other egalitarian regulations and laws. Insisting on credentials gets the personnel manager off the hook for a number of cases. Of course it also make their job much harder.

Repeal a lot of the ‘discrimination’ regulations and you will see in general more people hired on the basis of ability and fewer on credentials. Or that’s my opinion.

clip_image002[7]

Vitamins and other stuff

Jerry,

For what it’s worth, here’s my two cents on the vitamin issue. Note that much of this depends on conversations (from the mid-1990s) with the late Mike Lalor, and on some conversations with my current physician.

Pursuant to bone spurs, I have taken 400 – 800 IU of ergocalciferol (Vitamin D-2, described as the water soluble vitamin of the D-complex) as protection against bone spurs. Anecdotally I can report that pain medically diagnosed as a bone spur (which would require surgical intervention in the form of "scraping the bone") goes away when I take at least 400 IU daily and returns if I miss doses for something less than a week. However, this dosage has NOT been adequate in maintaining my serum level of Vitamin D as measured by blood testing, and the doctor has placed me on additional supplements of Vitamin D-3.

On Lalor’s advice I started the following regimen for varicose veins, which I have been plagued with for most of my adult life:

Vitamin C, 1000 – 2000 mg daily, primarily as an anti-coagulant Vitamin E, 400 – 800 IU daily in the form of "natural mixed tocopherol" (NOT the alpha-tocopherol of most Vitamin E supplements) as an anti-oxidant and natural lubricant of the cardiovascular system.

Niacin , 100 – 200 mg daily, as a vasodilator. For this to work, one cannot use the no-flush variety, but one adapts.

The supplements biorutin (500 – 1000 mg daily) and butcher’s broom (1-2 standard tablets) today, which together supposedly provide fuel to stimulate rebuilding the cardiovascular system.

I can report that my veins got worse when I ignored this regimen for a year or so, and that after restarting it at the higher dose, not only do I have fewer instances of leg pain, but the doctor has observed some signs of minor improvement in vein surface visibility (in connection with use of prescription Joust support hose, which costs a lot more than the vitamins do). Vein pain seems to recur consistently if I miss two-three doses in a five-day period.

I also take occasional doses of L-carnitine, which enhances fat metabolism (including, supposedly, the disintegration of plaque deposits in the circulatory system — Lalor reported that megadoses can actually cause the breakup of such deposits in life-threatening form. Whether due to this and the varicose vein regimen or not, I can report that as of my last stress test and test for blockages about four years ago, I had no evidence of same despite my… er, overweight condition (which you noted at Libertycon). I am presently taking one 250-mg tablet per week.

Finally, I take a "balanced B-100" (or two balanced b-50) tablets per day for general energy.

(I’ll also note, however, that I’m on two blood pressure medications and two oral diabetic medications, among other prescriptions for other problems.)

That said, I approach other supplements very carefully after attempting glucosamine- chondroitin in the mid 1990’s. The recommended regimen was five tablets per day; I started at 1 tablet per day and after three days was in severe pain. I chose to drop it completely rather than restarting at the higher dose for obvious reasons.

As always, your mileage may vary. I can only report my anecdotal experience.

Jim

I do not currently take glucosamine-condroitin, but I have done so; I didn’t notice much effect one way or another. I do take a B-100 tablet, generally daily, along with my other witch’s brew.

clip_image003[2]

Jerry,

From time to time you mention actions by the federal government that make it especially difficult for companies like Gibson Guitar to stay in business, and draconian punishments for pet rabbit breeders who sell 600 rabbits instead of the 500 that they are allowed. I understand that the penalty for this particular infraction is a fine of $100,000 rising to $2,000,000 if the fine is not paid promptly. All without the scrutiny of the courts. In the larger scheme of things this is not important. Perfectly good guitars can be imported from China, and no one will really suffer if they are unable to to obtain a pet rabbit. More serious, if true, is the jail sentence of eight years imposed for the crime of importing lobster tails from Honduras in plastic boxes as opposed to cardboard boxes as mandated by the Honduras Government. Again, this is horrific for the imprisoned importer, but not significant in the greater scheme of things.

What is nationally vital is the deterrent effect that these examples have on would be entrepreneurs. There are many reasons for someone who thinks he sees a gap in the market that he can fill to not do so. For the government to add further reasons is not rational, indeed it is clinically insane. The USA has an annual budget deficit of about $15 trillion and unfunded liabilities, eg. pension liabilities, currently estimated at $119 trillion. If these prodigious debts are ever to be repaid, innovators are needed as never before.

Your correspondent’s father rather unwisely toured France and Germany in 1939 in a Fiat 500* car, quite large enough for himself and his pregnant wife. He ended up driving flat out for Calais accompanied by three Brits that he met on the way. For his own part your correspondent would love to visit the USA and spend two or three months just driving about. Starting in New York and ending in Los Angeles before flying the Pacific to see Australasia. The current atmosphere of fascism in the USA has altered his plans. The USA has convinced him that it is a place avoided by the prudent. This is sad to the point of disgust. How did the World’s exemplar of freedom fall, so far, so quickly?

John Edwards.

* The Fiat 500 was large enough for two adults. It also had reasonable space in the back for two legless dwarves who were inured to suffering. How papa fitted three extra adults in the car is a mystery. Possibly the prospect of being a guest of Herr Hitler helped.

We are from the government and we are here to help you.

clip_image002[8]

“It’s practically possible for a medium-technical savvy person to mount an attack and impersonate a plane that’s not there.”

<http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2012/07/25/next-gen-air-traffic-control-vulnerable-to-hackers-spoofing-planes-out-of-thin-air/>

Roland Dobbins

clip_image002[9]

Neanderthal-type species once roamed Africa, DNA shows,

Jerry

Neanderthal-type species once roamed Africa and interbred with Africans 20-50K ya, after a number of our ancestors had already left and begun to colonize Asia and Europe:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/early-africans-mated-with-mystery-species-of-humans/2012/07/26/gJQAxFzZBX_story.html

“How do you risch?”

Ed

Rishithra—

clip_image002[10]

This is a suprise; audits of the Federal Reserve are supposed to occur annually, but this has not happened since Eisenhower was president.  Every year, Ron Paul introduces certain bills with the purposes of doing what the Consitution and U.S. laws already require and nobody ever votes for these bills.  Auditing the Federal Reserve is one of those bills.  This year, the audit passed!

<.>

In a move that serves as a capstone to Rep. Ron Paul’s colorful career, the House on Wednesday voted to have Congress‘ chief investigators conduct a full audit of the Federal Reserve’s shrouded decision-making process.

The overwhelming 327-98 vote sends the measure to the Senate, where Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, at one time expressed support for an audit — though he reportedly has changed his mind.

</>

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jul/25/house-passes-ron-pauls-audit-fed-bill/

What is not surprising is the lack of Senate support for this audit.  After all, it’s easier to buy a majority among 100 politicians than it is to buy a majority among 435 politicians. 

More interesting; not suprisng if you keep up on these matters:

<.>

Fed officials have long fought the audit bill, arguing it would compromise their independence. Chairman Ben Bernanke told House lawmakers last week it would open the door to a "nightmare scenario" of political meddling in monetary policy decisions.

</>

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/25/us-usa-fed-audit-idUSBRE86O1IX20120725

Why is that Mister Chairman?  What are you doing at the Federal Reserve that you don’t want the people to see?  And, a nightmare for whom, exactly?  Would it be a nightmare for you, past chairmen, past treasurers — to name a few? 

—–

Most Respectfully,

Joshua Jordan, KSC

Percussa Resurgo

clip_image002[11]

clip_image005

clip_image002[12]

Olympic Taurocoprolites; Global Warming pretenders; and other matters.

View 735 Monday, July 30, 2012

clip_image002

I watched the London Olympics Opening Ceremony Friday night, and Saturday I got involved in other stuff. Saturday evening we went to see Brave, and we watched a lot of Olympics stuff Sunday, so in effect I took the weekend off.

I didn’t really want to comment on the Opening Ceremonies because what I would have had to say would be impolite. I’ve thought about it since, and I guess I don’t care. If the Brits can insult Mr. Romney for being both polite and honest when asked if Britain was “ready” for the Olympics – this just after they had to withdraw troops from Afghanistan because they suddenly noted a deficiency in their security arrangements – then I guess being polite isn’t in the cards.

The Opening Ceremony was four hours of the most pretentious taurocoprophogeny I have seen this year. It began with the picture of an idyllic countryside that depicted a nostalgia for a Malthusian existence for 90% of the human race, and went on from there. It included a great Shakespearian actor given about four lines of Shakespeare and dozens of skits in a goofy costume with cigar, interspersed with clever scenes involving the Queen, a paean to National Health Care and socialized medicine, and NBC commenters who made sure that no part of the ceremony was unaccompanied by mindless chatter. Parts of it were amusing, but none of them had much to do with athletic excellence. Mary Poppins vs. Valdemort was funny for a few minutes, and would have been more so if the NBC commenters hadn’t felt the need to explain the matters.

Finally came the parade of the nations, interspersed with the usual horror of stacked commercials which required that the actual events be truncated and hurried along so that there would be more time for advertisements.

After the Berlin Olympics the Games became national contests rather than exhibitions of individual prowess, a tendency exaggerated by the Cold War following WW II. The Los Angeles Olympics tried to reverse some of that trend but it was too late. We now have the idiocy of the gymnastics world champion not being allowed to compete in the individual events because – well because no ‘nation’ can send more than two competitors to an individual contest? I am sure I must be misunderstanding that rule, which seems to take the notion of affirmative action to an absurdity. Such is our modern world.

clip_image002[1]

Roberta tells me it will be 100 degrees out there shortly and we have to take our morning walk. That seems an appropriate setting for thinking about global warming and the surprise defection of Muller from the ranks of the Deniers, accompanied by the cheers of his compadres at Berkeley.

I haven’t read his (unpublished but peer reviewed, but now said to be on line) papers yet, but the summaries I have seen says that he is now convinced that the world has been warming since 1800, and he can’t think of any reason for that other than human action; and he has a new computer model.

I can’t think of anyone who doesn’t know that the Hudson froze solid in 1776 and continued to do so into the 1800’s, the Thames had markets on the ice up into the 1830’s, the brackish canals of Holland froze solid enough for skating well into late Spring well into the 1800’s. And Arrhenius did back of the envelope calculations – ah well.

I will think on the matter and look at the papers, but I can’t see what Muller knows now than we didn’t all know many years ago. Perhaps he will convince me, but I keep remembering vines in Vinland and dairy farms in Greenland, which I learned about in 5th Grade. Perhaps before.

Back after our walk.

clip_image002[2]

Latch on, New York City!!

clip_image003

NBC appears to be using the airlines and newspapers as role models.  Airlines and newspapers seem to have learned their business philosophy from Chinese merchants: once you have made a sale, gradually reduce the quality of what you deliver until the customer threatens to leave, then go back to giving him the minimum quality that he can still stand.

Newspapers are still reducing their quality, and still losing customers. I already need brighter lights in my breakfast room. NBC is streaming the Americans playing basketball, but their live coverage is some people bicycling. I presume they are racing, but it’s hard to tell.

And the world champion gymnast won’t be allowed to compete in the individual gymnastics because she came in third among Americans, and we are spreading the wealth around: only two competitors per country. This in an event that is said to be related to the original Olympic Games, and supposedly promote individualism as opposed to nationalism – at least that is what they were supposed to be doing when I was growing up. Mr. Hitler tried to make the Games a nationalistic and racial contest, but Jesse Owens did not agree. The Olympic rules forbade ‘professional’ athletes, to the extent that Jim Thorpe’s medals were taken away from him when it was discovered he had played professional baseball before winning the gold) but the problem was that military athletes given the duty of training were permitted. Eventually those rules were abolished, and the Games became even more of a national contest. And now the silly rules say that someone who scores well below world champion Jordyn Wieber can compete, but she can’t. This is stupidity on broken stilts, but it’s good affirmative action I suppose.

 

clip_image003

Of course Mitt Romney was correct. The Brits were not entirely prepared for all this. It was pretty obvious to everyone, but the news media will use any stick to beat him with.

Romney has now in essence said that the US will not only recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel (and thus reject Mr. Obama’s suggestion that the Arab-Israeli negotiations begin with the 1967 boundaries (before Israel’s victories in the 6-day and other wars). Sheldon Adelson was in the audience, and is raising money for Romney. There are a number of implications to this. One is that Romney and Newt Gingrich have a powerful mutual friend. What that means for Newt in the event of a Romney election is not clear, but it may indicate a larger place in space policy for Newt Gingrich – who remains a space cadet. I first met Newt after he read my A Step Farther Out (Kindle edition) and telephoned me because he wanted to discuss it.

Sheldon Adelson is a very astute man, and his ability to put together coalitions of enemies in order to advance causes and institutions he favors should not be underestimated. His wife, Dr. Miriam Ochshorn Adelson, is a graduate of Tel Aviv University.

 

clip_image003

And Mike Flynn, who knows more statistics than anyone I have ever known well other than John Tukey, has this comment:

Muller and BEST

A comment on Dr. Briggs’ "Statistician to the Stars" blog provides the following comments from Dr. Muller of the BEST study:

“I was never a skeptic” – Richard Muller, 2011 “If Al Gore reaches more people and convinces the world that global warming is real, even if he does it through exaggeration and distortion – which he does, but he’s very effective at it – then let him fly any plane he wants.” – Richard Muller, 2008 “There is a consensus that global warming is real. …it’s going to get much, much worse.” – Richard Muller, 2006 “Let me be clear. My own reading of the literature and study of paleoclimate suggests strongly that carbon dioxide from burning of fossil fuels will prove to be the greatest pollutant of human history. It is likely to have severe and detrimental effects on global climate.” – Richard Muller, 2003″

Given these sentiments running back to AD 2003, it seems a bit disingenuous to advertise as a "denier" who has been "converted" by close study of the data. If you go to http://wmbriggs.com/blog/?p=5946 and search the site for "Muller" a number of interesting statistical critiques will reveal themselves.

The problem, as always, is in the homogenization procedures. Such procedures are necessary if one is to convert actual temperature measurements into adjusted measurements that "might have been seen" if only there were not a city where once there were meadows as bucolic as the opening act at the Olympics (or conversely, if the city had always been there). This is a bit like measuring a triangular plot of land and finding that the angles do not add up to 180 deg. The data must be adjusted. The question is how. By some amazing coincidence, in 67% of the cases, the adjusted data show a greater temperature increase than the actual data. In some cases, a declining trend in actual temperatures is, mirabile dictu, transformed into an increasing trend in adjusted temperatures. But given the homogenization procedures used, a stationary series of serially correlated random data will be adjusted into an increasing trend. http://itia.ntua.gr/getfile/1212/1/documents/2012EGU_homogenization_1.pdf

MikeF

Apparently Muller wasn’t quite the Denier that the headlines said he was. As to the homogenization, I have written on that many times: I don’t trust any of the measures enough that I would bet trillions of dollars on them. We know it was warmer in Roman times, we know it was warmer in Viking times, and we know damned well that it was a lot colder during the Little Ice Age. We know that it was colder when England and Scandinavia and much of northern North America were under hundreds to thousands of meters of ice. We have some reliable data from the times of the voyage of the Beagle and more since 1900, and after satellites we began to get really accurate primary data, but there are still anomalies, outages, gaps, missing data…

I know it has warmed in North America since Colonial times. I know we were concerned about Cooling when I was science editor of Galaxy. 

clip_image003

My morning paper headlines that 17,000 people have applied for 300 positions as LA City fire fighters. Is it possible that fire fighters are paid more than would be needed to attract qualified people to the job? But then the California board that governs the investment of pension funds has found itself lucky to make 1% return on those funds, but consistently gives the official estimate for future return at more than 7%. This is known as quality management.

 

clip_image002[8]

I cheerfully acknowledge that I paid no attention to Muller until this incident, and I did pay attention to what appeared to be reasonable statements by mainstream media. That, it turns out, was an error. Here is a good summary:

 

Surprise defection of Muller?

The surprise is that anyone believes this is a defection.

First and foremost, look here http://mullerandassociates.com/government/ . This is a company with Richard Muller , President and Chief Scientist, Elizabeth Muller, CEO. They make the following statements (on a page formerly named GreenGov in Oct 2011) "Energy policy involves economics, energy security, and climate change." and "Coal, as one example, is abundant in some countries, but it is also a strong emitter of carbon dioxide." They made those same statements before this paper was first submitted (2011), and thus supposedly before Muller was "convinced" by the data that humans changed climate. They therefore state that they believe in climate change caused by human produced CO2, and so stated at the same time they were claiming to be "skeptics". They get business and money if climate change is true, and lose money if it is false. They therefore have a serious conflict of interest. Conclusion, they were not at that time and never have been, "skeptics".

Muller enlisted some skeptics and middle of the roaders such as Anthony Watts and Dr. Judith Curry (listed co author), and then released a paper that was different that these people were told it would be, not using their data or input in ways he stated that he would. This was then followed by a media blitz in Oct 2011 which drew criticism from these contributors and co authors since it was released before peer review. This looks like simply getting the "skeptics" on board, or at least getting their names on the paper, to make it look as if Muller is a skeptic or at least is addressing their concerns. It was this first media blitz that claimed that Muller was now no longer a "skeptic" and was convinced by the data that humans changed climate. With the discovery of the above Muller and Associates statement that climate change is true prior to and during his claim of being a "skeptic", it is obvious that that claim was and is false. It looks like a classic "Black Flag" operation, claim to be one thing while actually being another. It is the old tactic "Ally, Neutralize, Destroy", Ally = "I am a fellow skeptic, like you", Neutralize = "Oh look, that data says humans are causing warming", Destroy = "If even I, a fellow skeptic, can see this, you skeptics should give up your skepticism and join the consensus".

This paper has still NOT passed peer review, in fact, at least one of the reviewers, Ross McKitrick, has recommended it not be published, stating "I submitted my review just before the end of September 2011, outlining what I saw were serious shortcomings in their methods and arguing that their analysis does not establish valid grounds for the conclusions they assert. I suggested the authors be asked to undertake a major revision." and then " On March 8 2012 I was asked by JGR to review a revised version of the Wickham et al. paper. I submitted my review at the end of March. The authors had made very few changes and had not addressed any of the methodological problems, so I recommended the paper not be published. I do not know what the journal’s decision was, but it is 4 months later and I can find no evidence on the BEST website that this or any other BEST project paper has been accepted for publication." http://www.rossmckitrick.com/

Listed co author Dr. Judith Curry states "Muller bases his ‘conversion’ on the results of their recent paper. So, how convincing is the analysis in Rohde et al.’s new paper?" followed by "I have made public statements that I am unconvinced by their analysis". http://judithcurry.com/2012/07/30/observation-based-attribution/#more-9238

Meanwhile, there is now evidence that "the data used by Muller to draw these conclusions was unreliable to the point of utter uselessness" http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100173174/global-warming-yeah-right/ . This is based on new findings that half of the US temperature change in the last 30 years is caused by bad station siting http://www.examiner.com/article/new-study-dismantles-muller-s-best-claims-half-the-warming-trend-artificial . You can see actual photographs of this bad station siting here http://www.surfacestations.org/ , no need to just take their word for it (suggest you look there during off peak hours, traffic has become heavy). Basically, fully 80% of the sites used to take the "official" temperature in the US are stated by the NOAA to be too poorly sited to be used officially, but are used anyway. Most of these sites have serious Urban Heat Island effects causing an artificially high temperature to be registered, these bad readings are then used to "adjust" the data even on well sited stations upwards. The temperatures you have been told about are therefor simply false. The problem will be even worse in other countries where there is even less quality control, and often few stations with temperatures of huge areas of the earth being measured at only a few (usually urban) stations (Siberia for instance). Half of all "official" "world average" temperatures are measured at airports, covered in miles of concrete and of course of necessity being near urban areas, usually surrounded by them Actual paper on this here http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/watts-et-al_2012_discussion_paper_webrelease.pdf (PDF), powerpoint overview here http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/watts-et-al-station-siting-7-29-12.ppt .

Conclusions:

Richard Muller is not now, and never was, a skeptic, as proven by his companies website.

His "defection" is therefor staged.

"Accompanied by the cheers of his compadres at Berkeley", mission accomplished.

His paper is stated to be flawed by it’s co author and some of it’s contributors, as well as others.

It has NOT been recommended for publication by peer review, nor has it been published.

Recent studies now show it to be based on flawed data anyway, in addition to the flawed methodology.

Even with all that, Mullers paper shows that over the last 15+ years, CO2 has increased but the temperature has not.

Legatus

Which confirms what we have actually long known about the True Believers in the Global Warming program. Sorry to have wasted so much time on this, but I had mail from a number of you asking about it – apparently the ploy worked well, and got the attention that Muller wanted. No surprises there. And the example confirms what we have known about the Believers for some time.

My thanks to all of you who have taken the trouble to chase this down.

clip_image002[9]

I meant to comment on this earlier.

drought 

Hi Jerry,

The latest hyperventilating on the TV news is about the threat of rising food prices because of the drought, particularly grains and meat.

Perhaps right now isn’t the best time to be burning food (ethanol) in our cars? If Obama can suspend the welfare work requirements (in violation of the black letter of the law), maybe he can suspend the ethanol mandates for a legitimate crisis?

Needless to say, I’m not holding my breath.

Cheers,

Doug=

That was the first thing I thought of after watching a news report on the drought and the coming corn shortage. Burning food is sinful, and a President who orders us to burn food in cars rather than drill for more oil does not have the best interests of the people who have to buy their food as his major goal. When the United States was booming, we could afford this kind of nonsense although I can think of more fun things to waste money on; but in this economy driving up the price of fuel by burning corn while preventing drilling is much worse than a blunder. Yet we continue to do it. As we continue to fund all kinds of nonsense that costs money.

The best thing one can do for giant corporations is to thicken the business environment with regulations requiring compliance specialists; the result is to prevent newcomers from entering the business, thus ensuring that the business will be dominated by the existing giants. We have always known this, and the Republicans know it as well as the Democrats. This regulatory environment has grown ever more complex under each party, but since the unionized public employees tend to vote Democrat it is harder for Democrat leaders to cut back regulations than it is for Republicans. The only remedy to these trends is for the American Middle Class to understand that self government requires that some citizens be willing to be part of the self government, and for others to become part of the governing structure of one of the major parties. Ideally both would be dominated by middle class citizens, as they were at one time. One problem is that we now live in an era in which fami9lies require two incomes. At one time one member of a family would work and the other might have the leisure to participate in politics, at least at a local level. Now that women are liberated and thus have to work it is much harder for the middle class to take part in self government. More on this another time.

We will see rising food prices and we will continue to see the Federal Government requiring us to convert food into automobile fuel at costs higher than the stuff can be sold for without subsidies. The subsidies keep the whole industry going – it would collapse without them, and food would be sold as food in the open market.

And they never catch wise…

clip_image002[9]

I am not a regular reader of Slate and I know no more about this than having read it: but it is disturbing.

Nonetheless, the goal of the “stakeholder engagement event,” as the TPP “Welcome Stakeholders!” packet explained, was to provide an “open and productive forum.” Yet the public knows more about the aggregate numbers of nuclear warheads the United States and Russia have deployed on intercontinental and submarine-launched ballistic missiles under the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty than it does about U.S. negotiating positions in TPP. Thus, on “openness,” the TPP negotiators and USTR have failed.

http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2012/07/trans_pacific_partnership_agreement_tpp_could_radically_alter_intellectual_property_law.html

 

clip_image002[9]

clip_image004

clip_image002[9]